The methodology of profit maximization: An Austrian alternative
William L. Anderson,Ronald L. Ross
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-005-1002-9
2005-12-01
The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Abstract:While the MR=MC profit-maximizing model that is used almost religiously by the economics profession has been challenged over the years, it still remains the dominant model to explain firm behavior. However, its popularity does not mean that the model accurately describes what actually occurs in firm decision making. Given that modern mainstream neoclassical economists have failed (through omission or commission) to examine their models through the lens of time, they have lost that component that presents accuracy and enrichment to their arguments.This paper has incorporated challenges to the dominant neoclassical model that were fashioned by Rothbard and, to a much lesser extent, Baumol. In examining the work of both economists, we conclude that the Rothbard model is more complete, as it factors time into the model, where Baumol’s does not, which renders it fatally incomplete. Both authors, however, make a solid point that if one is to analyze the workings of the firm in the real world, other models such as revenue maximization must be taken into account if we are to assume that firms attempt to maximize profits.To be sure, there is much work to be done in the creation of alternative theories of the firm. Klein and others have attempted to build upon the work of Mises and Rothbard to construct a theory of the firm that can stand up to intellectual scrutiny and explain the various aspects of the decision making process within the firm. We attempt through this paper to add to this alternative theoretical construct.