Increased Time, Administrative Tasks, and Decreasing Reimbursements: Has Value-Based Care Contributed to Burnout Among Orthopaedic Surgeons?
Chad A. Krueger,Samuel Rosas,Dana Jacoby,Marney F. Reid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.09.029
IF: 4.435
2024-09-22
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Abstract:Orthopaedic arthroplasty surgeons are at the center of one of the most expensive surgical treatment strategies for a growing population of patients within the United States. This makes the field of arthroplasty a prime place for cost containment efforts to be directed towards, which has been comprised mostly of strategies labeled as "value-based care (VBC)." With VBC, all healthcare parties involved have aimed to increase value while decreasing costs based on the famous equation by Porter et al.: value = outcome/cost [1]. This has led to many changes over the past years that will be summarized here. Simultaneously, we aim to present how these changes have led to increased surgeon burnout and how they are currently causing changes that will affect patients and surgeons in years to come by imparting changes in practice that do not appear aligned with value outcomes. Moreover, we aim to provide a review of changes that we believe could improve surgeons' satisfaction by increasing their involvement in policy creation and alteration that can lead to sustainable improvement in the field. There were two independent authors who manually searched the literature by exploring PubMed and Google Scholar. Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms involved the use of "burn out, value, arthroplasty, and outcomes." We believe systemic changes that place surgeons in more relevant and policy-making positions are more likely to align with the quadruple aim (i.e., "enhancing patient experience, improving population health, reducing costs, and improving the work life of health care providers") [2]. Orthopaedic surgery is a demanding field characterized by long hours, high patient volume, and complex cases. Numerous studies using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the most studied and validated burnout assessment scale, have documented the large prevalence, showing adverse effects on mental and physical well-being, patient safety, and healthcare quality [3, 4, 5, 6]. The incidence of surgeon burnout has only increased over the years, and there does not appear to be a cure [4, 7]. Furthermore, multiple studies have shown that orthopaedic surgeons have some of the highest rates of suicide among medical specialties [8, 9]. It is also noted that this epidemic of decreased mental health among surgeons is due to a multitude of factors [10]. Some of the most cited include a growing patient population in both size and complexity, reductions in procedural reimbursement, increasing patient demands, and increasing burden of administrative tasks [11, 12]. Other pressures include the shifts from fee-for-service into managed care contracts and VBC programs that require an enormous effort to develop and implement [13, 14]. These VBC programs require surgeons to spend time away from patient care and exponentially increase the volume of administrative tasks directed by healthcare administrators and insurance companies that do not directly engage in patient care - both of which are highly associated with burnout [15]. Furthermore, the pressures that physicians face from health systems to provide high-quality care with fewer resources and autonomy also increase the amount of emotional burden that physicians face [15, 16]. These various stressors are all factors that likely lead to increased burnout and, in some cases, a desire to leave medicine (Figure 1). The initial goal for the implementation of VBC programs was to improve patient outcomes while decreasing overall costs. This was believed to promote more personalized and coordinated care, improve efficiency, and decrease costs by eliminating variability in care [17]. Orthopaedic surgery became impacted by these programs in 2009 with the Acute Care Episode (ACE) project, a pilot of three hospitals implementing bundled payment models for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA)[18]. Around this time, Porter et al. also published their highly cited article defining value as a change in healthcare quality over cost [19]. These VBC models emphasized enhanced patient outcomes, efficiency, and patient satisfaction and successfully reduced the episodic cost of care in certain orthopaedic conditions. These adjustments were accomplished through oversight groups for quality, finance, and provider incentive program committees [20]. Each committee developed and refined cost containment and quality improvement strategies by optimizing and standardizing perioperative patient care and reducing surgical implant costs. The success of the ACE pilots led to other bundled payment programs, such as the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative and the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) [17, 18, 21]. These programs have proven effective and efficient for payers to decrease care costs, yet their effects on the physician have not received much attention. Furthermore, these programs seem to have increased the financial stresses -Abstract Truncated-
orthopedics