Abstract:When making inferences about the mental lives of others (e.g., others' preferences), it is critical to consider the extent to which the choices we observe are constrained. Prior research on the development of this tendency indicates a contradictory pattern: Children show remarkable sensitivity to constraints in traditional experimental paradigms, yet often fail to consider real‐world constraints and privilege inherent causes instead. We propose that one explanation for this discrepancy may be that real‐world constraints are often stable over time and lose their salience. The present research tested whether children (N = 133, 5‐ to 12‐year‐old mostly US children; 55% female, 45% male) become less sensitive to an actor's constraints after first observing two constrained actors (Stable condition) versus after first observing two actors in contexts with greater choice (Not Stable condition). We crossed the stability of the constraint with the type of constraint: either the constraint was deterministic such that there was only one option available (No Other Option constraint) or, in line with many real‐world constraints, the constraint was probabilistic such that there was another option, but it was difficult to access (Hard to Access constraint). Results indicated that children in the Stable condition became less sensitive to the probabilistic Hard to Access constraint across trials. Notably, we also found that children's sensitivity to constraints was enhanced in the Not Stable condition regardless of whether the constraint was probabilistic or deterministic. We discuss implications for children's sensitivity to real‐world constraints. Research Highlights This research addresses the apparent contradiction that children are sensitive to constraints in experimental paradigms but are often insensitive to constraints in the real world. One explanation for this discrepancy is that constraints in the real world tend to be stable over time and may lose their salience. When probabilistic constraints (i.e., when a second option is available but hard to access) are stable, children become de‐sensitized to constraints across trials. First observing contexts with greater choice increases children's sensitivity to both probabilistic and deterministic constraints.

What makes Simon Says so difficult for young children?

Inhibition and young children’s performance on the Tower of London task

Individual differences in the Simon effect are underpinned by differences in the competitive dynamics in the basal ganglia: An experimental verification and a computational model

What makes responses prepotent for young children? Insights from the grass-snow task

Cooperation, but Not Competition, Improves 4-Year-old Children's Reasoning about Others' Diverse Desires.

Development of executive attention in preschool children

Distinct Inhibitory Control Mechanisms Underlie Selective Social Inferences

Don't you see the possibilities? Young preschoolers may lack possibility concepts

Social context effects in 2- and 4-year-olds' selective versus faithful imitation

Development of Behavioural Regulation in Do and Don't Contexts among Behaviourally Inhibited Chinese Children

Group Conquers Efficacy: Preschoolers' Imitation Under Conflict Between Minimal Group Membership And Behavior Efficacy

How barriers become invisible: Children are less sensitive to constraints that are stable over time

Inconsistent flanker congruency effects across stimulus types and age groups: A cautionary tale

Limits on Training Inhibitory Control with a Focused Video Game

Distinct Inhibitory-Control Processes Underlie Children's Judgments of Fairness

Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task

How you act matters: The impact of coordination on 4-year-old children's reasoning about diverse desires

Practice effects vs. transfer effects in the Simon task

From eyes to hands: Transfer of learning in the Simon task across motor effectors

Preschoolers' Motivation to Over-Imitate Humans and Robots

Children use rules to coordinate in a social dilemma