Tu1053 ENDOSCOPIC NASO-BILIARY AND PANCREATIC DUCT DRAINAGE (ENBPD) AS A PREVENTION OF DELAYED COMPLICATION AFTER ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR DUODENAL NEOPLASM: A CLINICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY
Seiichiro Fukuhara,Motohiko Kato,Eisuke Iwasaki,Yujiro Machida,Hiroki Tamagawa,Yoichi Takimoto,Tadashi Katayama,Kazuhiro Minami,Shintaro Kawasaki,Takashi Seino,Masayasu Horibe,Yasutoshi Ochiai,Tadateru Maehata,Ai Fujimoto,Osamu Goto,Kayoko Kimura,Kaoru Takabayashi,Naoki Hosoe,Takanori Kanai,Naohisa Yahagi,Haruhiko Ogata
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2113
IF: 10.396
2018-01-01
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Abstract:Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is getting to be applied for large superficial duodenal neoplasm, considering invasiveness of pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple’s procedure). However, it has been reported to be associated with high risk of delayed complications such as perforation and bleeding due to exposure of bile and pancreatic juice especially in lesions locating distal duodenum (Inoue et al. Dig. Endosc. 2014). Endoscopic closure of mucosal defect would reduce delayed complications (Hoteya et al. Digetsion 2017), however, it is difficult or sometimes impossible to close the mucosal defect completely depending on the location and size of the lesion. We try to perform endoscopic naso-biliary and pancreatic duct drainage (ENBPD) immediately after ESD in such cases. ENBPD could reduce delayed complications, but it is unknown of the feasibility to insert side-viewing endoscope and drainage tube in cases with large duodenal mucosal defect. The aim of this study was to assess safety and feasibility of endoscopic drainage of bile and pancreatic duct. This was a retrospective observational study from a university hospital. We analyzed 156 cases with duodenal ESD (9 cases with ENBPD and 147 cases without) from June 2010 until June 2017. Patients’ backgrounds, success rate of the procedure, complications caused by ENBPD (including post-ERCP pancreatitis [PEP]), and incidence of delayed complication (defined as perforation or bleeding found after the end of procedure), was analyzed and compared between patients with and without ENBPD. Post ESD mucosal defect was completely closed 115 cases (73.7%) without ENBPD, whereas complete closure was not achieved in any cases with ENBPD. Mean lesion size was significantly larger in cases with ENBPD (50.0 ± 14.5mm vs 26.1 ± 14.7mm, p <0.001). ENBPD procedure succeeded in all 9 cases without any complications caused by ENBPD procedure itself. Delayed complication occurred in 13 cases (8.3%), including 8 cases of bleeding (5.1%) and 3 cases of perforation (1.9%). Although the cases with ERCP procedure was mostly difficult to perform endoscopic closure for resected lesion, there was no significant difference of delayed complications between with and without ENBPD. Endoscopic drainage of bile and pancreatic duct was safe and technically feasible. The fact there was no difference of incidence of delayed complication, although mucosal defect was significantly larger and left unclosed in ENBPD cases, suggests potential effectiveness of ENBPD.