Applying deep learning in football ankle injury for value of high-power magnetic resonance bioimaging evaluation
Jun Xie,Jianwei Zhang,Shuang Liu,Guohua Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-04004-y
IF: 3.3
2021-07-26
The Journal of Supercomputing
Abstract:This study was to evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction algorithm based on convolutional neural network (CNN) in the diagnosis of ankle injury of football player. An MRI image reconstruction algorithm based on CNN (CNN-MRI) was constructed, and it was compared with the generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA), iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space (SPIRiT), and simultaneous autocalibrating and k-space estimation (SAKE) in MRI image of patients with ankle injury. They were compared regarding MRI image reconstruction quality (image score, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM), root mean square error (RMSE), and running time) and the assessment accuracy for each lesion. The detection rate of ankle joint injury and evaluation accuracy of the bone contusion, ligament injury, tendon injury focus, and different stages of osteochondral injury of the patients were recorded. The reconstructed image score, PSNR, SSIM, RMSE, and running time were calculated accordingly. The results showed that the detection rates of osteochondral injury (97.58%), joint effusion (91.21%), and soft tissue swelling (93.47%) in the CNN-MRI group were higher than those in GRAPPA (81.14%, 74.24%, and 76.11%), SPIRiT (80.66%, 73.66%, and 74.87%), and SAKE (86.96%, 82.61%, and 80.5%) groups (P < 0.05). The number of patients with 5 scores of reconstructed images in the CNN-MRI group (19 cases) was remarkably higher than that in GRAPPA (12 cases), SPIRiT (11 cases), and SAKE groups (14 cases) (P < 0.05). PSNR and SSIM of reconstructed image of patients in CNN-MRI group were much higher in contrast to those in GRAPPA, SPIRiT, and SAKE groups (P < 0.05), while the RMSE and running time were much lower than other algorithms (P < 0.05). In addition, the accuracy of evaluating the osteochondral injury in stage I and stage II for the patients in the CNN-MRI group was obviously higher than that in GRAPPA, SPIRiT, and SAKE groups (P < 0.05). In short, CNN-MRI algorithm could greatly improve the quality and PSNR of MRI reconstructed images, shorten the running time, and had excellent performance in showing the details of tendon injury, ligament injury, and bone contusion lesions. Moreover, it had a good effect on image processing of football players, could improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of ankle joint injuries, and could assist clinicians in the imaging diagnosis of ankle joint injuries of the football players.
computer science, theory & methods,engineering, electrical & electronic, hardware & architecture