Abstract:With rising up for more than twenty years,government performance management has expanded from an instrument used to deal with financial and trust crisis by western countries,improving administrative efficiency to an important component of government reform and innovation.The practical value and theoretical advantages of new public management was fully reflected in it.However,the theoretical defects and practical puzzles of government performance management,especially the conflict of public value,have never ceased from the exploration of academia.Based on the case investigation in China,the United States,Japan,South Korea and Vietnam,this paper proposes a public value-based government performance governance theoretical framework through qualitative research on the institutional transition of government performance management and the history of public administration.Firstly,the paper rethinks the government performance management under NPM paradigm from the aspects of "publicness","Co-production" and "sustainability",and proposes that public value is essentially vital to the legitimacy of government performance.Secondly,the paper preliminarily proves two fundamental propositions of public value-based government performance governance : One is that government performance is a social construction,and the other is that output equals performance.This paper believes that government performance could get the legitimacy foundation only if it comes from the society and these kinds of performance could generate the necessity of its sustainable improvement.The social construction of government performance is the underlying motivation of government performance management.While the scientific management based on the value construction of government performance could guarantee the highly coherence between government outputs and social requirements,so as to reflect the value of scientific management.Thirdly,following the two propositions,this paper builds a public value-based government performance governance model based on value management and management science theory,and briefly illustrates the value construction,organizational management and synergetic leadership system of government performance management within the model.At last,six key research questions in the future were put forward for academic discussion from the aspects of how to realize the model,the value analysis and research development of government performance management.

Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management

Beyond New Public Governance

Rethinking value in public management

Public Value Management: An Emerging Paradigm in Public Administration

Public Value Accounting: Establishing the Philosophical Basis

Value and Value Neutrality in Public Management Research——A Historical Narrative and Forge Ahead to the Future for the Return of Public Management Value

The Public Sector In An In-Between Time: Searching For New Public Values

Competing Values in Public Administration

Public Value Privatized? the Need for a Continuous Emphasis on How to Actualize the Public Interest

The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering

Value Solidity in Government and Business

Competing Values in Public Management

Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory

The continued call and future of administrative reform in the United States

Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation

New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance

The future of public administration research: An editor's perspective

What Government Must Do Well: Creating Value for Society

Transparency and Public Value—Analyzing the Transparency Practices and Value Creation of Public Utilities

New development: Expanding public service value to include dis/value

Public Value-Based Government Performance Governance:Origin,Structure and Research Questions