Clinically validated HPV assays offer comparable long‐term safety in primary cervical cancer screening: A 9‐year follow‐up of a population‐based screening cohort
Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak,Kelsi R. Kroon,Danijela Fabjan,Jana Mlakar,Katja Seme,Johannes Berkhof,Mario Poljak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35200
2024-09-25
International Journal of Cancer
Abstract:What's new? Human papillomavirus (HPV)‐based testing is replacing cytology for primary cervical screening, owing to its superior sensitivity and negative predictive value. Nonetheless, it remains unclear which HPV assays are most effective and offer the best longitudinal performance. This population‐based cohort study assessed the long‐term safety of five screening methods, including cytology and four clinically validated HPV assays, for cervical cancer screening. Analyses show that regardless of the assay used, HPV assays are comparable in safety and more effectively safeguard against precancerous lesions than cytology. HPV assays differed, however, in longitudinal specificity and associated referral rates and in ability to define HPV‐specific risks. Molecular testing for human papillomaviruses (HPV) is gradually replacing cytology in cervical cancer screening. In this longitudinal population‐based cohort study, 4140 women 20 to 64 years old attending organized screening were tested at baseline by five different screening methods and followed for 9 years. To assess long‐term safety, the cumulative risks of CIN2+/CIN3+ were estimated after a negative baseline result obtained by conventional cytology and four clinically validated HPV assays: Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2), RealTime High Risk HPV assay (RealTime), cobas 4800 HPV Test (cobas_4800), and Alinity m HR HPV (Alinity). HPV‐negative women at baseline had a substantially lower risk for CIN2+ compared to those with normal baseline cytology: 0.84% (95% CI, 0.46–1.22), 0.90% (95% CI, 0.51–1.29), 0.78% (95% CI, 0.42–1.15), and 0.75% (95% CI, 0.39–1.11) for hc2, RealTime, cobas_4800, and Alinity, respectively, compared to 2.46% (95% CI, 1.88–3.03) for cytology. No differences were observed between HPV assays in longitudinal sensitivity (range: 86.21%–90.36%) and negative predictive values (range: 99.54%–99.70%) for CIN2+ in women ≥30 years, but were significantly different from cytology (p
oncology