METHODOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF DIALECTICAL CATEGORIES IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND STUDY OF PROBLEMS OF CIVIL AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE LAW

V.M. SHERSTYUK
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-5-71-85
2021-12-30
Herald of Civil Procedure
Abstract:The article is devoted to the study of the use of some categories of dialectics both in identifying and in studying the problems of civil and arbitral procedure law. Each category allows to reveal its own peculiar features and properties of the branch of law and its structural subdivisions, not only to obtain certain conclusions, but, what is equally important, to put into research its own problems, the answer to which the use of this or that particular category gives. It is noted that each category allows to reveal some one side of the subject of research, but to reveal in depth. In particular, the author argues that a comprehensive disclosure of the essence of civil procedure law is impossible with the use of any one category. Only by covering all or most of them it is possible to fully and comprehensively disclose the essence of the subject of research. At the same time, each method implies the study only of certain problems, conditioned by it. The study of some other problems, “alien” to this method will not give the necessary results. Thus, it is impossible to solve the problems of the system of branch of law with the help of the activity approach.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?