Unique Roles of the Non-identical MCM Subunits in DNA Replication Licensing
Yuanliang Zhai,Ningning Li,Hanlun Jiang,Xuhui Huang,Ning Gao,Bik Kwoon Tye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.016
IF: 16
2017-01-01
Molecular Cell
Abstract:A family of six homologous subunits, Mcm2, -3, -4, -5, -6, and -7, each with its own unique features, forms the catalytic core of the eukaryotic replicative helicase. The necessity of six similar but non-identical subunits has been a mystery since its initial discovery. Recent cryo-EM structures of the Mcm2–7 (MCM) double hexamer, its precursors, and the origin recognition complex (ORC)-Cdc6-Cdt1-Mcm2–7 (OCCM) intermediate showed that each of these subunits plays a distinct role in orchestrating the assembly of the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) by ORC-Cdc6 and Cdt1. A family of six homologous subunits, Mcm2, -3, -4, -5, -6, and -7, each with its own unique features, forms the catalytic core of the eukaryotic replicative helicase. The necessity of six similar but non-identical subunits has been a mystery since its initial discovery. Recent cryo-EM structures of the Mcm2–7 (MCM) double hexamer, its precursors, and the origin recognition complex (ORC)-Cdc6-Cdt1-Mcm2–7 (OCCM) intermediate showed that each of these subunits plays a distinct role in orchestrating the assembly of the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) by ORC-Cdc6 and Cdt1. The Replicon Model of DNA replication, beginning with the binding of an initiator at a replication origin followed by the recruitment of other replication proteins that unwind and replicate DNA from the origin (Jacob et al., 1964Jacob F. Brenner S. Cuzin F. On the regulation of DNA replication in bacteria.Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1964; 28: 329-348Crossref Google Scholar), is shared in all three kingdoms of life. However, the details of how this process is achieved have diverged considerably (reviewed by Bleichert et al., 2017Bleichert F. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. Mechanisms for initiating cellular DNA replication.Science. 2017; 355: eaah6317Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar). Briefly, in prokaryotes, DnaA binds multiple motifs at the replication origin and oligomerizes to form a supra-nucleoprotein structure that melts the adjacent AT-rich region to form an initiation bubble (Bramhill and Kornberg, 1988Bramhill D. Kornberg A. Duplex opening by dnaA protein at novel sequences in initiation of replication at the origin of the E. coli chromosome.Cell. 1988; 52: 743-755Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (513) Google Scholar, Duderstadt et al., 2011Duderstadt K.E. Chuang K. Berger J.M. DNA stretching by bacterial initiators promotes replication origin opening.Nature. 2011; 478: 209-213Crossref PubMed Scopus (146) Google Scholar, Gille and Messer, 1991Gille H. Messer W. Localized DNA melting and structural pertubations in the origin of replication, oriC, of Escherichia coli in vitro and in vivo.EMBO J. 1991; 10: 1579-1584Crossref PubMed Scopus (110) Google Scholar, Richardson et al., 2016Richardson T.T. Harran O. Murray H. The bacterial DnaA-trio replication origin element specifies single-stranded DNA initiator binding.Nature. 2016; 534: 412-416Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar, Speck and Messer, 2001Speck C. Messer W. Mechanism of origin unwinding: sequential binding of DnaA to double- and single-stranded DNA.EMBO J. 2001; 20: 1469-1476Crossref PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar). The DnaB helicase in the form of a hexameric ring is loaded one each on opposite lagging strands by the helicase loader, DnaC (Arias-Palomo et al., 2013Arias-Palomo E. O'Shea V.L. Hood I.V. Berger J.M. The bacterial DnaC helicase loader is a DnaB ring breaker.Cell. 2013; 153: 438-448Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar). In eukaryotes, initiation of DNA replication begins with the binding of the origin recognition complex (ORC) and Cdc6 to replication origins. Unlike the prokaryotic initiator that melts origin DNA (Bleichert et al., 2017Bleichert F. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. Mechanisms for initiating cellular DNA replication.Science. 2017; 355: eaah6317Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar), in the budding yeast, ORC-Cdc6 only plays the role of origin recognition (Duzdevich et al., 2015Duzdevich D. Warner M.D. Ticau S. Ivica N.A. Bell S.P. Greene E.C. The dynamics of eukaryotic replication initiation: origin specificity, licensing, and firing at the single-molecule level.Mol. Cell. 2015; 58: 483-494Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar, Mizushima et al., 2000Mizushima T. Takahashi N. Stillman B. Cdc6p modulates the structure and DNA binding activity of the origin recognition complex in vitro.Genes Dev. 2000; 14: 1631-1641PubMed Google Scholar, Speck and Stillman, 2007Speck C. Stillman B. Cdc6 ATPase activity regulates ORC x Cdc6 stability and the selection of specific DNA sequences as origins of DNA replication.J. Biol. Chem. 2007; 282: 11705-11714Crossref PubMed Scopus (70) Google Scholar) and a scaffold for assembling the 12-subunit Mcm2–7 double hexamer (DH) (Evrin et al., 2009Evrin C. Clarke P. Zech J. Lurz R. Sun J. Uhle S. Li H. Stillman B. Speck C. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009; 106: 20240-20245Crossref PubMed Scopus (387) Google Scholar, Remus et al., 2009Remus D. Beuron F. Tolun G. Griffith J.D. Morris E.P. Diffley J.F. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing.Cell. 2009; 139: 719-730Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (474) Google Scholar), known as the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) that licenses replication origins. Melting of origin DNA appears to be carried out during the transition of the inert Mcm2–7 (MCM) DH to form a pair of bidirectional replicative helicases (Li et al., 2015Li N. Zhai Y. Zhang Y. Li W. Yang M. Lei J. Tye B.K. Gao N. Structure of the eukaryotic MCM complex at 3.8 Å.Nature. 2015; 524: 186-191Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar, Martinez et al., 2017Martinez M.P. Wacker A.L. Bruck I. Kaplan D.L. Eukaryotic replicative helicase subunit interaction with DNA and its role in DNA replication.Genes (Basel). 2017; 8: E117Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar, Parker et al., 2017Parker M.W. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. Mechanisms and regulation of DNA replication initiation in eukaryotes.Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017; 52: 107-144Crossref PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar). The biochemistry and genetics on this subject accumulated throughout the years suggest that this process is much more complicated in eukaryotes, and they have been summarized periodically by in-depth reviews (Bell and Labib, 2016Bell S.P. Labib K. Chromosome duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Genetics. 2016; 203: 1027-1067Crossref PubMed Scopus (211) Google Scholar, Costa et al., 2013Costa A. Hood I.V. Berger J.M. Mechanisms for initiating cellular DNA replication.Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013; 82: 25-54Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar, Deegan and Diffley, 2016Deegan T.D. Diffley J.F. MCM: one ring to rule them all.Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2016; 37: 145-151Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar, Samson and Bell, 2013Samson R.Y. Bell S.D. MCM loading—an open-and-shut case?.Mol. Cell. 2013; 50: 457-458Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar). Putting these disjointed pieces of information together without a structural framework has been difficult. Extrapolating from the simpler models of archaea, which have homologs of Orc1/Cdc6 and Mcm, has been useful (Chong et al., 2000Chong J.P. Hayashi M.K. Simon M.N. Xu R.M. Stillman B. A double-hexamer archaeal minichromosome maintenance protein is an ATP-dependent DNA helicase.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000; 97: 1530-1535Crossref PubMed Scopus (260) Google Scholar, Samson and Bell, 2016Samson R.Y. Bell S.D. Chapter Five: archaeal DNA replication origins and recruitment of the MCM replicative helicase.in: Laurie S.K. Marcos Túlio O. The Enzymes. Academic Press, 2016: 169-190Google Scholar, Slaymaker and Chen, 2012Slaymaker I.M. Chen X.S. MCM structure and mechanics: what we have learned from archaeal MCM.in: MacNeill S. The Eukaryotic Replisome: a Guide to Protein Structure and Function. Springer Netherlands, 2012: 89-111Crossref Scopus (28) Google Scholar), especially with the early crystal structures of portions of these proteins (Fletcher et al., 2003Fletcher R.J. Bishop B.E. Leon R.P. Sclafani R.A. Ogata C.M. Chen X.S. The structure and function of MCM from archaeal M. thermoautotrophicum.Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003; 10: 160-167Crossref PubMed Scopus (264) Google Scholar, Miller and Enemark, 2015Miller J.M. Enemark E.J. Archaeal MCM proteins as an analog for the eukaryotic Mcm2-7 helicase to reveal essential features of structure and function.Archaea. 2015; 2015: 305497Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar). However, the simplified model exactly lacks the intricacies of eukaryotes that have puzzled researchers. High-resolution structures of the eukaryote replication machinery are key to assembling this elaborate puzzle. Until only very recently, sub-nanometer high-resolution structures of the critical components of the DNA replication initiation molecular assembly were rare (Table 1). With the advent of the resolution revolution of cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM), a few of these critical structures became available. In particular, the Mcm2–7 single hexamer (MCM-SH) (7.3 Å) (Zhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar), the Cdt1-Mcm2–7 (CM) heptamer (7.1 Å) (Zhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar), the ORC-Cdc6-Cdt1-Mcm2–7 (OCCM) intermediate (3.9 Å) (Yuan et al., 2017Yuan Z. Riera A. Bai L. Sun J. Nandi S. Spanos C. Chen Z.A. Barbon M. Rappsilber J. Stillman B. et al.Structural basis of Mcm2-7 replicative helicase loading by ORC-Cdc6 and Cdt1.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 316-324Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar), and the Mcm2–7 double hexamer (MCM-DH) (3.8 Å) (Li et al., 2015Li N. Zhai Y. Zhang Y. Li W. Yang M. Lei J. Tye B.K. Gao N. Structure of the eukaryotic MCM complex at 3.8 Å.Nature. 2015; 524: 186-191Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar) provide a series of snapshots that show a glimpse of the sequence of events that leads to replication licensing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This exciting development provides the much-needed structural framework to organize the wealth of genetic and biochemical details that researchers have accumulated. In this review, we try to integrate the many seemingly disjointed pieces of biochemical and genetic information into these snapshots to produce two animated sequels of the assembly process of the MCM-DH. Throughout this exercise, we point out the missing links and speculative hypotheses used to fill the gaps, hopeful and mindful that a fuller and more accurate picture will be forthcoming.Table 1Structures Related to DNA Replication LicensingReplication ComplexSourceSize (MDa)Resolution (Å)MethodEMD or PDB (Special Feature)ReferenceOrigin recognition complexOrc1-5yeast0.3625NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 5013Chen et al., 2008Chen Z. Speck C. Wendel P. Tang C. Stillman B. Li H. The architecture of the DNA replication origin recognition complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008; 105: 10326-10331Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google ScholarOrc1-6fly0.3922NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 2479Bleichert et al., 2013Bleichert F. Balasov M. Chesnokov I. Nogales E. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. A Meier-Gorlin syndrome mutation in a conserved C-terminal helix of Orc6 impedes origin recognition complex formation.eLife. 2013; 2: e00882Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholartrimmed Orc1-6fly0.283.5X-ray diffractionPDB: 4xgcBleichert et al., 2015Bleichert F. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic origin recognition complex.Nature. 2015; 519: 321-326Crossref PubMed Scopus (97) Google Scholartrimmed Orc1-5human0.2818cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 8541; PDB: 5ujmTocilj et al., 2017Tocilj A. On K.F. Yuan Z. Sun J. Elkayam E. Li H. Stillman B. Joshua-Tor L. Structure of the active form of human origin recognition complex and its ATPase motor module.eLife. 2017; 6: e20818Crossref PubMed Google Scholartrimmed Orc1/4/5human0.163.39X-ray diffractionPDB: 5uj7Tocilj et al., 2017Tocilj A. On K.F. Yuan Z. Sun J. Elkayam E. Li H. Stillman B. Joshua-Tor L. Structure of the active form of human origin recognition complex and its ATPase motor module.eLife. 2017; 6: e20818Crossref PubMed Google Scholartrimmed Orc2/3human0.126X-ray diffractionPDB: 5uj8Tocilj et al., 2017Tocilj A. On K.F. Yuan Z. Sun J. Elkayam E. Li H. Stillman B. Joshua-Tor L. Structure of the active form of human origin recognition complex and its ATPase motor module.eLife. 2017; 6: e20818Crossref PubMed Google ScholarORC-Cdc6-DNAyeast0.515cryo-EM (200 kV)EMD: 5381Sun et al., 2012Sun J. Kawakami H. Zech J. Speck C. Stillman B. Li H. Cdc6-induced conformational changes in ORC bound to origin DNA revealed by cryo-electron microscopy.Structure. 2012; 20: 534-544Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (59) Google ScholarMcm2–7fly0.5433NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 1834Costa et al., 2011Costa A. Ilves I. Tamberg N. Petojevic T. Nogales E. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011; 18: 471-477Crossref PubMed Scopus (257) Google Scholarfly0.5435NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 1835Costa et al., 2011Costa A. Ilves I. Tamberg N. Petojevic T. Nogales E. Botchan M.R. Berger J.M. The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011; 18: 471-477Crossref PubMed Scopus (257) Google Scholarhuman0.56723NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 2872Hesketh et al., 2015Hesketh E.L. Parker-Manuel R.P. Chaban Y. Satti R. Coverley D. Orlova E.V. Chong J.P. DNA induces conformational changes in a recombinant human minichromosome maintenance complex.J. Biol. Chem. 2015; 290: 7973-7979Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholarhuman0.56723NS-EM (120 kV)EMD: 2873 (DNA bound)Hesketh et al., 2015Hesketh E.L. Parker-Manuel R.P. Chaban Y. Satti R. Coverley D. Orlova E.V. Chong J.P. DNA induces conformational changes in a recombinant human minichromosome maintenance complex.J. Biol. Chem. 2015; 290: 7973-7979Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholaryeast0.6068cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 6673 (AMPPNP bound)Zhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholaryeast0.6067.3cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 6674 (ADP bound)Zhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google ScholarCdt1-Mcm2–7yeast0.6757.1cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 6671 (AMPPNP bound); PDB: 5h7iZhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholaryeast0.6757.1cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 6672 (ADP bound)Zhai et al., 2017Zhai Y. Cheng E. Wu H. Li N. Yung P.Y. Gao N. Tye B.K. Open-ringed structure of the Cdt1-Mcm2-7 complex as a precursor of the MCM double hexamer.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 300-308Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google ScholarORC-Cdc6-Cdt1-Mcm2–7 (OCCM)yeast1.114cryo-EM (200 kV)EMD: 5625Sun et al., 2013Sun J. Evrin C. Samel S.A. Fernández-Cid A. Riera A. Kawakami H. Stillman B. Speck C. Li H. Cryo-EM structure of a helicase loading intermediate containing ORC-Cdc6-Cdt1-MCM2-7 bound to DNA.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013; 20: 944-951Crossref PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholaryeast1.13.9cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 8540; PDB: 5udbYuan et al., 2017Yuan Z. Riera A. Bai L. Sun J. Nandi S. Spanos C. Chen Z.A. Barbon M. Rappsilber J. Stillman B. et al.Structural basis of Mcm2-7 replicative helicase loading by ORC-Cdc6 and Cdt1.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 316-324Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google ScholarMcm2–7 double hexameryeast1.230NS-EM (120 kV)data not depositedRemus et al., 2009Remus D. Beuron F. Tolun G. Griffith J.D. Morris E.P. Diffley J.F. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing.Cell. 2009; 139: 719-730Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (474) Google Scholaryeast1.215cryo-EM (200 kV)EMD: 5857Sun et al., 2014Sun J. Fernandez-Cid A. Riera A. Tognetti S. Yuan Z. Stillman B. Speck C. Li H. Structural and mechanistic insights into Mcm2-7 double-hexamer assembly and function.Genes Dev. 2014; 28: 2291-2303Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholaryeast1.23.8cryo-EM (300 kV)EMD: 6338; PDB: 3ja8Li et al., 2015Li N. Zhai Y. Zhang Y. Li W. Yang M. Lei J. Tye B.K. Gao N. Structure of the eukaryotic MCM complex at 3.8 Å.Nature. 2015; 524: 186-191Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar Open table in a new tab The MCM mutants were named after the minichromosome maintenance screen designed to identify replication initiation mutants in yeast (Gibson et al., 1990Gibson S.I. Surosky R.T. Tye B.K. The phenotype of the minichromosome maintenance mutant mcm3 is characteristic of mutants defective in DNA replication.Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990; 10: 5707-5720Crossref PubMed Scopus (112) Google Scholar, Maine et al., 1984Maine G.T. Sinha P. Tye B.K. Mutants of S. cerevisiae defective in the maintenance of minichromosomes.Genetics. 1984; 106: 365-385Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Although multiple homologs of the MCM proteins or mutants were identified in different organisms often based on phenotypes unrelated to DNA replication functions (Holthoff et al., 1996Holthoff H.P. Hameister H. Knippers R. A novel human Mcm protein: homology to the yeast replication protein Mis5 and chromosomal location.Genomics. 1996; 37: 131-134Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar, Kubota et al., 1997Kubota Y. Mimura S. Nishimoto S. Masuda T. Nojima H. Takisawa H. Licensing of DNA replication by a multi-protein complex of MCM/P1 proteins in Xenopus eggs.EMBO J. 1997; 16: 3320-3331Crossref PubMed Scopus (94) Google Scholar, Moir et al., 1982Moir D. Stewart S.E. Osmond B.C. Botstein D. Cold-sensitive cell-division-cycle mutants of yeast: isolation, properties, and pseudoreversion studies.Genetics. 1982; 100: 547-563Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), only six of them were ubiquitous to all eukaryotes from yeast to human. They were named Mcm2, Mcm3, Mcm4, Mcm5, Mcm6, and Mcm7. Despite their similarity, early yeast studies showed that each was indispensable for growth (Yan et al., 1991Yan H. Gibson S. Tye B.K. Mcm2 and Mcm3, two proteins important for ARS activity, are related in structure and function.Genes Dev. 1991; 5: 944-957Crossref PubMed Scopus (153) Google Scholar) and for DNA replication (Labib et al., 2000Labib K. Tercero J.A. Diffley J.F. Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression.Science. 2000; 288: 1643-1647Crossref PubMed Scopus (523) Google Scholar). Since a single homolog identified in the archaea can form a hexameric ring helicase, an immediate curiosity was why eukaryotes need six homologous subunits to form a heterohexameric ring helicase. A sequence and structural comparison of the six eukaryotic MCM homologs with the archaeal homolog shows that the core that defines the structural NTD (N-terminal domain) and CTD (C-terminal domain) as well as the catalytic function of the MCM helicase is highly conserved (Figure 1A; Figure S1). Both the archaeal and the eukaryotic MCMs also contain CTEs (C-terminal extensions) (magenta), but these domains appear to be highly divergent both in sequence and in length (Figure 1A; Figure S1). Features absent from the archaeal MCM are the NTEs (N-terminal extensions) (lime green), NTIs (N-terminal insertions), N-C linker insertions, and CTIs (C-terminal insertions) (red) (Figure 1A). All of these elements are unique in sequence among members of the MCM family but mostly conserved with some exceptions among individual homologs across species (Figure S1), suggesting that they play conserved and specific roles. Four MCM-related cryo-EM structures, Mcm2–7, CM, OCCM, and the DH that became available recently provide a trove of information of how the MCM-DH is assembled by ORC-Cdc6. In particular, since Cdt1-MCM is the precursor of OCCM and OCCM is the precursor of MCM-DH, these structures inform how the unique elements of each of the MCMs behave during the assembly process. Figure 2 illustrates the precursor-product relationship of these transitional structures in different views, starting from top to bottom. If we first focus on the CTEs, in the CM heptamer (Figures 1B and 2E–2H), which is a left-handed open coil with a narrow gate of 10–15 Å, only the CTEs of Mcm2, Mcm4, Mcm5, and Mcm6 are structured (Figure 1B, in magenta). The Mcm5-CTE deposits its wing helix domain (WHD) in the central channel (Figures 2A, 2B, 2E, 2F, and 3E–3G ), while the CTEs of Mcm4 and Mcm6 form a pseudo-dimer above the core of the coil (Figures 2B, 2D, 2F, and 2H). The narrow gate and the spatial arrangement of the CTEs of Mcm4 and Mcm5 largely block the entry of duplex DNA into the MCM coil (Figures 2E, 2F, and 3E–3G). Consistent with these structural features, biochemical studies show that the CM heptamer cannot be loaded onto double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) spontaneously (Bochman and Schwacha, 2007Bochman M.L. Schwacha A. Differences in the single-stranded DNA binding activities of MCM2-7 and MCM467: MCM2 and MCM5 define a slow ATP-dependent step.J. Biol. Chem. 2007; 282: 33795-33804Crossref PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar, Bowers et al., 2004Bowers J.L. Randell J.C. Chen S. Bell S.P. ATP hydrolysis by ORC catalyzes reiterative Mcm2-7 assembly at a defined origin of replication.Mol. Cell. 2004; 16: 967-978Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (195) Google Scholar, Coster et al., 2014Coster G. Frigola J. Beuron F. Morris E.P. Diffley J.F. Origin licensing requires ATP binding and hydrolysis by the MCM replicative helicase.Mol. Cell. 2014; 55: 666-677Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar, Evrin et al., 2009Evrin C. Clarke P. Zech J. Lurz R. Sun J. Uhle S. Li H. Stillman B. Speck C. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009; 106: 20240-20245Crossref PubMed Scopus (387) Google Scholar, Frigola et al., 2013Frigola J. Remus D. Mehanna A. Diffley J.F. ATPase-dependent quality control of DNA replication origin licensing.Nature. 2013; 495: 339-343Crossref PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar, Heller et al., 2011Heller R.C. Kang S. Lam W.M. Chen S. Chan C.S. Bell S.P. Eukaryotic origin-dependent DNA replication in vitro reveals sequential action of DDK and S-CDK kinases.Cell. 2011; 146: 80-91Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (232) Google Scholar, Kang et al., 2014Kang S. Warner M.D. Bell S.P. Multiple functions for Mcm2-7 ATPase motifs during replication initiation.Mol. Cell. 2014; 55: 655-665Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar, Remus et al., 2009Remus D. Beuron F. Tolun G. Griffith J.D. Morris E.P. Diffley J.F. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing.Cell. 2009; 139: 719-730Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (474) Google Scholar).Figure 3Rearrangements of the MCM CTEs during MCM LoadingShow full caption(A and B) Front and back views of the OCCM structure (PDB: 5udb). Highlighted in colors are CTEs in (A) and the gate-forming subunits Mcm2 and Mcm5 in (B).(C) Contact surfaces created by ORC and Cdc6 for WHDs of M3 and M7.(D) Cdc6 and DNA contact points in OC.(E–G) Steric hindrance for MCM loading imposed by the CTEs from Mcm4, Mcm5, and Mcm6 of the Cdt1-MCM heptamer (PDB: 5h7i). The structures of the Cdt1-MCM and the OCCM were superimposed by aligning the Mcm2-CTD. (E) Side view shows the superimposed structures of OC-DNA (in gray) derived from OCCM and the cWHDs (color coded) from Cdt1-MCM heptamer. (F) Top view shows the aligned structures in (E). Outline traces the contour of OC. During the transition from Cdt1-Mcm to OCCM, the cWHDs of Mcm4, 5, and 6 undergo translocation as indicated by arrows, while the CTEs of Mcm3 and 7 form structured cWHD. (G) The putative pathway of Mcm5-cWHD translocation in transitioning from Cdt1-MCM to OCCM is shown. The lower position indicates the initial location of Mcm5-WHD in the Cdt1-MCM using Mcm2-CTD as reference for alignment with OCCM; the upper position is its intermediate location using Mcm5-CTD as reference for alignment. Further translation of the Mcm5-WHD is suggested as the arrow-headed direction.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) (A and B) Front and back views of the OCCM structure (PDB: 5udb). Highlighted in colors are CTEs in (A) and the gate-forming subunits Mcm2 and Mcm5 in (B). (C) Contact surfaces created by ORC and Cdc6 for WHDs of M3 and M7. (D) Cdc6 and DNA contact points in OC. (E–G) Steric hindrance for MCM loading imposed by the CTEs from Mcm4, Mcm5, and Mcm6 of the Cdt1-MCM heptamer (PDB: 5h7i). The structures of the Cdt1-MCM and the OCCM were superimposed by aligning the Mcm2-CTD. (E) Side view shows the superimposed structures of OC-DNA (in gray) derived from OCCM and the cWHDs (color coded) from Cdt1-MCM heptamer. (F) Top view shows the aligned structures in (E). Outline traces the contour of OC. During the transition from Cdt1-Mcm to OCCM, the cWHDs of Mcm4, 5, and 6 undergo translocation as indicated by arrows, while the CTEs of Mcm3 and 7 form structured cWHD. (G) The putative pathway of Mcm5-cWHD translocation in transitioning from Cdt1-MCM to OCCM is shown. The lower position indicates the initial location of Mcm5-WHD in the Cdt1-MCM using Mcm2-CTD as reference for alignment with OCCM; the upper position is its intermediate location using Mcm5-CTD as reference for alignment. Further translation of the Mcm5-WHD is suggested as the arrow-headed direction. In the OCCM, the previously non-discernible Mcm3-CTE becomes visible as a wing helix at the very end, extending well above the MCM CTD ring through a long flexible linker to lodge its C-terminal wing helix domain (cWHD) onto the surface created by Cdc6-Orc2 (Figures 1B, 1C, 2A–2L, 3A, and 3C). The role of Mcm3-cWHD in the docking of the MCM onto ORC-Cdc6 has been well documented (Frigola et al., 2013Frigola J. Remus D. Mehanna A. Diffley J.F. ATPase-dependent quality control of DNA replication origin licensing.Nature. 2013; 495: 339-343Crossref PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar). Previous study showed that truncation and mutations of the cWHD of Mcm3 block the loading of MCM onto ORC-Cdc6, precluding any interaction between ORC-Cdc6 (OC) and MCM. This result suggests that Mcm3-cWHD makes the first necessary contact between OC and MCM. Moreover, the Mcm3-CTE fragment alone can bind OC and activate its ATPase (Fernández-Cid et al., 2013Fernández-Cid A. Riera A. Tognetti S. Herrera M.C. Samel S. Evrin C. Winkler C. Gardenal E. Uhle S. Speck C. An ORC/Cdc6/MCM2-7 complex is formed in a multistep reaction to serve as a platform for MCM double-hexamer assembly.Mol. Cell. 2013; 50: 577-588Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar, Frigola et al., 2013Frigola J. Remus D. Mehanna A. Diffley J.F. ATPase-dependent quality control of DNA replication origin licensing.Nature. 2013; 495: 339-343Crossref PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar), which presumably triggers a series of allosteric conformational changes of the OC to engage with other MCM subunits. It is noteworthy that OCCM can be formed in the presence of ATP-γ-S, suggesting that, up to this point, assembly of this intermediate complex is largely independent of ATP hydrolysis by OC or Mcm2–7 (Fernández-Cid et al., 2013Fernández-Cid A. Riera A. Tognetti S. Herrera M.C. Samel S. Evrin C. Winkler C. Gardenal E. Uhle S. Speck C. An ORC/Cdc6/MCM2-7 complex is formed in a multistep reaction to serve as a platform for MCM double-hexamer assembly.Mol. Cell. 2013; 50: 577-588Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar, Frigola et al., 2013Frigola J. Remus D. Mehanna A. Diffley J.F. ATPase-dependent quality control of DNA replication origin licensing.Nature. 2013; 495: 339-343Crossref PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar, Sun et al., 2013Sun J. Evrin C. Samel S.A. Fernández-Cid A. Riera A. Kawakami H. Stillman B. Speck C. Li H. Cryo-EM structure of a helicase loading intermediate containing ORC-Cdc6-Cdt1-MCM2-7 bound to DNA.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013; 20: 944-951Crossref PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholar, Yuan et al., 2017Yuan Z. Riera A. Bai L. Sun J. Nandi S. Spanos C. Chen Z.A. Barbon M. Rappsilber J. Stillman B. et al.Structural basis of Mcm2-7 replicative helicase loading by ORC-Cdc6 and Cdt1.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017; 24: 316-324Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar). Subsequent anchoring of the MCM to OC facilitated by the rearrangements of the cWHDs of other MCM subunits is evident by the structural comparison between CM and OCCM (Figures 3A, 3E, and 3F). The previously non-discernible Mcm7-CTE (Figures 1B, 2D, and 2H) is also visible as a structured WHD (Figures 1C, 2K, and 2L), and it binds to the surf
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Structure of Eukaryotic CMG Helicase at a Replication Fork and Implications for Replisome Architecture and Origin Initiation
Zuanning Yuan,Roxana Georgescu,Bai Lin,Ruda Luna Almeida Santos,Dan Zhang,Olga Yurieva,Michael O'Donnell,Huilin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.646.7
2018-04-01
The FASEB Journal
Abstract:Helicases are a class of motor proteins that move directionally along a nucleic acid phosphodiester backbone and separate two annealed nucleic acid strands by using ATP hydrolysis. Helicases exist in all living organisms. Based on their shared sequence motifs, they are classified into 6 classes in which superfamilies 1 and 2 are not ring‐shaped structure and superfamilies 3–6 are ring‐forming helicases. In eukaryotes, DNA helicase CMG consists of the Mcm2–7 hexameric ring along with five accessory factors. The Mcm2–7 heterohexamer, like all hexameric helicases, is shaped like a ring with two tiers referred to as an NTD tier (N‐terminal domain) and a CTD tier (C‐terminal domain); the CTD tier contains the ATP motors. In principle, either tier could translocate ahead of the other during movement on DNA. By using single‐particle cryo‐EM of an active CMG on the forked DNA with a dual biotin‐streptavidin block, we solved the first structure of helicase in complex with a DNA fork. The DNA duplex stem penetrates into the central channel of the NTD tier and the unwound leading ssDNA traverses the channel through the NTD tier into the CTD motor tier, 5′‐3′ through CMG. Therefore, during translocation the CTD motor is behind the NTD ring that is pushed ahead to face the fork, opposite the currently accepted polarity. The polarity of the NTD ahead of the CTD places the leading Polɛ below CMG and Polα‐primase at the top of CMG, above the unwinding point of the replication fork. The DNA direction requires that the Mcm rings must first pass one another when the Mcm2–7 double hexamer come apart. Interestingly, the new NTD‐to‐CTD polarity of translocation reveals an unforeseen quality control mechanism that each Mcm2–7 is fully converted from encircling dsDNA to ssDNA before they can depart from the origin. We propose this architecture of two motors head to head may generate energy that underlies initial melting at the origin. Support or Funding Information This work was funded by NIH Grants GM111472 (to H.L.) and GM115809 (to M.E.O.); the Van Andel Research Institute (H.L); and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (M.E.O.). This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology,biology
-
Structural and mechanistic insights into Mcm2–7 double-hexamer assembly and function
Jingchuan Sun,Alejandra Fernandez-Cid,Alberto Riera,Silvia Tognetti,Zuanning Yuan,Bruce Stillman,Christian Speck,Huilin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.242313.114
2014-10-15
Abstract:Eukaryotic cells license each DNA replication origin during G1 phase by assembling a prereplication complex that contains a Mcm2–7 (minichromosome maintenance proteins 2–7) double hexamer. During S phase, each Mcm2–7 hexamer forms the core of a replicative DNA helicase. However, the mechanisms of origin licensing and helicase activation are poorly understood. The helicase loaders ORC–Cdc6 function to recruit a single Cdt1–Mcm2–7 heptamer to replication origins prior to Cdt1 release and ORC–Cdc6–Mcm2–7 complex formation, but how the second Mcm2–7 hexamer is recruited to promote double-hexamer formation is not well understood. Here, structural evidence for intermediates consisting of an ORC–Cdc6–Mcm2–7 complex and an ORC–Cdc6–Mcm2–7–Mcm2–7 complex are reported, which together provide new insights into DNA licensing. Detailed structural analysis of the loaded Mcm2–7 double-hexamer complex demonstrates that the two hexamers are interlocked and misaligned along the DNA axis and lack ATP hydrolysis activity that is essential for DNA helicase activity. Moreover, we show that the head-to-head juxtaposition of the Mcm2–7 double hexamer generates a new protein interaction surface that creates a multisubunit-binding site for an S-phase protein kinase that is known to activate DNA replication. The data suggest how the double hexamer is assembled and how helicase activity is regulated during DNA licensing, with implications for cell cycle control of DNA replication and genome stability.
cell biology,genetics & heredity,developmental biology
-
How MCM loading and spreading specify eukaryotic DNA replication initiation sites
Olivier Hyrien
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9008.1
2016-08-24
F1000Research
Abstract:DNA replication origins strikingly differ between eukaryotic species and cell types. Origins are localized and can be highly efficient in budding yeast, are randomly located in early fly and frog embryos, which do not transcribe their genomes, and are clustered in broad (10-100 kb) non-transcribed zones, frequently abutting transcribed genes, in mammalian cells. Nonetheless, in all cases, origins are established during the G1-phase of the cell cycle by the loading of double hexamers of the Mcm 2-7 proteins (MCM DHs), the core of the replicative helicase. MCM DH activation in S-phase leads to origin unwinding, polymerase recruitment, and initiation of bidirectional DNA synthesis. Although MCM DHs are initially loaded at sites defined by the binding of the origin recognition complex (ORC), they ultimately bind chromatin in much greater numbers than ORC and only a fraction are activated in any one S-phase. Data suggest that the multiplicity and functional redundancy of MCM DHs provide robustness to the replication process and affect replication time and that MCM DHs can slide along the DNA and spread over large distances around the ORC. Recent studies further show that MCM DHs are displaced along the DNA by collision with transcription complexes but remain functional for initiation after displacement. Therefore, eukaryotic DNA replication relies on intrinsically mobile and flexible origins, a strategy fundamentally different from bacteria but conserved from yeast to human. These properties of MCM DHs likely contribute to the establishment of broad, intergenic replication initiation zones in higher eukaryotes.
-
Structural mechanism for replication origin binding and remodeling by a metazoan origin recognition complex and its co-loader Cdc6
Jan Marten Schmidt,Franziska Bleichert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18067-7
IF: 16.6
2020-08-26
Nature Communications
Abstract:Abstract Eukaryotic DNA replication initiation relies on the origin recognition complex (ORC), a DNA-binding ATPase that loads the Mcm2–7 replicative helicase onto replication origins. Here, we report cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of DNA-bound Drosophila ORC with and without the co-loader Cdc6. These structures reveal that Orc1 and Orc4 constitute the primary DNA binding site in the ORC ring and cooperate with the winged-helix domains to stabilize DNA bending. A loop region near the catalytic Walker B motif of Orc1 directly contacts DNA, allosterically coupling DNA binding to ORC’s ATPase site. Correlating structural and biochemical data show that DNA sequence modulates DNA binding and remodeling by ORC, and that DNA bending promotes Mcm2–7 loading in vitro. Together, these findings explain the distinct DNA sequence-dependencies of metazoan and S. cerevisiae initiators in origin recognition and support a model in which DNA geometry and bendability contribute to Mcm2–7 loading site selection in metazoans.
multidisciplinary sciences
-
Multiple pathways for licensing human replication origins
Ran Yang,Olivia Hunker,Marleigh Wise,Franziska Bleichert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.10.588796
2024-04-10
Abstract:The loading of replicative helicases constitutes an obligatory step in the assembly of DNA replication machineries. In eukaryotes, the MCM2-7 replicative helicase motor is deposited onto DNA by the origin recognition complex (ORC) and co-loader proteins as a head-to-head MCM double hexamer to license replication origins. Although extensively studied in the budding yeast model system, the mechanisms of origin licensing in higher eukaryotes remain poorly defined. Here, we use biochemical reconstitution and electron microscopy (EM) to reconstruct the human MCM loading pathway. Unexpectedly, we find that, unlike in yeast, ORC’s Orc6 subunit is not essential for human MCM loading but can enhance loading efficiency. EM analyses identify several intermediates to MCM double hexamer formation in the presence and absence of Orc6, including an abundant DNA-loaded, closed-ring single MCM hexamer intermediate that can mature into a head-to-head double hexamer through different pathways. In an Orc6-facilitated pathway, ORC and a second MCM2-7 hexamer are recruited to the dimerization interface of the first hexamer through an MCM-ORC intermediate that is architecturally distinct from an analogous intermediate in yeast. In an alternative, Orc6-independent pathway, MCM double hexamer formation proceeds through dimerization of two independently loaded single MCM2-7 hexamers, promoted by a propensity of human MCM2-7 hexamers to dimerize without the help of other loading factors. This redundancy in human MCM loading pathways likely provides resilience against replication stress under cellular conditions by ensuring that enough origins are licensed for efficient DNA replication. Additionally, the biochemical reconstitution of human origin licensing paves the way to address many outstanding questions regarding DNA replication initiation and replication-coupled events in higher eukaryotes in the future.
Biochemistry
-
MCM Double Hexamer Loading Visualised with Human Proteins
Florian Weissmann,Julia F. Greiwe,Thomas Pühringer,Thomas C. R. Miller,John F. X. Diffley,Alessandro Costa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.10.588848
2024-04-10
Abstract:Eukaryotic DNA replication begins with the loading of the MCM replicative DNA helicase as a head-to-head double hexamer (DH) at origins of DNA replication . Our current understanding of how DH is assembled by the Origin Recognition Complex (ORC), CDC6 and CDT1 comes mostly from budding yeast. Here we characterise human DH (hDH) loading using biochemical reconstitution and cryo-electron microscopy with purified proteins. We show that hDH engages DNA differently from yeast (yDH), and generates ∼5 base pairs of unwound DNA at the interface between hexamers, as seen in hDH isolated from cells . We identify several differences from yeast in the order of factor recruitment and dependencies during hDH assembly. Unlike yeast , the ORC6 subunit of ORC is not essential for initial MCM recruitment or hDH loading, but contributes to an alternative hDH assembly pathway requiring an intrinsically disordered region (IDR) in ORC1, which may work through a novel MCM-ORC (hMO*) intermediate. Our work presents a detailed view of how DHs are assembled in an organism utilising sequence-independent replication origins, it provides further evidence for diversity in eukaryotic DH assembly mechanisms , and it represents the first step toward reconstitution of DNA replication initiation with purified human proteins.
Biochemistry
-
Structure of the Eukaryotic MCM Complex at 3.8 Å
Ningning Li,Yuanliang Zhai,Yixiao Zhang,Wanqiu Li,Maojun Yang,Jianlin Lei,Bik-Kwoon Tye,Ning Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14685
IF: 64.8
2015-01-01
Nature
Abstract:DNA replication in eukaryotes is strictly regulated by several mechanisms. A central step in this replication is the assembly of the heterohexameric minichromosome maintenance (MCM2-7) helicase complex at replication origins during G1 phase as an inactive double hexamer. Here, using cryo-electron microscopy, we report a near-atomic structure of the MCM2-7 double hexamer purified from yeast G1 chromatin. Our structure shows that two single hexamers, arranged in a tilted and twisted fashion through interdigitated amino-terminal domain interactions, form a kinked central channel. Four constricted rings consisting of conserved interior beta-hairpins from the two single hexamers create a narrow passageway that tightly fits duplex DNA. This narrow passageway, reinforced by the offset of the two single hexamers at the double hexamer interface, is flanked by two pairs of gate-forming subunits, MCM2 and MCM5. These unusual features of the twisted and tilted single hexamers suggest a concerted mechanism for the melting of origin DNA that requires structural deformation of the intervening DNA.
-
Mechanism of replication origin melting nucleated by CMG helicase assembly
Jacob S. Lewis,Marta H. Gross,Joana Sousa,Sarah S. Henrikus,Julia F. Greiwe,Andrea Nans,John F. X. Diffley,Alessandro Costa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04829-4
IF: 64.8
2022-06-16
Nature
Abstract:The activation of eukaryotic origins of replication occurs in temporally separated steps to ensure that chromosomes are copied only once per cell cycle. First, the MCM helicase is loaded onto duplex DNA as an inactive double hexamer. Activation occurs after the recruitment of a set of firing factors that assemble two Cdc45–MCM–GINS (CMG) holo-helicases. CMG formation leads to the underwinding of DNA on the path to the establishment of the replication fork, but whether DNA becomes melted at this stage is unknown 1 . Here we use cryo-electron microscopy to image ATP-dependent CMG assembly on a chromatinized origin, reconstituted in vitro with purified yeast proteins. We find that CMG formation disrupts the double hexamer interface and thereby exposes duplex DNA in between the two CMGs. The two helicases remain tethered, which gives rise to a splayed dimer, with implications for origin activation and replisome integrity. Inside each MCM ring, the double helix becomes untwisted and base pairing is broken. This comes as the result of ATP-triggered conformational changes in MCM that involve DNA stretching and protein-mediated stabilization of three orphan bases. Mcm2 pore-loop residues that engage DNA in our structure are dispensable for double hexamer loading and CMG formation, but are essential to untwist the DNA and promote replication. Our results explain how ATP binding nucleates origin DNA melting by the CMG and maintains replisome stability at initiation.
multidisciplinary sciences
-
DNA translocation mechanism of the MCM complex and implications for replication initiation
Martin Meagher,Leslie B. Epling,Eric J. Enemark
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11074-3
IF: 16.6
2019-07-15
Nature Communications
Abstract:The DNA translocation activity of the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex powers DNA strand separation of the replication forks of eukaryotes and archaea. Here we illustrate an atomic level mechanism for this activity with a crystal structure of an archaeal MCM hexamer bound to single-stranded DNA and nucleotide cofactors. Sequence conservation indicates this rotary mechanism is fully possible for all eukaryotes and archaea. The structure definitively demonstrates the ring orients during translocation with the N-terminal domain leading, indicating that the translocation activity could also provide the physical basis of replication initiation where a double-hexamer idly encircling double-stranded DNA transforms to single-hexamers that encircle only one strand. In this mechanism, each strand binds to the N-terminal tier of one hexamer and the AAA+ tier of the other hexamer such that one ring pulls on the other, aligning equivalent interfaces to enable each hexamer to pull its translocation strand outside of the opposing hexamer.
multidisciplinary sciences
-
Assembly, Activation, and Helicase Actions of MCM2-7: Transition from Inactive MCM2-7 Double Hexamers to Active Replication Forks
Zhiying You,Hisao Masai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080629
2024-08-18
Biology
Abstract:In this review, we summarize the processes of the assembly of multi-protein replisomes at the origins of replication. Replication licensing, the loading of inactive minichromosome maintenance double hexamers (dhMCM2-7) during the G1 phase, is followed by origin firing triggered by two serine–threonine kinases, Cdc7 (DDK) and CDK, leading to the assembly and activation of Cdc45/MCM2-7/GINS (CMG) helicases at the entry into the S phase and the formation of replisomes for bidirectional DNA synthesis. Biochemical and structural analyses of the recruitment of initiation or firing factors to the dhMCM2-7 for the formation of an active helicase and those of origin melting and DNA unwinding support the steric exclusion unwinding model of the CMG helicase.
biology
-
Structure of Eukaryotic CMG Helicase at a Replication Fork and Implications to Replisome Architecture and Origin Initiation
Roxana Georgescu,Zuanning Yuan,Lin Bai,Ruda de Luna Almeida Santos,Jingchuan Sun,Dan Zhang,Olga Yurieva,Huilin Li,Michael E. O'Donnell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620500114
2017-01-01
Abstract:Significance All cellular life forms use a ring-shaped hexameric helicase during DNA replication. CMG (Cdc45, Mcm2–7, GINS) is the eukaryotic replicative helicase. CMG contains the ring-shaped hexameric Mcm2–7 that harbors the helicase motors. CMG is known to bind many other proteins, including a leading and lagging polymerase and primase. Thus, the threading of DNA through the CMG helicase at a replication fork determines the orientation of the associated polymerases at the replication fork, an important structural feature with many consequences that may direct future experimentation. This report uses cryo-EM single-particle reconstruction to image CMG that motored to a block site at a forked junction, enabling direct visualization of DNA threading through CMG.
-
A Double-Hexamer Archaeal Minichromosome Maintenance Protein Is An Atp-Dependent Dna Helicase
J P Chong,M K Hayashi,M N Simon,R M Xu,B Stillman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.030539597
2000-01-01
Abstract:The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins are essential for DNA replication in eukaryotes. Thus far, all eukaryotes have been shown to contain six highly related MCMs that apparently function together in DNA replication. Sequencing of the entire genome of the thermophilic archaeon Methanobacterium thermo-autotrophicum has allowed us to identify only a single MCM-like gene (ORF Mt1770). This gene is most similar to MCM4 in eukaryotic cells. Here we have expressed and purified the M. thermoaototrophicum MCM protein. The purified protein forms a complex that has a molecular mass of approximate to 850 kDa, consistent with formation of a double hexamer, The protein has an ATP-independent DNA-binding activity, a DMA-stimulated ATPase activity that discriminates between single- and double-stranded DNA, and a strand-displacement (helicase) activity that can unwind up to 500 base pairs. The 3' to 5' helicase activity requires both ATP hydrolysis and a functional nucleotide-binding site. Moreover, the double hexamer form is the active helicase, It is therefore likely that an MCM complex acts as the replicative DNA helicase in eukaryotes and archaea, The simplified replication machinery in archaea may provide a simplified model for assembly of the machinery required for initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication.
-
Mechanism of head-to-head MCM double-hexamer formation revealed by cryo-EM
Thomas C. R. Miller,Julia Locke,Julia F. Greiwe,John F. X. Diffley,Alessandro Costa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1768-0
IF: 64.8
2019-11-20
Nature
Abstract:In preparation for bidirectional DNA replication, the origin recognition complex (ORC) loads two hexameric MCM helicases to form a head-to-head double hexamer around DNA<sup><a href="/articles/s41586-019-1768-0#ref-CR1">1</a>,<a href="/articles/s41586-019-1768-0#ref-CR2">2</a></sup>. The mechanism of MCM double-hexamer formation is debated. Single-molecule experiments have suggested a sequential mechanism, in which the ORC-dependent loading of the first hexamer drives the recruitment of the second hexamer<sup><a href="/articles/s41586-019-1768-0#ref-CR3">3</a></sup>. By contrast, biochemical data have shown that two rings are loaded independently via the same ORC-mediated mechanism, at two inverted DNA sites<sup><a href="/articles/s41586-019-1768-0#ref-CR4">4</a>,<a href="/articles/s41586-019-1768-0#ref-CR5">5</a></sup>. Here we visualize MCM loading using time-resolved electron microscopy, and identify intermediates in the formation of the double hexamer. We confirm that both hexamers are recruited via the same interaction that occurs between ORC and the C-terminal domains of the MCM helicases. Moreover, we identify the mechanism of coupled MCM loading. The loading of the first MCM hexamer around DNA creates a distinct interaction site, which promotes the engagement of ORC at the N-terminal homodimerization interface of MCM. In this configuration, ORC is poised to direct the recruitment of the second hexamer in an inverted orientation, which is suitable for the formation of the double hexamer. Our results therefore reconcile the two apparently contrasting models derived from single-molecule experiments and biochemical data.
multidisciplinary sciences
-
Regulation of replication origin licensing by ORC phosphorylation reveals a two-step mechanism for Mcm2-7 ring closing
Audra L. Amasino,Shalini Gupta,Larry J. Friedman,Jeff Gelles,Stephen P. Bell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2221484120
2023-07-11
Abstract:Eukaryotic DNA replication must occur exactly once per cell cycle to maintain cell ploidy. This outcome is ensured by temporally separating replicative helicase loading (G1 phase) and activation (S phase). In budding yeast, helicase loading is prevented outside of G1 by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) phosphorylation of three helicase-loading proteins: Cdc6, the Mcm2-7 helicase, and the origin recognition complex (ORC). CDK inhibition of Cdc6 and Mcm2-7 is well understood. Here we use single-molecule assays for multiple events during origin licensing to determine how CDK phosphorylation of ORC suppresses helicase loading. We find that phosphorylated ORC recruits a first Mcm2-7 to origins but prevents second Mcm2-7 recruitment. The phosphorylation of the Orc6, but not of the Orc2 subunit, increases the fraction of first Mcm2-7 recruitment events that are unsuccessful due to the rapid and simultaneous release of the helicase and its associated Cdt1 helicase-loading protein. Real-time monitoring of first Mcm2-7 ring closing reveals that either Orc2 or Orc6 phosphorylation prevents Mcm2-7 from stably encircling origin DNA. Consequently, we assessed formation of the MO complex, an intermediate that requires the closed-ring form of Mcm2-7. We found that ORC phosphorylation fully inhibits MO complex formation and we provide evidence that this event is required for stable closing of the first Mcm2-7. Our studies show that multiple steps of helicase loading are impacted by ORC phosphorylation and reveal that closing of the first Mcm2-7 ring is a two-step process started by Cdt1 release and completed by MO complex formation.
-
Structural mechanism of helicase loading onto replication origin DNA by ORC-Cdc6
Zuanning Yuan,Sarah Schneider,Thomas Dodd,Alberto Riera,Lin Bai,Chunli Yan,Indiana Magdalou,Ivaylo Ivanov,Bruce Stillman,Huilin Li,Christian Speck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006231117
IF: 11.1
2020-07-15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance The loading of the core Mcm2-7 helicase onto origin DNA is essential for the formation of replication forks and genomic stability. Here, we report two cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures that capture helicase loader–helicase complexes just prior to DNA insertion. These pre-loading structures, combined with a computational simulation of the dynamic transition from the pre-loading state to the loaded state, provide crucial insights into the mechanism required for topologically linking the helicase to DNA. The helicase loading system is highly conserved from yeast to human, which means that the molecular principles described here for the yeast system are likely applicable to the human system.
-
MCM2-7 loading-dependent ORC release ensures genome-wide origin licensing
L. Maximilian Reuter,Sanjay P. Khadayate,Audrey Mossler,Korbinian Liebl,Sarah V. Faull,Mohammad M. Karimi,Christian Speck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51538-9
IF: 16.6
2024-08-24
Nature Communications
Abstract:Abstract Origin recognition complex (ORC)-dependent loading of the replicative helicase MCM2-7 onto replication origins in G1-phase forms the basis of replication fork establishment in S-phase. However, how ORC and MCM2-7 facilitate genome-wide DNA licensing is not fully understood. Mapping the molecular footprints of budding yeast ORC and MCM2-7 genome-wide, we discovered that MCM2-7 loading is associated with ORC release from origins and redistribution to non-origin sites. Our bioinformatic analysis revealed that origins are compact units, where a single MCM2-7 double hexamer blocks repetitive loading through steric ORC binding site occlusion. Analyses of A-elements and an improved B2-element consensus motif uncovered that DNA shape, DNA flexibility, and the correct, face-to-face spacing of the two DNA elements are hallmarks of ORC-binding and efficient helicase loading sites. Thus, our work identified fundamental principles for MCM2-7 helicase loading that explain how origin licensing is realised across the genome.
multidisciplinary sciences
-
Changing protein-DNA interactions promote ORC binding site exchange during replication origin licensing
Annie Zhang,Larry J. Friedman,Jeff Gelles,Stephen P Bell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.16.545300
2023-06-16
Abstract:Abstract During origin licensing, the eukaryotic replicative helicase Mcm2-7 forms head-to-head double hexamers to prime origins for bidirectional replication. Recent single-molecule and structural studies revealed that one molecule of the helicase loader ORC can sequentially load two Mcm2-7 hexamers to ensure proper head-to-head helicase alignment. To perform this task, ORC must release from its initial high-affinity DNA binding site and “flip” to bind a weaker, inverted DNA site. However, the mechanism of this binding-site switch remains unclear. In this study, we used single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (sm-FRET) to study the changing interactions between DNA and ORC or Mcm2-7. We found that the loss of DNA bending that occurs during DNA deposition into the Mcm2-7 central channel increases the rate of ORC dissociation from DNA. Further studies revealed temporally-controlled DNA sliding of helicase-loading intermediates, and that the first sliding complex includes ORC, Mcm2-7, and Cdt1. We demonstrate that sequential events of DNA unbending, Cdc6 release, and sliding lead to a stepwise decrease in ORC stability on DNA, facilitating ORC dissociation from its strong binding site during site switching. In addition, the controlled sliding we observed provides insight into how ORC accesses secondary DNA binding sites at different locations relative to the initial binding site. Our study highlights the importance of dynamic protein-DNA interactions in the loading of two oppositely-oriented Mcm2-7 helicases to ensure bidirectional DNA replication. Significance Statement Bidirectional DNA replication, in which two replication forks travel in opposite directions from each origin of replication, is required for complete genome duplication. To prepare for this event, two copies of the Mcm2-7 replicative helicase are loaded at each origin in opposite orientations. Using single-molecule assays, we studied the sequence of changing protein-DNA interactions involved in this process. These stepwise changes gradually reduce the DNA-binding strength of ORC, the primary DNA binding protein involved in this event. This reduced affinity promotes ORC dissociation and rebinding in the opposite orientation on the DNA, facilitating the sequential assembly of two Mcm2-7 molecules in opposite orientations. Our findings identify a coordinated series of events that drive proper DNA replication initiation.
-
A new class of disordered elements controls DNA replication through initiator self-assembly
Matthew W. Parker,Maren Bell,Mustafa Mir,Jonchee A. Kao,Xavier Darzacq,Michael R. Botchan,James M. Berger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/623058
2019-04-29
Abstract:SUMMARY The initiation of DNA replication in metazoans occurs at thousands of chromosomal sites known as origins. At each origin, the Origin Recognition Complex (ORC), Cdc6, and Cdt1 co-assemble to load the Mcm2-7 replicative helicase onto chromatin. Current replication models envisage a linear arrangement of isolated origins functioning autonomously; the extent of inter-origin organization and communication is unknown. Here, we report that the replication initiation machinery of D. melanogaster unexpectedly undergoes liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) upon binding DNA in vitro . We find that ORC, Cdc6, and Cdt1 contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that drive LLPS and constitute a new class of phase separating elements. Initiator IDRs are shown to regulate multiple functions, including chromosome recruitment, initiator-specific co-assembly, and Mcm2-7 loading. These data help explain how CDK activity controls replication initiation and suggest that replication programs are subject to higher-order levels of inter-origin organization.
-
The structure of ORC–Cdc6 on an origin DNA reveals the mechanism of ORC activation by the replication initiator Cdc6
Xiang Feng,Yasunori Noguchi,Marta Barbon,Bruce Stillman,Christian Speck,Huilin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24199-1
IF: 16.6
2021-06-23
Nature Communications
Abstract:Abstract The Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) binds to sites in chromosomes to specify the location of origins of DNA replication. The S. cerevisiae ORC binds to specific DNA sequences throughout the cell cycle but becomes active only when it binds to the replication initiator Cdc6. It has been unclear at the molecular level how Cdc6 activates ORC, converting it to an active recruiter of the Mcm2-7 hexamer, the core of the replicative helicase. Here we report the cryo-EM structure at 3.3 Å resolution of the yeast ORC–Cdc6 bound to an 85-bp ARS1 origin DNA. The structure reveals that Cdc6 contributes to origin DNA recognition via its winged helix domain (WHD) and its initiator-specific motif. Cdc6 binding rearranges a short α-helix in the Orc1 AAA+ domain and the Orc2 WHD, leading to the activation of the Cdc6 ATPase and the formation of the three sites for the recruitment of Mcm2-7, none of which are present in ORC alone. The results illuminate the molecular mechanism of a critical biochemical step in the licensing of eukaryotic replication origins.
multidisciplinary sciences
-
Structural basis of Mcm2–7 replicative helicase loading by ORC–Cdc6 and Cdt1
Zuanning Yuan,Alberto Riera,Lin Bai,Jingchuan Sun,Saikat Nandi,Christos Spanos,Zhuo Angel Chen,Marta Barbon,Juri Rappsilber,Bruce Stillman,Christian Speck,Huilin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3372
2017-01-01
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Abstract:3.9-Å-resolution cryo-EM structure of the S. cerevisiae OCCM replicative helicase loading complex bound to DNA shows how ORC and Cdc6 recognize DNA origins, and reveals details of how the Mcm2–7 hexamer ring is loaded onto the DNA helix.