Abstract:Background Frailty is a clinical condition that results in increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes in older adults, such as falls, hospitalization, disability, and mortality. Thus, great efforts have been made to prevent the transition from the robust elderly to the frail state. We know that balance and muscle strength are often addressed to prevent these negative outcomes, however, it is unclear if there are differences between groups classified by physical frailty. Objectives To compare balance (One-leg standing, postural stability in gait, sensory interaction in balance, chair sit-up) and muscle strength (trunk extensors-TE, hip extensors-HE, hip abductors-HA, knee extensors-KE, and plantar flexors-PF) in community-dwelling older adults classified as robust (non-frail) and vulnerable (pre-frail or frail)). Methods Cross-sectional observational study with community-dwelling older adults (60 years or older) of both sexes, with independent gait and recruited by convenience. One-leg standing balance (30 seconds), postural stability in gait (Functional Gait Assessment), sensory interaction in balance (Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance), sit-up from a chair five times, and muscle strength (maximal isometric contraction) of TE, HE, HA, KE, and PF, expressed by torque and normalized by body weight (microFET2 hand dynamometer) were assessed. The robust and vulnerable elderly were classified by physical frailty phenotype. Mann-Whitney analysis was used to compare the variables between groups. The significance level was set at 5%. Results 118 older adults were evaluated, of these 35 were robust and 85 were vulnerable. Descriptive and comparison data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation for the robust and vulnerable groups, respectively: one-leg standing balance (18.17 seconds ± 2.09; ± 10.73 seconds ± 1.16; p=0.005), postural stability in gait (23.80 ± 0.73; 21.41 ± 0.55; p = 0.014), sensory interaction in balance (113.83 seconds ± 1.98; 102.98 seconds ± 2.30; p=0.001), chair sit-up (10.78 seconds ± 0.30; 13.77 ± 0.61; p = 0.001), TE muscle strength (1.17 ± 0.081; 0.98 ± 0.04; p = 0.069), HE (0.47 ± 0.46; 0.42 ± 0.02; p = 0.463), HA (1.01 ± 0.05; 0.88 ± 0.03; p = 0.068), KE (1.23 ± 0.09; 1.04 ± 0.04; p= 0.111), PF (1.59 ±1.10; 0.82 ± 0.41; p = 0.059). According to the results only the balance variables showed difference between the groups. Conclusion The older adults vulnerable to physical fragility had worse one-leg standing balance, less postural stability during gait, less sensory interaction on balance and spent more time to get up from a chair when compared to the robust elderly. Parameters of muscle strength showed no differences between the groups. Continuation of the study with increased sample size is necessary for confirmation of the results. Support from CAPES, FAPEMIG, CNPq. Implications From the findings found, it highlights the importance of evaluating balance in several perspectives in older adults’ people vulnerable to physical frailty. Further studies may address whether interventions directed at these variables can modify frailty status.

Agreement of body weight of older adults measured on digital chair scale and mechanical platform scale

Effect of body mass index and fat mass on balance force platform measurements during a one-legged stance in older adults

Body fat percentage assessment by skinfold equation, bioimpedance and densitometry in older adults

Body composition analysis using bioelectric impedance in Bissau: reproducibility and level of agreement between two available devices

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF EQUATION FOR PREDICTING BODY COMPOSITION IN ELDERLY WOMEN

Reliability, agreement, and validity of digital weighing scale with MatScan in limb load measurement.

DESENVOLVIMENTO E VALIDAÇÃO DE EQUAÇÕES PARA PREDIÇÃO DA COMPOSIÇÃO CORPORAL EM IDOSAS

COMPARISON OF BALANCE AND MUSCLE STRENGTH IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING OLDER ADULTS CLASSIFIED BY THE PHYSICAL FRAILTY PHENOTYPE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

MUSCLE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT TOOLS FOR HOSPITALIZED OLDER ADULTS

Body Composition Analyses in Older Adults May Vary Significantly Depending on the Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer Modality

Performance of a Novel Handheld Bioelectrical Impedance Device for Assessing Muscle Mass in Older Inpatients

Comparisons between Bioelectrical Impedance Variables, Functional Tests and Blood Markers Based on BMI in Older Women and Their Association with Phase Angle

Bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual x-ray absorptiometry agreement for skeletal muscle mass index evaluation in sarcopenia diagnosis

Assessment of postural stability using the Zebris Platform in women above the age of 60

Comparison of bioelectrical impedance consumer device with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of muscle mass in Chinese geriatric inpatients

Association of different bioimpedanciometry estimations of muscle mass with functional measures

Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Mass in Older People: Comparison Between 2 Anthropometry-Based Methods and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry

Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for estimating limb lean mass in free-living Caucasian elderly people

Evaluation of a body height and weight harmony among university students

Respiratory Function Correlates with Fat Mass Index and Blood Triglycerides in Institutionalized Older Individuals

BIA-assessed cellular hydration and strength in healthy older adults