Abstract:The use of human biomonitoring data to characterize exposure to environmental contaminants in epidemiology studies has expanded greatly in recent years. Substantial variability in effect measures may arise when using different exposure metrics for a given contaminant, and it is often not clear which metric is the best surrogate for the 'causal' or 'true' exposure. Here we evaluated variability and potential bias in epidemiologic associations resulting from the use of different phthalate exposure metrics in the 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We examined associations between urinary phthalate metabolites and the outcomes of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). We examined each of the following NHANES-derived exposure metrics for metabolites of individual phthalates: molar excretion rate (nmol/min), molar amount (nmol), molar concentration (nmol/mL, with and without additional model adjustment for creatinine), creatinine corrected molar concentration (nmol/g creatinine), and reconstructed daily phthalate intake (nmol/kg/day). In order to investigate potential biasing effect of each metric, we first assumed that daily intake of the parent phthalate is the causal exposure. We then constructed a simulated population based on the 2009-2010 NHANES, and randomly assigned each individual a di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) intake dose based on a published distribution, but independent of any other factor. Accordingly, all associations between these randomly assigned intake doses and individuals' BMI and WC should be null. Next, demographic data in the NHANES were incorporated into a pharmacokinetic model to predict urinary molar excretions of five DEHP metabolites based on the randomly assigned DEHP intake. The predicted molar excretions were then used to calculate the same exposure metrics listed above. Three exposure metrics (randomly generated intake, excretion rate, urine concentration) showed no significant associations with BMI, which supports the null hypothesis stated above. In contrast, metrics adjusted for creatinine showed a significant negative correlation, and reconstructed daily intake showed a significant positive correlation, indicating the introduction of bias away from the true (i.e., null) association. Interestingly, trends in the simulation analysis were similar to those seen in the observed NHANES data. Our findings show that, at least in this example case, the choice of exposure metric can introduce significant bias of varying magnitude and direction into the calculation of epidemiologic associations.

Trade-offs of Personal Versus More Proxy Exposure Measures in Environmental Epidemiology

Validity of using ambient concentrations as surrogate exposures at the individual level for fine particle and black carbon: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Differential Participation, a Potential Cause of Spurious Associations in Observational Cohorts in Environmental Epidemiology

Biases Arising from the Use of Ambient Measurements to Represent Personal Exposure in Evaluating Inflammatory Responses to Fine Particulate Matter: Evidence from a Panel Study in Beijing, China

Exposure Misclassification and Threshold Concentrations in Time Series Analyses of Air Pollution Health Effects

Transporting established insights from classical experimental design, implemented using methods that rely on modern computing to address causal questions in environmental epidemiology

Challenges for environmental epidemiology research: are biomarker concentrations altered by kidney function or urine concentration adjustment?

Considerations and targeted approaches to identifying bad actors in exposure mixtures

Changes in epidemiologic associations with different exposure metrics: a case study of phthalate exposure associations with body mass index and waist circumference

Compare the marginal effects for environmental exposure and biomonitoring data with repeated measurements and values below the limit of detection

Estimating ambient-origin PM2.5 exposure for epidemiology: observations, prediction, and validation using personal sampling in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Reconstructing exposures from small samples using physiologically based pharmacokinetic models and multiple biomarkers

Efficient Study Design with Multiple Measurement Instruments

Air pollution exposure assessment methods utilized in epidemiological studies

New developments in exposure assessment: The impact on the practice of health risk assessment and epidemiological studies

Exposure prediction approaches used in air pollution epidemiology studies: Key findings and future recommendations

Impact of Roadside Mobile Monitoring Design on Epidemiologic Inference – A Case Study of Ultrafine Particles and Cognitive Function

The Exposure Metric Choices Have Significant Impact on the Association Between Short-Term Exposure to Outdoor Particulate Matter and Changes in Lung Function: Findings from A Panel Study in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients

Measurement error in two-stage analyses, with application to air pollution epidemiology

Measured and accounted-for confounding in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: Some thoughts for practitioners

Epidemiologic analyses with error-prone exposures: Review of current practice and recommendations