Unique Roles of the Non-identical MCM Subunits in DNA Replication Licensing
Yuanliang Zhai,Ningning Li,Hanlun Jiang,Xuhui Huang,Ning Gao,Bik Kwoon Tye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.016
IF: 16
2017-01-01
Molecular Cell
Abstract:A family of six homologous subunits, Mcm2, -3, -4, -5, -6, and -7, each with its own unique features, forms the catalytic core of the eukaryotic replicative helicase. The necessity of six similar but non-identical subunits has been a mystery since its initial discovery. Recent cryo-EM structures of the Mcm2–7 (MCM) double hexamer, its precursors, and the origin recognition complex (ORC)-Cdc6-Cdt1-Mcm2–7 (OCCM) intermediate showed that each of these subunits plays a distinct role in orchestrating the assembly of the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) by ORC-Cdc6 and Cdt1. A family of six homologous subunits, Mcm2, -3, -4, -5, -6, and -7, each with its own unique features, forms the catalytic core of the eukaryotic replicative helicase. The necessity of six similar but non-identical subunits has been a mystery since its initial discovery. Recent cryo-EM structures of the Mcm2–7 (MCM) double hexamer, its precursors, and the origin recognition complex (ORC)-Cdc6-Cdt1-Mcm2–7 (OCCM) intermediate showed that each of these subunits plays a distinct role in orchestrating the assembly of the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) by ORC-Cdc6 and Cdt1. The Replicon Model of DNA replication, beginning with the binding of an initiator at a replication origin followed by the recruitment of other replication proteins that unwind and replicate DNA from the origin (Jacob et al., 1964Jacob F. Brenner S. Cuzin F. On the regulation of DNA replication in bacteria.Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1964; 28: 329-348Crossref Google Scholar), is shared in all three kingdoms of life. However, the details of how this process is achieved have diverged considerably (reviewed by Bleichert et al., 2017Bleichert F. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. Mechanisms for initiating cellular DNA replication.Science. 2017; 355: eaah6317Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar). Briefly, in prokaryotes, DnaA binds multiple motifs at the replication origin and oligomerizes to form a supra-nucleoprotein structure that melts the adjacent AT-rich region to form an initiation bubble (Bramhill and Kornberg, 1988Bramhill D. Kornberg A. Duplex opening by dnaA protein at novel sequences in initiation of replication at the origin of the E. coli chromosome.Cell. 1988; 52: 743-755Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (513) Google Scholar, Duderstadt et al., 2011Duderstadt K.E. Chuang K. Berger J.M. DNA stretching by bacterial initiators promotes replication origin opening.Nature. 2011; 478: 209-213Crossref PubMed Scopus (146) Google Scholar, Gille and Messer, 1991Gille H. Messer W. Localized DNA melting and structural pertubations in the origin of replication, oriC, of Escherichia coli in vitro and in vivo.EMBO J. 1991; 10: 1579-1584Crossref PubMed Scopus (110) Google Scholar, Richardson et al., 2016Richardson T.T. Harran O. Murray H. The bacterial DnaA-trio replication origin element specifies single-stranded DNA initiator binding.Nature. 2016; 534: 412-416Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar, Speck and Messer, 2001Speck C. Messer W. Mechanism of origin unwinding: sequential binding of DnaA to double- and single-stranded DNA.EMBO J. 2001; 20: 1469-1476Crossref PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar). The DnaB helicase in the form of a hexameric ring is loaded one each on opposite lagging strands by the helicase loader, DnaC (Arias-Palomo et al., 2013Arias-Palomo E. O'Shea V.L. Hood I.V. Berger J.M. The bacterial DnaC helicase loader is a DnaB ring breaker.Cell. 2013; 153: 438-448Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar). In eukaryotes, initiation of DNA replication begins with the binding of the origin recognition complex (ORC) and Cdc6 to replication origins. Unlike the prokaryotic initiator that melts origin DNA (Bleichert et al., 2017Bleichert F. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. Mechanisms for initiating cellular DNA replication.Science. 2017; 355: eaah6317Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar), in the budding yeast, ORC-Cdc6 only plays the role of origin recognition (Duzdevich et al., 2015Duzdevich D. Warner M.D. Ticau S. Ivica N.A. Bell S.P. Greene E.C. The dynamics of eukaryotic replication initiation: origin specificity, licensing, and firing at the single-molecule level.Mol. Cell. 2015; 58: 483-494Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar, Mizushima et al., 2000Mizushima T. Takahashi N. Stillman B. Cdc6p modulates the structure and DNA binding activity of the origin recognition complex in vitro.Genes Dev. 2000; 14: 1631-1641PubMed Google Scholar, Speck and Stillman, 2007Speck C. Stillman B. Cdc6 ATPase activity regulates ORC x Cdc6 stability and the selection of specific DNA sequences as origins of DNA replication.J. Biol. Chem. 2007; 282: 11705-11714Crossref PubMed Scopus (70) Google Scholar) and a scaffold for assembling the 12-subunit Mcm2–7 double hexamer (DH) (Evrin et al., 2009Evrin C. Clarke P. Zech J. Lurz R. Sun J. Uhle S. Li H. Stillman B. Speck C. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009; 106: 20240-20245Crossref PubMed Scopus (387) Google Scholar, Remus et al., 2009Remus D. Beuron F. Tolun G. Griffith J.D. Morris E.P. Diffley J.F. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing.Cell. 2009; 139: 719-730Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (474) Google Scholar), known as the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) that licenses replication origins. Melting of origin DNA appears to be carried out during the transition of the inert Mcm2–7 (MCM) DH to form a pair of bidirectional replicative helicases (Li et al., 2015Li N. Zhai Y. Zhang Y. Li W. Yang M. Lei J. Tye B.K. Gao N. Structure of the eukaryotic MCM complex at 3.8 Å.Nature. 2015; 524: 186-191Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar, Martinez et al., 2017Martinez M.P. Wacker A.L. Bruck I. Kaplan D.L. Eukaryotic replicative helicase subunit interaction with DNA and its role in DNA replication.Genes (Basel). 2017; 8: E117Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar, Parker et al., 2017Parker M.W. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. Mechanisms and regulation of DNA replication initiation in eukaryotes.Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017; 52: 107-144Crossref PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar). The biochemistry and genetics on this subject accumulated throughout the years suggest that this process is much more complicated in eukaryotes, and they have been summarized periodically by in-depth reviews (Bell and Labib, 2016Bell S.P. Labib K. Chromosome duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Genetics. 2016; 203: 1027-1067Crossref PubMed Scopus (211) Google Scholar, Costa et al., 2013Costa A. Hood I.V. Berger J.M. Mechanisms for initiating cellular DNA replication.Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013; 82: 25-54Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar, Deegan and Diffley, 2016Deegan T.D. Diffley J.F. MCM: one ring to rule them all.Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2016; 37: 145-151Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar, Samson and Bell, 2013Samson R.Y. Bell S.D. MCM loading—an open-and-shut case?.Mol. Cell. 2013; 50: 457-458Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar). Putting these disjointed pieces of information together without a structural framework has been difficult. Extrapolating from the simpler models of archaea, which have homologs of Orc1/Cdc6 and Mcm, has been useful (Chong et al., 2000Chong J.P. Hayashi M.K. Simon M.N. Xu R.M. Stillman B. A double-hexamer archaeal minichromosome maintenance protein is an ATP-dependent DNA helicase.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000; 97: 1530-1535Crossref PubMed Scopus (260) Google Scholar, Samson and Bell, 2016Samson R.Y. Bell S.D. Chapter Five: archaeal DNA replication origins and recruitment of the MCM replicative helicase.in: Laurie S.K. Marcos Túlio O. The Enzymes. Academic Press, 2016: 169-190Google Scholar, Slaymaker and Chen, 2012Slaymaker I.M. Chen X.S. MCM structure and mechanics: what we have learned from archaeal MCM.in: MacNeill S. The Eukaryotic Replisome: a Guide to Protein Structure and Function. Springer Netherlands, 2012: 89-111Crossref Scopus (28) Google Scholar), especially with the early crystal structures of portions of these proteins (Fletcher et al., 2003Fletcher R.J. Bishop B.E. Leon R.P. Sclafani R.A. Ogata C.M. Chen X.S. The structure and function of MCM from archaeal M. thermoautotrophicum.Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003; 10: 160-167Crossref PubMed Scopus (264) Google Scholar, Miller and Enemark, 2015Miller J.M. Enemark E.J. Archaeal MCM proteins as an analog for the eukaryotic Mcm2-7 helicase to reveal essential features of structure and function.Archaea. 2015; 2015: 305497Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar). However, the simplified model exactly lacks the intricacies of eukaryotes that have puzzled researchers. High-resolution structures of the eukaryote replication machinery are key to assembling this elaborate puzzle. Until only very recently, sub-nanometer high-resolution structures of the critical components of the DNA replication initiation molecular assembly were rare (Table 1). With the advent of the resolution revolution of cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM), a few of these critical structures became available. In particular, the Mcm2–7 single hexamer (MCM-SH) (7.3 Å) (Zhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar), the Cdt1-Mcm2–7 (CM) heptamer (7.1 Å) (Zhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar), the ORC-Cdc6-Cdt1-Mcm2–7 (OCCM) intermediate (3.9 Å) (Yuan et al., 2017Yuan Z. Riera A. Bai L. Sun J. Nandi S. Spanos C. Chen Z.A. Barbon M. Rappsilber J. Stillman B. et al.Structural basis of Mcm2-7 replicative helicase loading by ORC-Cdc6 and Cdt1.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 316-324Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar), and the Mcm2–7 double hexamer (MCM-DH) (3.8 Å) (Li et al., 2015Li N. Zhai Y. Zhang Y. Li W. Yang M. Lei J. Tye B.K. Gao N. Structure of the eukaryotic MCM complex at 3.8 Å.Nature. 2015; 524: 186-191Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar) provide a series of snapshots that show a glimpse of the sequence of events that leads to replication licensing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This exciting development provides the much-needed structural framework to organize the wealth of genetic and biochemical details that researchers have accumulated. In this review, we try to integrate the many seemingly disjointed pieces of biochemical and genetic information into these snapshots to produce two animated sequels of the assembly process of the MCM-DH. Throughout this exercise, we point out the missing links and speculative hypotheses used to fill the gaps, hopeful and mindful that a fuller and more accurate picture will be forthcoming.Table 1Structures Related to DNA Replication LicensingReplication ComplexSourceSize (MDa)Resolution (Å)MethodEMD or PDB (Special Feature)ReferenceOrigin recognition complexOrc1-5yeast0.3625NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 5013Chen et al., 2008Chen Z. Speck C. Wendel P. Tang C. Stillman B. Li H. The architecture of the DNA replication origin recognition complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008; 105: 10326-10331Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google ScholarOrc1-6fly0.3922NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 2479Bleichert et al., 2013Bleichert F. Balasov M. Chesnokov I. Nogales E. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. A Meier-Gorlin syndrome mutation in a conserved C-terminal helix of Orc6 impedes origin recognition complex formation.eLife. 2013; 2: e00882Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholartrimmed Orc1-6fly0.283.5X-ray diffractionPDB: 4xgcBleichert et al., 2015Bleichert F. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic origin recognition complex.Nature. 2015; 519: 321-326Crossref PubMed Scopus (97) Google Scholartrimmed Orc1-5human0.2818cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 8541; PDB: 5ujmTocilj et al., 2017Tocilj A. On K.F. Yuan Z. Sun J. Elkayam E. Li H. Stillman B. Joshua-Tor L. Structure of the active form of human origin recognition complex and its ATPase motor module.eLife. 2017; 6: e20818Crossref PubMed Google Scholartrimmed Orc1/4/5human0.163.39X-ray diffractionPDB: 5uj7Tocilj et al., 2017Tocilj A. On K.F. Yuan Z. Sun J. Elkayam E. Li H. Stillman B. Joshua-Tor L. Structure of the active form of human origin recognition complex and its ATPase motor module.eLife. 2017; 6: e20818Crossref PubMed Google Scholartrimmed Orc2/3human0.126X-ray diffractionPDB: 5uj8Tocilj et al., 2017Tocilj A. On K.F. Yuan Z. Sun J. Elkayam E. Li H. Stillman B. Joshua-Tor L. Structure of the active form of human origin recognition complex and its ATPase motor module.eLife. 2017; 6: e20818Crossref PubMed Google ScholarORC-Cdc6-DNAyeast0.515cryo-EM (200 kV)EMD: 5381Sun et al., 2012Sun J. Kawakami H. Zech J. Speck C. Stillman B. Li H. Cdc6-induced conformational changes in ORC bound to origin DNA revealed by cryo-electron microscopy.Structure. 2012; 20: 534-544Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (59) Google ScholarMcm2–7fly0.5433NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 1834Costa et al., 2011Costa A. Ilves I. Tamberg N. Petojevic T. Nogales E. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011; 18: 471-477Crossref PubMed Scopus (257) Google Scholarfly0.5435NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 1835Costa et al., 2011Costa A. Ilves I. Tamberg N. Petojevic T. Nogales E. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011; 18: 471-477Crossref PubMed Scopus (257) Google Scholarhuman0.56723NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 2872Hesketh et al., 2015Hesketh E.L. Parker-Manuel R.P. Chaban Y. Satti R. Coverley D. Orlova E.V. Chong J.P. DNA induces conformational changes in a recombinant human minichromosome maintenance complex.J. Biol. Chem. 2015; 290: 7973-7979Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholarhuman0.56723NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 2873 (DNA bound)Hesketh et al., 2015Hesketh E.L. Parker-Manuel R.P. Chaban Y. Satti R. Coverley D. Orlova E.V. Chong J.P. DNA induces conformational changes in a recombinant human minichromosome maintenance complex.J. Biol. Chem. 2015; 290: 7973-7979Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholaryeast0.6068cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 6673 (AMPPNP bound)Zhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholaryeast0.6067.3cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 6674 (ADP bound)Zhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google ScholarCdt1-Mcm2–7yeast0.6757.1cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 6671 (AMPPNP bound); PDB: 5h7iZhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholaryeast0.6757.1cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 6672 (ADP bound)Zhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google ScholarORC-Cdc6-Cdt1-Mcm2–7 (OCCM)yeast1.114cryo-EM (200 kV)EMD: 5625Sun et al., 2013Sun J. Evrin C. Samel S.A. Fernández-Cid A. Riera A. Kawakami H. Stillman B. Speck C. Li H. Cryo-EM structure of a helicase loading intermediate containing ORC-Cdc6-Cdt1-MCM2-7 bound to DNA.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013; 20: 944-951Crossref PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholaryeast1.13.9cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 8540; PDB: 5udbYuan et al., 2017Yuan Z. Riera A. Bai L. Sun J. Nandi S. Spanos C. Chen Z.A. Barbon M. Rappsilber J. Stillman B. et al.Structural basis of Mcm2-7 replicative helicase loading by ORC-Cdc6 and Cdt1.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 316-324Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google ScholarMcm2–7 double hexameryeast1.230NS-EM (120 kV)data not depositedRemus et al., 2009Remus D. Beuron F. Tolun G. Griffith J.D. Morris E.P. Diffley J.F. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing.Cell. 2009; 139: 719-730Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (474) Google Scholaryeast1.215cryo-EM (200 kV)EMD: 5857Sun et al., 2014Sun J. Fernandez-Cid A. Riera A. Tognetti S. Yuan Z. Stillman B. Speck C. Li H. Structural and mechanistic insights into Mcm2-7 double-hexamer assembly and function.Genes Dev. 2014; 28: 2291-2303Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholaryeast1.23.8cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 6338; PDB: 3ja8Li et al., 2015Li N. Zhai Y. Zhang Y. Li W. Yang M. Lei J. Tye B.K. Gao N. Structure of the eukaryotic MCM complex at 3.8 Å.Nature. 2015; 524: 186-191Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar Open table in a new tab The MCM mutants were named after the minichromosome maintenance screen designed to identify replication initiation mutants in yeast (Gibson et al., 1990Gibson S.I. Surosky R.T. Tye B.K. The phenotype of the minichromosome maintenance mutant mcm3 is characteristic of mutants defective in DNA replication.Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990; 10: 5707-5720Crossref PubMed Scopus (112) Google Scholar, Maine et al., 1984Maine G.T. Sinha P. Tye B.K. Mutants of S. cerevisiae defective in the maintenance of minichromosomes.Genetics. 1984; 106: 365-385Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Although multiple homologs of the MCM proteins or mutants were identified in different organisms often based on phenotypes unrelated to DNA replication functions (Holthoff et al., 1996Holthoff H.P. Hameister H. Knippers R. A novel human Mcm protein: homology to the yeast replication protein Mis5 and chromosomal location.Genomics. 1996; 37: 131-134Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar, Kubota et al., 1997Kubota Y. Mimura S. Nishimoto S. Masuda T. Nojima H. Takisawa H. Licensing of DNA replication by a multi-protein complex of MCM/P1 proteins in Xenopus eggs.EMBO J. 1997; 16: 3320-3331Crossref PubMed Scopus (94) Google Scholar, Moir et al., 1982Moir D. Stewart S.E. Osmond B.C. Botstein D. Cold-sensitive cell-division-cycle mutants of yeast: isolation, properties, and pseudoreversion studies.Genetics. 1982; 100: 547-563Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), only six of them were ubiquitous to all eukaryotes from yeast to human. They were named Mcm2, Mcm3, Mcm4, Mcm5, Mcm6, and Mcm7. Despite their similarity, early yeast studies showed that each was indispensable for growth (Yan et al., 1991Yan H. Gibson S. Tye B.K. Mcm2 and Mcm3, two proteins important for ARS activity, are related in structure and function.Genes Dev. 1991; 5: 944-957Crossref PubMed Scopus (153) Google Scholar) and for DNA replication (Labib et al., 2000Labib K. Tercero J.A. Diffley J.F. Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression.Science. 2000; 288: 1643-1647Crossref PubMed Scopus (523) Google Scholar). Since a single homolog identified in the archaea can form a hexameric ring helicase, an immediate curiosity was why eukaryotes need six homologous subunits to form a heterohexameric ring helicase. A sequence and structural comparison of the six eukaryotic MCM homologs with the archaeal homolog shows that the core that defines the structural NTD (N-terminal domain) and CTD (C-terminal domain) as well as the catalytic function of the MCM helicase is highly conserved (Figure 1A; Figure S1). Both the archaeal and the eukaryotic MCMs also contain CTEs (C-terminal extensions) (magenta), but these domains appear to be highly divergent both in sequence and in length (Figure 1A; Figure S1). Features absent from the archaeal MCM are the NTEs (N-terminal extensions) (lime green), NTIs (N-terminal insertions), N-C linker insertions, and CTIs (C-terminal insertions) (red) (Figure 1A). All of these elements are unique in sequence among members of the MCM family but mostly conserved with some exceptions among individual homologs across species (Figure S1), suggesting that they play conserved and specific roles. Four MCM-related cryo-EM structures, Mcm2–7, CM, OCCM, and the DH that became available recently provide a trove of information of how the MCM-DH is assembled by ORC-Cdc6. In particular, since Cdt1-MCM is the precursor of OCCM and OCCM is the precursor of MCM-DH, these structures inform how the unique elements of each of the MCMs behave during the assembly process. Figure 2 illustrates the precursor-product relationship of these transitional structures in different views, starting from top to bottom. If we first focus on the CTEs, in the CM heptamer (Figures 1B and 2E–2H), which is a left-handed open coil with a narrow gate of 10–15 Å, only the CTEs of Mcm2, Mcm4, Mcm5, and Mcm6 are structured (Figure 1B, in magenta). The Mcm5-CTE deposits its wing helix domain (WHD) in the central channel (Figures 2A, 2B, 2E, 2F, and 3E–3G ), while the CTEs of Mcm4 and Mcm6 form a pseudo-dimer above the core of the coil (Figures 2B, 2D, 2F, and 2H). The narrow gate and the spatial arrangement of the CTEs of Mcm4 and Mcm5 largely block the entry of duplex DNA into the MCM coil (Figures 2E, 2F, and 3E–3G). Consistent with these structural features, biochemical studies show that the CM heptamer cannot be loaded onto double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) spontaneously (Bochman and Schwacha, 2007Bochman M.L. Schwacha A. Differences in the single-stranded DNA binding activities of MCM2-7 and MCM467: MCM2 and MCM5 define a slow ATP-dependent step.J. Biol. Chem. 2007; 282: 33795-33804Crossref PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar, Bowers et al., 2004Bowers J.L. Randell J.C. Chen S. Bell S.P. ATP hydrolysis by ORC catalyzes reiterative Mcm2-7 assembly at a defined origin of replication.Mol. Cell. 2004; 16: 967-978Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (195) Google Scholar, Coster et al., 2014Coster G. Frigola J. Beuron F. Morris E.P. Diffley J.F. Origin licensing requires ATP binding and hydrolysis by the MCM replicative helicase.Mol. Cell. 2014; 55: 666-677Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar, Evrin et al., 2009Evrin C. Clarke P. Zech J. Lurz R. Sun J. Uhle S. Li H. Stillman B. Speck C. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009; 106: 20240-20245Crossref PubMed Scopus (387) Google Scholar, Frigola et al., 2013Frigola J. Remus D. Mehanna A. Diffley J.F. ATPase-dependent quality control of DNA replication origin licensing.Nature. 2013; 495: 339-343Crossref PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar, Heller et al., 2011Heller R.C. Kang S. Lam W.M. Chen S. Chan C.S. Bell S.P. Eukaryotic origin-dependent DNA replication in vitro reveals sequential action of DDK and S-CDK kinases.Cell. 2011; 146: 80-91Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (232) Google Scholar, Kang et al., 2014Kang S. Warner M.D. Bell S.P. Multiple functions for Mcm2-7 ATPase motifs during replication initiation.Mol. Cell. 2014; 55: 655-665Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar, Remus et al., 2009Remus D. Beuron F. Tolun G. Griffith J.D. Morris E.P. Diffley J.F. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing.Cell. 2009; 139: 719-730Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (474) Google Scholar).Figure 3Rearrangements of the MCM CTEs during MCM LoadingShow full caption(A and B) Front and back views of the OCCM structure (PDB: 5udb). Highlighted in colors are CTEs in (A) and the gate-forming subunits Mcm2 and Mcm5 in (B).(C) Contact surfaces created by ORC and Cdc6 for WHDs of M3 and M7.(D) Cdc6 and DNA contact points in OC.(E–G) Steric hindrance for MCM loading imposed by the CTEs from Mcm4, Mcm5, and Mcm6 of the Cdt1-MCM heptamer (PDB: 5h7i). The structures of the Cdt1-MCM and the OCCM were superimposed by aligning the Mcm2-CTD. (E) Side view shows the superimposed structures of OC-DNA (in gray) derived from OCCM and the cWHDs (color coded) from Cdt1-MCM heptamer. (F) Top view shows the aligned structures in (E). Outline traces the contour of OC. During the transition from Cdt1-Mcm to OCCM, the cWHDs of Mcm4, 5, and 6 undergo translocation as indicated by arrows, while the CTEs of Mcm3 and 7 form structured cWHD. (G) The putative pathway of Mcm5-cWHD translocation in transitioning from Cdt1-MCM to OCCM is shown. The lower position indicates the initial location of Mcm5-WHD in the Cdt1-MCM using Mcm2-CTD as reference for alignment with OCCM; the upper position is its intermediate location using Mcm5-CTD as reference for alignment. Further translation of the Mcm5-WHD is suggested as the arrow-headed direction.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) (A and B) Front and back views of the OCCM structure (PDB: 5udb). Highlighted in colors are CTEs in (A) and the gate-forming subunits Mcm2 and Mcm5 in (B). (C) Contact surfaces created by ORC and Cdc6 for WHDs of M3 and M7. (D) Cdc6 and DNA contact points in OC. (E–G) Steric hindrance for MCM loading imposed by the CTEs from Mcm4, Mcm5, and Mcm6 of the Cdt1-MCM heptamer (PDB: 5h7i). The structures of the Cdt1-MCM and the OCCM were superimposed by aligning the Mcm2-CTD. (E) Side view shows the superimposed structures of OC-DNA (in gray) derived from OCCM and the cWHDs (color coded) from Cdt1-MCM heptamer. (F) Top view shows the aligned structures in (E). Outline traces the contour of OC. During the transition from Cdt1-Mcm to OCCM, the cWHDs of Mcm4, 5, and 6 undergo translocation as indicated by arrows, while the CTEs of Mcm3 and 7 form structured cWHD. (G) The putative pathway of Mcm5-cWHD translocation in transitioning from Cdt1-MCM to OCCM is shown. The lower position indicates the initial location of Mcm5-WHD in the Cdt1-MCM using Mcm2-CTD as reference for alignment with OCCM; the upper position is its intermediate location using Mcm5-CTD as reference for alignment. Further translation of the Mcm5-WHD is suggested as the arrow-headed direction. In the OCCM, the previously non-discernible Mcm3-CTE becomes visible as a wing helix at the very end, extending well above the MCM CTD ring through a long flexible linker to lodge its C-terminal wing helix domain (cWHD) onto the surface created by Cdc6-Orc2 (Figures 1B, 1C, 2A–2L, 3A, and 3C). The role of Mcm3-cWHD in the docking of the MCM onto ORC-Cdc6 has been well documented (Frigola et al., 2013Frigola J. Remus D. Mehanna A. Diffley J.F. ATPase-dependent quality control of DNA replication origin licensing.Nature. 2013; 495: 339-343Crossref PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar). Previous study showed that truncation and mutations of the cWHD of Mcm3 block the loading of MCM onto ORC-Cdc6, precluding any interaction between ORC-Cdc6 (OC) and MCM. This result suggests that Mcm3-cWHD makes the first necessary contact between OC and MCM. Moreover, the Mcm3-CTE fragment alone can bind OC and activate its ATPase (Fernández-Cid et al., 2013Fernández-Cid A. Riera A. Tognetti S. Herrera M.C. Samel S. Evrin C. Winkler C. Gardenal E. Uhle S. Speck C. An ORC/Cdc6/MCM2-7 complex is formed in a multistep reaction to serve as a platform for MCM double-hexamer assembly.Mol. Cell. 2013; 50: 577-588Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar, Frigola et al., 2013Frigola J. Remus D. Mehanna A. Diffley J.F. ATPase-dependent quality control of DNA replication origin licensing.Nature. 2013; 495: 339-343Crossref PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar), which presumably triggers a series of allosteric conformational changes of the OC to engage with other MCM subunits. It is noteworthy that OCCM can be formed in the presence of ATP-γ-S, suggesting that, up to this point, assembly of this intermediate complex is largely independent of ATP hydrolysis by OC or Mcm2–7 (Fernández-Cid et al., 2013Fernández-Cid A. Riera A. Tognetti S. Herrera M.C. Samel S. Evrin C. Winkler C. Gardenal E. Uhle S. Speck C. An ORC/Cdc6/MCM2-7 complex is formed in a multistep reaction to serve as a platform for MCM double-hexamer assembly.Mol. Cell. 2013; 50: 577-588Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar, Frigola et al., 2013Frigola J. Remus D. Mehanna A. Diffley J.F. ATPase-dependent quality control of DNA replication origin licensing.Nature. 2013; 495: 339-343Crossref PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar, Sun et al., 2013Sun J. Evrin C. Samel S.A. Fernández-Cid A. Riera A. Kawakami H. Stillman B. Speck C. Li H. Cryo-EM structure of a helicase loading intermediate containing ORC-Cdc6-Cdt1-MCM2-7 bound to DNA.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013; 20: 944-951Crossref PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholar, Yuan et al., 2017Yuan Z. Riera A. Bai L. Sun J. Nandi S. Spanos C. Chen Z.A. Barbon M. Rappsilber J. Stillman B. et al.Structural basis of Mcm2-7 replicative helicase loading by ORC-Cdc6 and Cdt1.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 316-324Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar). Subsequent anchoring of the MCM to OC facilitated by the rearrangements of the cWHDs of other MCM subunits is evident by the structural comparison between CM and OCCM (Figures 3A, 3E, and 3F). The previously non-discernible Mcm7-CTE (Figures 1B, 2D, and 2H) is also visible as a structured WHD (Figures 1C, 2K, and 2L), and it binds to the surf