Rules and Dominant Party Regimes

Graeme Gill
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192849687.003.0006
2021-11-20
Abstract:This chapter examines how rules have operated in two electoral authoritarian dominant party regimes, Malaysia under Mahathir (1981–2003) and Mexico under the Institutional Revolutionary Party (1929–2000). The nature of the party, one designed to participate in a competitive electoral process (even if unfair because it is tilted in favour of the ruling party), is an important factor in shaping the rules and how they worked. The fact that one is a parliamentary and the other a presidential system also provides scope to see how institutions affect rules and their performance.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?