Transporting established insights from classical experimental design, implemented using methods that rely on modern computing to address causal questions in environmental epidemiology

Marie-Abele Bind*,Donald Rubin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isee.2016.3692
2016-01-01
ISEE Conference Abstracts
Abstract:Introduction: The environmental health effects have been studied for decades, where model-based methods have been standard for analyzing exposure-outcome associations. Methods: We propose a complementary approach to examine causal effects of environmental exposures on health outcomes based on insights from classical experimental design that rely on modern computing. We illustrate our approach using two examples, the effect of extreme hot temperatures on cardiovascular mortality, and the effect of parental smoking on children's lung function. Our approach proposes an analysis strategy with four transparent, distinct, and ordered stages: 1) The precise formulation of the causal question (and related assumptions) in terms of a hypothetical randomized experiment using a potential outcomes framework. 2) A design stage that attempts to reconstruct the ideal conditions for a randomized experiment (that is, with unconfounded exposure assignment). 3) A statistical analysis comparing the outcomes of interest in the exposed versus unexposed units of the hypothetical randomized experiment. 4) A conclusion about evidence for or against the hypothesized causal question. Results: When investigating the causal effect of extreme temperatures on cardiovascular mortality in Los Angeles, we find similar effect estimates using the standard regression approach and our alternative approach (e.g., the estimated difference in daily mortality is 0.05, comparing days with Tmax>30C to milder days). However, we find different conclusions when we examine the causal effect of parental smoking in a classical dataset on children's FEV-1 (the estimated causal effect equals to -0.34 [95%CI:-0.59; -0.09] using our approach (here, matched-sampling) vs. -0.09 [95%CI:-0.20; 0.03] using standard regression). Conclusions: Because of its conceptual links to (hypothetical) interventions, our approach can suggest the effects of policies for reducing environmental pollutants and thereby preventing diseases.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?