Abstract:We examined the neural mechanisms of simultaneous threat and reward processing under distinct temporal profiles using a semi‐naturalistic experimental paradigm. Our findings revealed a highly distributed system related to threat imminence and a smaller system related to reward imminence, neither of which involved the amygdala, which otherwise largely overlapped with the broader literature (meta‐analyses). Studies of affective neuroscience have typically employed highly controlled, static experimental paradigms to investigate the neural underpinnings of threat and reward processing in the brain. Yet our knowledge of affective processing in more naturalistic settings remains limited. Specifically, affective studies generally examine threat and reward features separately and under brief time periods, despite the fact that in nature organisms are often exposed to the simultaneous presence of threat and reward features for extended periods. To study the neural mechanisms of threat and reward processing under distinct temporal profiles, we created a modified version of the PACMAN game that included these environmental features. We also conducted two automated meta‐analyses to compare the findings from our semi‐naturalistic paradigm to those from more constrained experiments. Overall, our results revealed a distributed system of regions sensitive to threat imminence and a less distributed system related to reward imminence, both of which exhibited overlap yet neither of which involved the amygdala. Additionally, these systems broadly overlapped with corresponding meta‐analyses, with the notable absence of the amygdala in our findings. Together, these findings suggest a shared system for salience processing that reveals a heightened sensitivity toward environmental threats compared to rewards when both are simultaneously present in an environment. The broad correspondence of our findings to meta‐analyses, consisting of more tightly controlled paradigms, illustrates how semi‐naturalistic studies can corroborate previous findings in the literature while also potentially uncovering novel mechanisms resulting from the nuances and contexts that manifest in such dynamic environments.

Counteracting effect of threat on reward enhancements during working memory

Reward Enhances Backward Inhibition in Task Switching

Enhancement of cognitive control by approach and avoidance motivational states

Aversive anticipations modulate electrocortical correlates of decision-making and reward reversal learning, but not behavioral performance

Reward expectation enhances reactive control of distraction by emotionally negative stimuli.

Threat of shock increases distractor susceptibility during the short-term maintenance of visual information.

The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks

Moderate threat causes longer lasting disruption to processing in anxious individuals

Anxiety and Cognitive Performance: A Test of Attentional Control Theory

Need for cognition moderates cognitive effort aversion

Make or break: The influence of expected challenges and rewards on the motivation and experience associated with cognitive effort exertion

Reward Modulates Unconsciously Triggered Adaptive Control Processes

Overlapping Neural Systems Represent Cognitive Effort and Reward Anticipation

Dynamic threat–reward neural processing under semi‐naturalistic ecologically relevant scenarios

The influence of visual working memory representations on attention bias to threat in individuals with high trait anxiety

The role of cognitive effort in subjective reward devaluation and risky decision-making

Controllability modulates the neural response to predictable but not unpredictable threat in humans

Working memory components modulation of attentional disengagement from evaluative distractor

Threat expectation does not improve perceptual discrimination despite causing heightened priority processing in the frontoparietal network

Emotion, working memory task demands and individual differences predict behavior, cognitive effort and negative affect

Threat of resource loss: The role of self-regulation in adaptive task performance.