Is It Getting More Expensive to Treat Patients Who Have a High Comorbidity Burden? Financial Trends in Total Knee Arthroplasty from 2013 to 2021

Jeremiah Thomas,Itay Ashkenazi,Jonathan Katzman,Armin Arshi,Claudette M. Lajam,Ran Schwarzkopf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.055
IF: 4.435
2024-04-27
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Abstract:Introduction Utilization of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues to rise among patients who have a high comorbidity burden (HCB). With changes in reimbursement models over the past decade, it is essential to assess the financial impact of HCB TKA on health care systems. This study aimed to examine trends in revenue and costs associated with TKA in HCB patients over time. Methods Of 14,978 TKA performed at a large, urban academic medical center between 2013 and 2021, we retrospectively analyzed HCB patients (Charlson comorbidity index [CCI] ≥ 5 and American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA] scores of 3 or 4). A total of 1,156 HCB TKA patients who had complete financial data were identified. Patient demographics, perioperative data, revenue, costs, and contribution margin (CM) were collected for each patient. Changes in these financial values over time, as a percentage of 2013 values, were analyzed. Linear regression was performed with a trend analysis to determine significance. Results From 2013 to 2021, the percentage of HCB TKAs per year increased from 4.2% in 2013 to 16.5% in 2021 ( P <0.001). The revenue of TKA in HCB patients remained steady ( P = 0.093), while direct costs increased significantly (32.0%; P = 0.015), resulting in a decline of CM to a low of 82.3% of 2013 margins. There was no significant change in rates of 90-day complications or home discharge following HCB TKA during the study period. Conclusion The results of this study indicate a major rise in cost for TKA among HCB patients, without a corresponding rise in revenue. As more patients who have HCB become candidates for TKA, the negative financial impact on institutions should be considered, as payments to institutions do not adequately reflect patient complexity. A re-evaluation of institutional payments for medically complex TKA patients is warranted to maintain patient access among at-need populations.
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?