Abstract:Background/purpose: The surgical fixation of a symphyseal diastasis in partially or fully unstable pelvic ring injuries is an important element when stabilizing the anterior pelvic ring. Currently, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) by means of plating represents the gold standard treatment. Advances in percutaneous fixation techniques have shown improvements in blood loss, surgery time, and scar length. Therefore, this approach should also be adopted for treatment of symphyseal injuries. The technique could be important since failure rates, following ORIF at the symphysis, remain unacceptably high. The aim of this biomechanical study was to assess a semi-rigid fixation technique for treatment of such anterior pelvic ring injuries versus current gold standards of plate osteosynthesis. Methods: An anterior pelvic ring injury type III APC according to the Young and Burgess classification was simulated in eighteen composite pelvises, assigned to three groups (n = 6) for fixation with either a single plate, two orthogonally positioned plates, or the semi-rigid technique using an endobutton suture implant. Biomechanical testing was performed in a simulated upright standing position under progressively increasing cyclic loading at 2 Hz until failure or over 150,000 cycles. Relative movements between the bone segments were captured by motion tracking. Results: Initial quasi-static and dynamic stiffness, as well as dynamic stiffness after 100,000 cycles, was not significantly different among the fixation techniques (p ≥ 0.054).). The outcome measures for total displacement after 20,000, 40,000, 60,000, 80,000, and 100,000 cycles were associated with significantly higher values for the suture technique versus double plating (p = 0.025), without further significant differences among the techniques (p ≥ 0.349). Number of cycles to failure and load at failure were highest for double plating (150,000 ± 0/100.0 ± 0.0 N), followed by single plating (132,282 ± 20,465/91.1 ± 10.2 N), and the suture technique (116,088 ± 12,169/83.0 ± 6.1 N), with significantly lower values in the latter compared to the former (p = 0.002) and no further significant differences among the techniques (p ≥ 0.329). Conclusion: From a biomechanical perspective, the semi-rigid technique for fixation of unstable pubic symphysis injuries demonstrated promising results with moderate to inferior behaviour compared to standard plating techniques regarding stiffness, cycles to failure and load at failure. This knowledge could lay the foundation for realization of further studies with larger sample sizes, focusing on the stabilization of the anterior pelvic ring.

Does surgically fixation of pubic fracture increase the stability of the operated posterior pelvis?

Computer Aided Design and Evaluation of New Anatomic Fixation System on Entire Pelvic Model

Substitutional semi-rigid osteosynthesis technique for treatment of unstable pubic symphysis injuries: a biomechanical study

Do we need to fix the anterior fracture component in insufficiency fractures of the pelvis? A biomechanical comparison on an FFP type IIIc fracture in an osteoporotic pelvic bone model

Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Anterior Pelvic Ring Fractures: a Finite Element Analysis and Clinical Study

Fixation of transforaminal sacrum fractures: a biomechanical study

Plate fixation of inferior ramus in pubis-ischium ramus improves mechanical stability in Tile B pelvic injures: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis and early clinical experience

Biomechanical Research on Anterior Double‐plate Fixation for Vertically Unstable Sacroiliac Dislocations

Pelvic Ring Fractures: Does Spinopelvic Alignment Affect Sacral and Lumbopelvic Fixation Stability?

Numerical study of pedicle screw construction and locking compression plate fixation in posterior pelvic ring injuries: Analyzed by finite element method

Biomechanical comparison of three minimally invasive fixations for unilateral pubic rami fractures

Comparison of Biomechanical Characteristics and Pelvic Ring Stability Using Different Fixation Methods to Treat Pubic Symphysis Diastasis

Finite-element analysis of different fixation types after Enneking II + III pelvic tumor resection

The clinical relevance of fixation failure after pubic symphysis plating for anterior pelvic ring injuries: an observational cohort study with long-term follow-up

Different fixation methods for transverse acetabular fracture：a finite element analysis

Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation Systems in Posterior Wall Fracture of Acetabular by Finite Element Analysis

Modified Pedicle Screw-Rod Versus Anterior Subcutaneous Internal Pelvic Fixation for Unstable Pelvic Anterior Ring Fracture: A Retrospective Study and Finite Element Analysis

External Fixation Combined with Locking Compression Plate in Treatment of Unstable Pelvic Fractures

Biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for "H"- and "U"-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study

Comparison of stability of two kinds of sacro-iliac screws in the fixation of bilateral sacral fractures in a finite element model

Modified Pedicle Screw-Rod Versus Anterior Subcutaneous Internal Pelvic Fixation for Unstable Anterior Pelvic Ring Fracture: a Retrospective Study and Finite Element Analysis.