Outcome of interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for lumbar spondylolisthesis

李危石,陈仲强,郭昭庆,齐强,刘忠军
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2005.01.011
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the outcome of posterolateral fusion(PLF) and interbodyfusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis.Method:111 patients who had been treated with instrumented interbody fusion(30 patients) or posterolateral fusion(81 patients) for lumbar spondylolisthesis were reviewed. These two groups were compared for clinical outcome and fusion rate.Result:The mean follow-up period was 19.9 months(range 7~68 months).The fusion rate was 85.2% for PLF and 96.7% for interbody fusion(P0.05). As to isthmic spondylolisthesis or Meyerding Grade degenerative spondylolithesis,the fusion rate was 75.0% for PLF and 100% for interbody fusion(P0.05). The clinical outcome was evaluated by means of 4-grade scale including excellent,good,fair and bad.The rate of excellent and good together was 93.3% in interbody fusion group and 88.9% in the PLF group(P0.05).Conclusion:The outcome of interbody fusion was similar with PLF.PLF is still a good bone graft method for Meyerding grade Ⅰ degenerative spondylolithesis.Interbody fusion is a better way to treat isthmic spondylolisthesis or Meyerding grade degenerative spondylolithesis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?