Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin According to Frailty in Patients with Heart Failure: A Prespecified Analysis of the DELIVER Trial

Jawad H. Butt,Pardeep S. Jhund,Jan Belohlávek,Rudolf A. de Boer,Chern-En Chiang,Akshai S. Desai,Adrian F. Hernandez,Silvio E. Inzucchi,Tzvetana Katova,Masafumi Kitakaze,Mikhail N. Kosiborod,Carolyn S.P. Lam,Anna Maria Langkilde,Daniel Lindholm,Erasmus Bachus,Felipe Martinez,Béla Merkely,Magnus Petersson,Jose F. Kerr Saraiva,Sanjiv J. Shah,Muthiah Vaduganathan,Orly Vardeny,Ulrica Wilderäng,Brian L. Claggett,Scott D. Solomon,John J.V. McMurray,Jaroslaw Drożdzż
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061754
IF: 37.8
2022-08-29
Circulation
Abstract:Background: Frailty is increasing in prevalence and because frail patients are often perceived to have a less favorable benefit/risk profile, they may be less likely to receive new pharmacological treatments. We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of dapagliflozin according to frailty status in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction randomized in DELIVER. Methods: Frailty was measured using the Rockwood cumulative deficit approach. The primary endpoint was time to a first worsening heart failure event or cardiovascular death. Results: Of the 6263 patients randomized, a Frailty Index (FI) was calculable in 6258. In total, 2,354 (37.6%) patients had class 1 frailty (FI 0.311, i.e., most frail). Greater frailty was associated with a higher rate of the primary endpoint (per 100 person years): FI class 1, 6.3 (95% CI 5.7-7.1); class 2, 8.3 (7.5-9.1); and class 3, 13.4 (12.1-14.7), P<0.001. The effect of dapagliflozin (as a hazard ratio) on the primary endpoint from FI class 1 to 3 was: 0.85 (95% CI, 0.68-1.06); 0.89 (0.74-1.08); and 0.74 (0.61-0.91), respectively (P interaction =0.40). Although frailer patients had worse KCCQ scores at baseline, the improvement with dapagliflozin was greater than in less frail patients: placebo-corrected improvement in KCCQ-OSS at 4 months FI class 1, 0.3 (95% CI -0.9 to 1.4); class 2, 1.5 (0.3-2.7); and class 3, 3.4 (1.7-5.1) [P interaction =0.021]. Adverse reactions and treatment discontinuation, while more frequent in frailer patients, were not more common with dapagliflozin than placebo, irrespective of frailty class. Conclusions: In DELIVER, frailty was common and associated with worse outcomes. The benefit of dapagliflozin was consistent across the range of frailty studied. The improvement in health-related quality of life with dapagliflozin occurred early and was greater in patients with greater frailty.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?