Abstract:The “International Relations” (“IR”) discipline is going through a double-disciplinary crisis. Once again, there is a general feeling of increasingly fragmenting common ground within the discipline (the first crisis) and the acknowledgment that the “IR” only imports concepts and methods from other disciplines but does not export any (the second crisis). Both crises share the same origin. The subject matter – “international” – has not been rooted in any social ontology. The discipline is now searching for the social ontology of “international.” The most discussed candidate for such a role is “societal multiplicity”, a product of “uneven and combined development”. The article offers an alternative variant of the social ontology for “international,” which is based on Niklas Luhmann’s system theory and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s social theory. It argues that “international” is rooted in the segmentary systemic differentiation between inside and outside and in the struggle for recognition of these segments. The semantic marker for this ontology is “sovereignty.” In this way, “sovereignty” turns into a systemic program (in Luhmann’s terms) of international politics (as a subsystem of the world society political system), designating the common ground for the discipline and marking social processes and phenomena, which can be studied within the “IR”. This will allow the “International Relations” to export some of its concepts and methods to other social science disciplines. The article critically engages with the Theory of World Politics by Mathias Albert, reconstructing it to meet the challenge of the double-disciplinary crisis. The “balance of power” is criticized with the help of Michel Foucault, who showed: that among European powers in 19th-century Europe, the balance of power, responsible for producing international order, was linked with the police inside states, responsible for producing domestic order. Nevertheless, to keep the balance of power and to secure the domestic order, states and police used the same technique of observation – statistics, making the “balance of power” a non-autopoietic system program incapable of producing an autopoietic system of international relations. “Sovereignty” also spans both realms of the inside/outside divide but is observed mainly through external recognition and is rooted in the social ontology of “international.” The article argues that “sovereignty” is better suited for the system program of international politics than the “balance of power”.

Materializing the ‘non-Western’: two stories of Japanese philosophers on culture and politics in the inter-war period

Edmund Husserl’s Political Praxis and Theoretical Reflections During World War I

Reimagining Modern Education: Contributions from Modern Japanese Philosophy and Practice?

Depoliticization or Americanization of Japanese Science Studies

Essentialism in Early Shinto Studies

Traditional Motives in the Aesthetic Views of the 20th Century Japanese PhilosophersKuki Shuzo, Karaki Junzo, Kato Shinro

Ryukyu:War Memories,Social Campaigns and Historical Interpretations

Sociology of ritual and narrative as post-Western sociology: from the perspective of Confucianism and Nativism in the Edo period of Japan

Fear of World War III: Social Politics of Japan’s Rearmament and Peace Movements, 1950–3

Questioning western universality: Sōseki's Theory of Literature and his novel Kusamakura

Fūdo in Foreign Language Learning in Japan and Finland

Analogous Exceptionalisms within Japanese and American History: Kokugaku and Transcendentalism

On the Aesthetics and Politics of Neoconservatism in Postwar Japan and America

Beyond History: non-traditional security cooperation and the construction of Northeast Asian international society

Constructed Territories: Featuring A Fantasy of East Asian Border Disputes

Sociology of the Japanese, by the Japanese, for the Japanese: A short history of unintentional indigenization of sociology in Japan

Grounding Ontology of the “International” in Terms of Radical Constructivism

Returning to “Asia”: Japanese embraces of Sino–Indian friendship, 1953–1962

CONCERNING THE IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON THE PROCESSES OF SPIRITUAL DEVELOPMENT IN JAPAN

Memory Politics and Ontological Security in Sino-Japanese Relations

Japanese Thinking on the Nature of Shinto during the Last Years of ~(19)th Century and the First Years of ~(20)th Century——the Encounter between Kokugaku and Modern Religious Studies