Comparison of the Mechanical and Electrochemical Properties of WC-25Co Coatings Obtained by High Velocity Oxy-Fuel and Cold Gas Spraying

M. Couto,S. Dosta,J. Fernández,J. M. Guilemany
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-014-0123-0
IF: 2.839
2014-07-02
Journal of Thermal Spray Technology
Abstract:Cold gas spray (CGS) coatings were previously produced by spraying WC-25Co cermet powders onto Al7075-T6 and low-carbon steel substrates. Unlike conventional flame spray techniques (e.g., high-velocity oxy-fuel; HVOF), no melting of the powder occurs; the particles are deformed and bond together after being sprayed by a supersonic jet of compressed gas, thereby building up several layers and forming a coating. WC-Co cermets are used in wear-resistant parts, because of their combination of mechanical, physical, and chemical properties. XRD tests were previously run on the initial powder and the coatings to determine possible phase changes during spraying. The bonding strength of the coatings was measured by adhesion tests. Here, WC-25Co coatings were also deposited on the same substrates by HVOF spraying. The wear resistance and fracture toughness of the coatings obtained previously by CGS and the HVOF coatings obtained here were studied. Their corrosion resistance was determined by electrochemical measurements. It was possible to achieve thick, dense, and hard CGS coatings on Al7075-T6 and low-carbon steel substrates, with better or the same mechanical and electrochemical properties as those of the HVOF coatings; making the former a highly competitive method for producing WC-25Co coatings.
materials science, coatings & films
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to compare the mechanical and electrochemical properties of WC - 25Co coatings prepared by two different techniques, high - velocity oxy - fuel spraying (HVOF) and cold gas spraying (CGS). Specifically, the research aims to: 1. **Obtain coatings**: Deposit WC - 25Co coatings on Al7075 - T6 and low - carbon steel substrates using HVOF and CGS techniques respectively. 2. **Compare properties**: Through a series of mechanical and electrochemical tests, compare the performance differences in hardness, wear resistance, fracture toughness and corrosion resistance of the coatings prepared by these two techniques. ### Main research contents: - **Materials and methods**: - The powder used is a WC - Co composite containing 25wt.% cobalt, provided by Fujimi Inc. - The substrates include Al7075 - T6 and low - carbon steel, which were pretreated respectively to improve coating adhesion. - The microstructure and phase composition of the powder and coatings were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X - ray diffraction (XRD). - Vickers hardness test, elastic modulus test, friction and wear test and electrochemical corrosion test were carried out. - **Experimental results**: - **Microstructure**: Decarburization and the formation of brittle phases occur in HVOF coatings at high temperatures, while CGS coatings maintain the microstructure of the original powder. - **Hardness**: The HVOF coating has a higher hardness but is more brittle; the CGS coating has a slightly lower hardness but better toughness. - **Wear resistance**: The coatings prepared by the two techniques show similar wear - resistant properties in the rubber wheel wear test, but in the sliding wear test, the CGS coating shows higher wear resistance and a lower friction coefficient. - **Fracture toughness**: The fracture toughness of the CGS coating is significantly higher than that of the HVOF coating, mainly because no brittle phase is formed during the CGS process. - **Adhesion**: The HVOF coating has higher adhesion on the Al7075 - T6 substrate, while the CGS coating has higher adhesion on the low - carbon steel substrate. - **Electrochemical properties**: The electrochemical corrosion resistance of the CGS coating is slightly better than that of the HVOF coating, mainly because the CGS coating is more compact and has a lower porosity. ### Conclusion: Although the deposition efficiency of the CGS technique is lower than that of the HVOF technique, CGS can prepare WC - 25Co coatings that are dense, thick and have good adhesion. These coatings show performance equivalent to or better than that of HVOF coatings in terms of mechanical and electrochemical properties, especially in fracture toughness and wear resistance. Therefore, the CGS technique is highly competitive in preparing WC - 25Co coatings.