Abstract:Key event-related potentials (ERPs) of perceptual decision-making such as the centroparietal positivity (CPP) elucidate how evidence is accumulated towards a given choice. Furthermore, this accumulation can be impacted by visual target selection signals such as the N2 contralateral (N2c). How these underlying neural mechanisms of perceptual decision-making are influenced by the spatial congruence of distractors relative to target stimuli remains unclear. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) in humans of both sexes to investigate the effect of distractor spatial congruency (same vs. different hemifield relative to targets) on perceptual decision-making. We confirmed that responses for perceptual decisions were slower for spatially incongruent vs. congruent distractors of high salience. Similarly, markers of target selection (N2c peak amplitude) and evidence accumulation (CPP slope) were found to be lower when distractors were spatially incongruent vs. congruent. To evaluate the effects of congruency further, we applied drift diffusion modelling to participant responses, which showed that larger amplitudes of both ERPs were correlated with shorter non-decision times when considering the effect of congruency. The modelling also suggested that congruency's effect on behaviour occurred prior to and during evidence accumulation when considering the effects of the N2c peak and CPP slope. These findings point to spatially incongruent distractors, relative to congruent distractors, influencing decisions as early as the initial sensory processing phase, then continuing to exert an effect as evidence is accumulated throughout the decision-making process. Overall, our findings highlight how key electrophysiological signals of perceptual decision-making are influenced by the spatial congruence of target and distractor.Significance Statement When making perceptual decisions, we often need to focus on task-relevant targets while ignoring irrelevant distractors. In this study, we show that salient distractors in the opposite visual hemifield capture attention with consequences for the speed and accuracy of decisions. Electrophysiological signals of perceptual decision-making were attenuated by spatially incongruent distractors relative to congruent distractors. Computational modelling suggested that the influence of spatial congruency of target and distractor on the electrophysiological markers of target selection and evidence accumulation occurred during the initial sensory processing phase preceding evidence accumulation, which continued as evidence was accumulated throughout the decision process. Our findings, therefore, suggest that the spatial congruence of target and distractor impacts the dynamics of electrophysiological signals of perceptual decision-making.

The relative attractiveness of distractors and targets affects the coming and going of item-specific control: Evidence from flanker tasks

Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect

Flanker tasks based on congruency manipulation are biased measures of selective attention in perceptual load studies

Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context

The list-wide proportion congruency effect is larger when the distractor precedes the target: Evidence for conflict-independent control in the prime-probe task

Electrophysiological correlates of proportion congruency manipulation in a temporal flanker task

Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict – controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect

The influence of task-irrelevant color perception on flanker task performance: Insights from behavioral and ERP data

Attentional Selection Within and Across Hemispheres: Implications for the Perceptual Load Theory

Attentional set and explicit expectations of perceptual load determine flanker interference.

Perceptual Load,Top-down Attentional Set and Selective Attention

The conflict adaptation is affected by attentional strategies: evidence from the arrow flanker task

Cognitive control controls the effect of irrelevant stimulus-response learning

List-level control in the flanker task

The effect of congruent vs. incongruent distractor positioning on electrophysiological signals during perceptual decision-making

The stimulus representation of unconscious information and its temporal characteristics

Perceptual grouping and visual selective attention

Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.

The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks

Individual differences in attention allocation during a two-dimensional inhibitory control task

Can attentional control settings be maintained for two color-location conjunctions? Evidence from an RSVP task