Abstract:Background: Innovative automated perfusion software solutions offer support in the management of acute stroke by providing information about the infarct core and penumbra. While the performance of different software solutions has mainly been investigated in patients with successful recanalization, the prognostic accuracy of the hypoperfusion maps in cases of futile recanalization has hardly been validated. Methods: In 39 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation and poor revascularization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 0-2a) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT), hypoperfusion analysis was performed using three different automated perfusion software solutions (A: RAPID, B: Brainomix e-CTP, C: Syngo.via). The hypoperfusion volumes (HV) as Tmax > 6 s were compared with the final infarct volumes (FIV) on follow-up CT 36−48 h after futile recanalization. Bland−Altman analysis was applied to display the levels of agreement and to evaluate systematic differences. Based on the median hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR, volumetric ratio of tissue with a Tmax > 10 s and Tmax > 6 s) patients were dichotomized into high- and low-HIR groups. Subgroup analysis with favorable (<0.6) and unfavorable (≥0.6) HIR was performed with respect to the FIV. HIR was correlated to clinical baseline and outcome parameters using Pearson’s correlation. Results: Overall, there was good correlation without significant differences between the HVs and the FIVs with package A (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) being slightly superior to B and C. However, levels of agreement were very wide for all software applications in Bland-Altman analysis. In cases of large infarcts exceeding 150 mL the performance of the automated software solutions generally decreased. Subgroup analysis revealed the FIV to be generally underestimated in patients with HIR ≥ 0.6 (p < 0.05). In the subgroup with favorable HIR, however, there was a trend towards an overestimation of the FIV. Nevertheless, packages A and B showed good correlation between the HVs and FIVs without significant differences (p > 0.2), while only package C significantly overestimated the FIV (−54.6 ± 56.0 mL, p = 0.001). The rate of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0−3 after 3 months was significantly higher in favorable vs. unfavorable HIR (42.1% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.02). Lower HIR was associated with higher Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) at presentation and on follow-up imaging, lower risk of malignant edema, and better outcome (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Overall, the performance of the automated perfusion software solutions to predict the FIV after futile recanalization is good, with decreasing accuracy in large infarcts exceeding 150 mL. However, depending on the HIR, FIV can be significantly over- and underestimated, with Syngo showing the widest range. Our results indicate that the HIR can serve as valuable parameter for outcome predictions and facilitate the decision whether or not to perform MT in delicate cases.

Imaging Selection in Ischemic Stroke: Feasibility of Automated CT-Perfusion Analysis

Abstract WP248: Pre-treatment Perfusion CT in Stroke Thrombolysis Can Predict Disability-free Life

Effect of Computed Tomography Vs. Computed Tomography Perfusion on Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcomes Within 6 Hours.

Perfusion Computed Tomography in Patients with Stroke Thrombolysis.

Abstract WMP18: CT Work-Up of Patients Suspected of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Perfusion-CT Adds Value Compared to Clinical Evaluation, Noncontrast Head CT and CT-Angiogram in Terms of Predicting Outcome

Computed Tomography Workup of Patients Suspected of Acute Ischemic Stroke

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY PERFUSION IN ACUTE STROKE ASSESSMENT

Utility of automated CT perfusion software in acute ischemic stroke with large and medium vessel occlusion

Computed Tomography Workup Of Patients Suspected Of Acute Ischemic Stroke Perfusion Computed Tomography Adds Value Compared With Clinical Evaluation, Noncontrast Computed Tomography, And Computed Tomography Angiogram In Terms Of Predicting Outcome

CT Perfusion with Increased Temporal Sampling Interval to Predict Target Mismatch Status in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Assessing the Relative Value of CT Perfusion Compared to Non-contrast CT and CT Angiography in Prognosticating Reperfusion-Eligible Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Clinical uncertainty in large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: does automated perfusion imaging make a difference? An intra-rater and inter-rater agreement study

Thrombectomy in Patients With Ischemic Stroke Without Salvageable Tissue on CT Perfusion

Use of ABC/2 Method for Rapidly Estimating the Target Mismatch on Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Advances in Cerebral Perfusion Imaging Techniques in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract TP132: Optimal CT Perfusion Post-Processing Method in Posterior Circulation Stroke

Abstract TMP59: Automated Analysis of Dynamic Computed Tomographic Angiography Perfusion Maps Accurately Identifies Regional Hypoperfusion in Minor Stroke Patients

Simplified stroke imaging selection modality for endovascular thrombectomy in the extended time window: systematic review and meta-analysis

Perfusion CT and acute stroke imaging: foundations, applications, and literature review

Comparison of Computed Tomography Perfusion and Multiphase Computed Tomography Angiogram in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Endovascular Thrombectomy

Prognostic Accuracy of CTP Summary Maps in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusive Stroke and Poor Revascularization after Mechanical Thrombectomy-Comparison of Three Automated Perfusion Software Applications