Abstract:The presence, magnitude, and significance of sex differences in the human brain are hotly debated topics in the scientific community and popular media. This debate is largely fueled by studies containing strong, opposing conclusions: either little to no evidence exists for sex differences in human neuroanatomy, or there are small-to-moderate differences in the size of certain brain regions that are highly reproducible across cohorts (even after controlling for sex differences in average brain size). Our Commentary uses the specific comparison between two recent large-scale studies that adopt these opposing views—namely the review by Eliot and colleagues (2021) and the direct analysis of ~ 40k brains by Williams and colleagues (2021)—in an effort to clarify this controversy and provide a framework for conducting this research. First, we review observations that motivate research on sex differences in human neuroanatomy, including potential causes (evolutionary, genetic, and environmental) and effects (epidemiological and clinical evidence for sex-biased brain disorders). We also summarize methodological and empirical support for using structural MRI to investigate such patterns. Next, we outline how researchers focused on sex differences can better specify their study design (e.g., how sex was defined, if and how brain size was adjusted for) and results (by e.g., distinguishing sexual dimorphisms from sex differences). We then compare the different approaches available for studying sex differences across a large number of individuals: direct analysis, meta-analysis, and review. We stress that reviews do not account for methodological differences across studies, and that this variation explains many of the apparent inconsistencies reported throughout recent reviews (including the work by Eliot and colleagues). For instance, we show that amygdala volume is consistently reported as male-biased in studies with sufficient sample sizes and appropriate methods for brain size correction. In fact, comparing the results from multiple large direct analyses highlights small, highly reproducible sex differences in the volume of many brain regions (controlling for brain size). Finally, we describe best practices for the presentation and interpretation of these findings. Care in interpretation is important for all domains of science, but especially so for research on sex differences in the human brain, given the existence of broad societal gender-biases and a history of biological data being used justify sexist ideas. As such, we urge researchers to discuss their results from simultaneously scientific and anti-sexist viewpoints.

Gender on the Brain: A Case Study of Science Communication in the New Media Environment

Researchers' sex/gender identity influences how sex/gender question is investigated in neuroscience: an example from an OHBM meeting

Sex differences in the human brain: a roadmap for more careful analysis and interpretation of a biological reality

Contemporary neuroscience in the media

Problems and Progress regarding Sex Bias and Omission in Neuroscience Research

Considering sex as a biological variable will require a global shift in science culture

Gender Beneath the Skull: Agency, Trauma and Persisting Stereotypes in Neuroepigenetics

Multifaceted origins of sex differences in the brain

Neurofeminism: feminist critiques of research on sex/gender differences in the neurosciences

Remembering the null hypothesis when searching for brain sex differences

Mind the gender gap: The social neuroscience of belonging

Gender (Im)balance in Citation Practices in Cognitive Neuroscience

Sex differences in neurology: a scoping review

The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists

Exploring sex differences: insights into gene expression, neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, cognition, and pathology

Sex and gender in neurodevelopmental conditions

Gender, women and scientific research

Gender Differences in the Human Brain Structure and Function: Evidence from Neuroimaging Studies

Gender(ed) science: How the institutionalization of gender continues to shape the conduct and content of women's health research

At the frontier of epigenetics of brain sex differences

Why sex matters for neuroscience