Sacubitril/Valsartan and Frailty in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Jawad H. Butt,Pooja Dewan,Pardeep S. Jhund,Inder S. Anand,Dan Atar,Junbo Ge,Akshay S. Desai,Luis E. Echeverria,Lars Kober,Carolyn S. P. Lam,Aldo P. Maggioni,Felipe Martinez,Milton Packer,Jean L. Rouleau,David Sim,Dirk J. Van Veldhuisen,Bojan Vrtovec,Faiez Zannad,Michael R. Zile,Jianjian Gong,Martin P. Lefkowitz,Adel R. Rizkala,Scott D. Solomon,John J. McMurray

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.06.037

IF: 24

2022-01-01

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract:BACKGROUND Frailty is an increasingly common problem, and frail patients are less likely to receive new pharmacologic therapies because the risk-benefit profile is perceived to be less favorable than in nonfrail patients. OBJECTIVES This study investigated the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan according to frailty status in 4,796 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction randomized in the PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) trial. METHODS Frailty was measured by using the Rockwood cumulative deficit approach. The primary endpoint was total heart failure hospitalizations or cardiovascular death. RESULTS A frailty index (FI) was calculable in 4,795 patients. In total, 45.2% had class 1 frailty (FI #0.210, not frail), 43.5% had class 2 frailty (FI 0.211-0.310, more frail), and 11.4% had class 3 frailty (FI $0.311, most frail). There was a graded relationship between FI class and the primary endpoint, with a significantly higher risk associated with greater frailty (class 1: reference; class 2 rate ratio: 2.19 [95% CI: 1.85-2.60]; class 3 rate ratio: 3.29 [95% CI: 2.65-4.09]). The effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan on the primary endpoint from lowest to highest FI class (as a rate ratio) was: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.76-1.27], 0.92 [95% CI: 0.76-1.12], and 0.69 [95% CI: 0.51-0.95]), respectively (P-interaction = 0.23). When FI was examined as a continuous variable, the interaction with treatment was significant for the primary outcome (P-interaction = 0.002) and total heart failure hospitalizations (P-interaction < 0.001), with those most frail deriving greater benefit. CONCLUSIONS Frailty was common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and associated with worse outcomes. Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan seemed to show a greater reduction in the primary endpoint with increasing frailty, although this was not significant when FI was examined as a categorical variable. (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PARAGON-HF]; NCT01920711). (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.