Abstract:The concern about environmental issues centering around CAFOs is appropriate. The veterinary profession can be an important force in meeting these challenges by broadening its scope of knowledge and practice into the broader environmental field. Although animal agriculture's contribution to environmental concerns is the focus of this article, it is only one of several sectors that contributes to environmental degradation. Crop production, as well as livestock production industries, contribute to pollution. Manufacturing industries, municipalities, private individuals, our consumptive lifestyles, and agriculture all contribute to the degradation of our environment. One must keep in mind the huge importance of our agricultural industry and not single it out to the detriment of its progress. We have an abundance of high-quality foods at the lowest cost to the individual of any industrialized nation. We export over 40 billion dollars in agricultural products yearly. Agriculture sustains our rural economies and provides opportunities for over 2 million private enterprises scattered across the country; however, there is a goal that we have a sustainable agriculture. A big part of that depends on development and enhancement of an agriculture that does not pollute, that sustains its farm operators and workers, and that does not make the area residents ill or degrade their quality of life; however, the current situation is not promising. Much remains to be learned about the actual acute and long-term health consequences of animal agricultural pollution. Many health concerns are speculative, even though based on sound facts. We know that many surface waters have excess N and P that leads to eutrophication and possibly enhanced growth of undesirable organisms such as Pfiesteria piscicida. We know that other animal pathogens, such as cryptosporidia, have caused large community outbreaks. There are other potential pathogens, such as Salmonella sp, for which we do not know the hazard. We know that our soils may become excessively laden with P, Cu, and Zn, which retard plant growth and create toxic conditions for grazing animals. There are concerns about air pollution. Odors have negative sensory and physical health consequences. H2S and dust may cause toxic effects on neighbors. NH3 vaporizing from manure sources may be carried with precipitation to cause eutrophication in lakes or altered ecosystems in natural areas. CH4 escaping from degrading manure contributes to greenhouse gases. Workers in confined livestock structures have high risk for a variety of chronic respiratory conditions. They also are at risk for acute poisoning from H2S in operations where liquid manure is stored in confined spaces. There have been numerous health complaints in recent years from community neighbors of large-scale livestock operations. One study showed adverse altered mood states, and another showed evidence of respiratory illness similar to what workers experience. Although it has not been possible to objectively measure conditions and know toxic levels of substances causing these illnesses, there are so-called extratoxic mechanisms, such as inherent aversion to putrefactive odors and exacerbation of preexisting conditions that lower the tolerance threshold. Environmental concerns regarding livestock production are not new. In the early and mid-1970s, there were many conferences and publications regarding odors and water contamination from livestock operations. Although most of what is known in this area has been known for 20 years, relatively little effective efforts have been made to correct the concerns. In fact, trends over this past decade have increased the concerns. This past decade has seen a tremendous acceleration in the concentration and consolidation of agriculture, capping a slow trend over the past 50 years toward larger, fewer, and more-specialized farms. This trend has gone against the old saying that "dilution is the solution to pollution.

Water quality and management in the Australian pig industry

In-Water Antibiotic Dosing Practices on Pig Farms

Current and future antimicrobial resistance issues for the Australian pig industry

Antimicrobial use in the Australian pig industry: results of a national survey

The importance of water in pig farming

Farm characteristics affecting antibiotic consumption in pig farms in England

Linking Animal Welfare and Antibiotic Use in Pig Farming—A Review

Feed- and feed additives-related aspects of gut health and development in weanling pigs

Improvements of weaned pigs barn hygiene to reduce the spread of antimicrobial resistance

Optimising the hygiene of a liquid feeding system to improve the quality of liquid feed for pigs

Nutrient leaching losses from undisturbed soil cores following applications of piggery wastewater

PSIII-14 Effect of Water Delivery System on Intestinal Microbial Populations of Nursery Pigs

Implementing drinking water feed additive strategies in post-weaning piglets, antibiotic reduction and performance impacts: case study

Status Monitoring towards Water Consumption of Pigs at Each Stage in Pig Farms in Beijing

Treatments of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Heavy Metals in Swine Wastewater

Spatiotemporal Variations and Developments of Water Footprints of Pig Feeding and Pork Production in China (2004–2013)

Impacts of African swine fever on water quality in China

Feeding and Management System to Reduce Environmental Pollution in Swine Production - Review

The concentration of swine production. Effects on swine health, productivity, human health, and the environment

Impacts of effluent from different livestock farm types (pig, cow, and poultry) on surrounding water quality: a comprehensive assessment using individual parameter evaluation method and water quality indices

Antimicrobial use in laboratory rodent facilities in Australia and New Zealand- a cross-sectional survey of veterinarians and facility managers