Abstract:Developing students' critical thinking skills in writing is essential in different educational contexts. However, the analysis of the argument structure in non-English-major undergraduate students' writing remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to analyze the structure of argumentative English papers written by Chinese university students, based on the adapted Toulmin model of argument structure constituting six elements (claim, data, counterargument claim, counterargument data, rebuttal claim, and rebuttal data). The participants in this study were a class of 47 sophomores enrolled in the course "Modern Education Technology" at Zhejiang University, China. They were required to identify the components of the argument structure in a pre-assigned short text with two opposing views, and to write an argumentative essay. Content analysis was used to assess the students' CT and argument structures. In both tasks, the results found that the majority of the students could identify author's claim with at least a piece of data. They also stated their own claims and provided at least one piece of data to back these up. However, a majority failed to identify the author's counter argument and even though many stated the counter argument claims in their essays, most were unjustified. The majority did not state a conclusion in both tasks. This study may be beneficial in understanding non-English major-undergraduate students' critical thinking skills in English writing and the results suggest that L2 essay writing instructors should use active and explicit methods such as computer-assisted argument mapping tools like RationaleTM to help learners master the argument structure. Some pedagogic guidelines are listed for the implementation of the RationaleTM software in the L2 classroom.

Computational thinking: A mediation tool and higher-order thinking for linking EFL grammar knowledge with competency

Analyzing Critical Thinking Elements in the Argument Structure of Non-English-Major Chinese Undergraduate Students' Writing

Teaching critical thinking to Chinese students in English as a foreign language writing class: A review

Critical Thinking and Argumentative Writing: Inspecting the Association among EFL Learners in China

Can Learning a Foreign Language Foster Analytic Thinking?—Evidence from Chinese EFL Learners' Writings

Teacher-Student Collaborative Assessment and Content-Based Instruction: A Case Study of English Writing at a Chinese University

COMPUTATIONAL THINKING INTEGRATED INTO PRIMARY ENGLISH LESSONS IN CHINA IN PRACTICE

Evaluating critical thinking of English learners using modern technologies and GTMA

Cultivation and practice of computational thinking in Project-based teaching

Developing and Validating the English Teachers' Cognitions About Grammar Teaching Questionnaire (TCAGTQ) to Uncover Teacher Thinking

An Investigation of Critical Thinking Manifested in the Questions of EFL Textbooks for Tertiary-Level English Majors of China

Learning to teach critical thinking: testimonies of three EFL teachers in China

Integrating Computational Thinking Concept Into Digital Storytelling to Improve Learners’ Motivation and Performance

Investigating University EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Critical Thinking and Its Teaching: Voices from China

Developing Eighth-Grade Students’ Computational Thinking with Critical Reflection

Computational Thinking Integrated into the English Language Curriculum in Primary Education: A Systematic Review

Insight from the association between critical thinking and English argumentative writing: catering to English learners’ writing ability

External Factors and Endogenous Elements Fostering Critical Thinking of Tertiary EFL Learners in China: A Grounded Theory Study

A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of EFL Students' Critical Thinking Dispositions in Digital Learning

Improving EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills in Argumentative Writing

Chinese pre-service teachers’ cognitions about cultivating critical thinking in teaching English as a foreign language