Abstract:Background Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is the most frequently used technique for removal of stones from the bile duct. In recent years, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) has been shown to be a safe and effective technique for the removal of large or difficult common bile duct stones. However, comparison of EPLBD and EST for effectiveness in bile duct stone removal has given inconsistent results. The present meta-analysis was carried out to compare the effect of EPLBD and EST in retrieval of choledocholithiasis. Methods A literature search was performed using Medline, PubMed, EMBase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant articles published in English. A meta-analysis was performed on the retrieved studies. Results Seven randomized controlled trials and 790 patients were involved. EPLBD compared with EST resulted in similar outcomes for overall successful clearance rates of bile duct stones (97.35 vs. 96.35%, OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.58–2.82, P = 0.54), stone clearance in the first ERCP session (87.87 vs. 84.15%, OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.81–2.11, P = 0.21) and removal of large sized stones (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.21–5.64, P = 0.49). EPLBD performed with either a short or a long ballooning time did not increase the bile duct stone clearance rate. EPLBD decreased overall usage of mechanical lithotripsy in the bile duct stone removal process (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30–0.86, P = 0.01). However, no significant difference was found between EPLBD and EST in the use of mechanical lithotripsy for the removal of large sized stones (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.34–1.28, P = 0.22). Compared with EST, EPLBD did not show a short ERCP duration (WMD −0.75, 95% CI −1.57 to 0.08, P = 0.08). EPLBD was associated with fewer overall complications than EST (5.8 vs. 13.1%, OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24–0.68, P = 0.0007). Hemorrhage occurred less frequently with EPLBD than with EST (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04–0.50, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in post-ERCP pancreatitis, perforation and cholangitis. Conclusions EPLBD is an effective and safe method for the removal of large or difficult common bile stones. EPLBD should be considered as an alternative to EST for patients in whom EST could not be routinely performed. Based on EPLBD causing fewer cases of hemorrhaging, EPLBD is also recommended for removal of large or difficult common bile duct stones in patients with an underlying coagulopathy or need for anticoagulation following ERCP. The long-term prognosis of EPLBD need to be further investigated.

Efficacy of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis and cholangitis after repeated clearance of common bile duct stones: experience from a Chinese center

A retrospective comparison of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) and endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) in the treatment of acute cholangitis

Nasobiliary drainage can reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis after papillary large balloon dilation plus endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a randomized controlled trial

Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Prevention of Pancreatitis After Papillary Balloon Dilatation by Nasobiliary Drainage: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Is safe and efficient by intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage over primary closure of the common bile duct for cholecystolithiasis combined with common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis

The safety of not implementing endoscopic nasobiliary drainage after elective clearance of choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Retention Time of Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage and Symptomatic Choledocholithiasis Recurrence After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Single-center, Retrospective Study in Fuyang, China

Combined Gastroscopic and Choledochoscopic Transabdominal Nasobiliary Drainage

CLINICAL VALUES OF NOSE-BILE DRAINAGE IN ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY

Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective study of efficacy and risk factors related to complications

A single-center retrospective study comparing safety and efficacy of endoscopic biliary stenting only vs. EBS plus nasobiliary drain for obstructive jaundice

IS NASOBILIARY DRAINAGE UNNECESSARY FOR DRAINAGE OF ACUTE SUPPURATIVE CHOLANGITIS? OUR EXPERIENCE

The assessment of postoperative cholangitis in malignant biliary obstruction: a real-world study of nasobiliary drainage after endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stent

The nursing of biliary and pancreatic diseases treated by endoscopic nosal biliany drainage

The Safety and Efficacy of Primary Duct Closure without Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration

Application of endoscopic sphincterotomy in acute pancreatitis with fluid collection: A prospective study

Treatment of Postcholecystectomy Bile Leakage by Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage

Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure and intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis

Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The effects of different preoperative biliary drainage methods on complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy