Development and Validation of Estimation Equations for Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Yun Sun,Tongtong Yin,Mengli Li,Fangfang Wang,Jiaying Qi,Hui Zhang,Li Wang,Jiehua Zhao,Yu Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s440967
IF: 3.829
2024-02-16
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Abstract:Yun Sun, 1, &ast Tongtong Yin, 2, &ast Mengli Li, 2, 3 Fangfang Wang, 2 Jiaying Qi, 2 Hui Zhang, 2, 4 Li Wang, 2 Jiehua Zhao, 5 Yu Zhang 5 1 Department of Oncology, Suzhou BenQ Medical Center, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Nursing, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; 3 School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hongkong, People's Republic of China; 4 School of Nursing, Vocational Health College, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; 5 Department of Nursing, Suzhou BenQ Medical Center, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Yu Zhang; Jiehua Zhao, Email ; Purpose: This study aimed to establish equations for estimating muscle mass through anthropometric parameters or together with physical function parameters in the community-dwelling older adults, providing a simple way of muscle mass assessment. Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, a total of 1537 older adults were recruited from the community and accepted the measurements of height, weight, upper arm and calf circumferences, grip strength, and walking speed. Body composition including appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Participants were randomly divided into the development or validation group. Stepwise multiple linear regression was applied to develop equations in the development group. Thereafter, Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, paired t -test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired-samples t -tests were used to assess the validity of the equations. Results: All parameters were significantly correlated with ASM ( r = 0.195~0.795, P < 0.001) except for the age in the validation group ( P = 0.746). The most optimal anthropometric equation was: [adjusted R 2 = 0.911, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 1.311, P < 0.001]. Comparatively speaking, this equation showed high correlation coefficient ( r = 0.951, P < 0.001) and ICC (ICC = 0.950, P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between BIA-measured ASM and the estimated ASM. The Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean difference between the estimated ASM and BIA-measured ASM was 0 kg and the limits of agreement of ASM was − 2.70~2.60 kg. Furthermore, inclusion of physical function did not significantly improve the adjusted R 2 and SEE. Conclusion: The anthropometric equation offers a practical alternative simple and dependable method for estimating ASM in community-dwelling older adults. Keywords: appendicular muscle mass, anthropometry, physical function, estimation equation, older adults Muscles are the foundation of human physiological activities, and muscle mass is closely associated with physical function, quality of life, and overall health. 1 Research has shown that muscle mass reaches its peak around the age of 25 and gradually declines after the age of 35. 2 After the age of 50, muscle mass loss ranges from 1% to 2% per year, with even more pronounced decline in older adults. 2 Insufficient muscle mass hinders the normal movement of joints, leading to functional impairments such as falls 3 and fragility fractures 4 in older adults, triggering a series of adverse health events. The reduction in muscle mass is also one of the diagnosis criteria for sarcopenia, 5 which is known to be more prevalent in older populations 6 and associated with a wide range of adverse outcomes including heart failure, 7 increased risk of falls 8 and mortality. 9 Therefore, timely and convenient assessment of muscle mass in the older adults is crucial. Although there is currently no global consensus on diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia, 10–13 assessment of muscle mass is mainly achieved through bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). 6 However, the instruments required for these methods are expensive and bulky, and the operating procedures require strict training, which limits their application in community settings. Therefore, exploring simple and inexpensive methods for assessing muscle mass will help community healthcare workers and residents quickly assess their health status. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) which refers to the skeletal muscle mass of -Abstract Truncated-
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology