Abstract:Bayesian epistemology has close connections to inductive reasoning, accepting the view that inductive inferences should be analyzed in terms of epistemic probabilities. An important precept of Bayesian epistemology is the dynamics of belief change, with change in belief resulting from updating procedures based on new evidence. The inductive relations between evidence E and hypotheses or theories H are essential, particularly the notions of plausibility, confirmation, and acceptability, which are critical but subject to several difficulties. As a non-deductive process, Bayesian reasoning cannot itself be subjected to strict deductive logic, but it can take advantage of an enabling logical environment. The present paper proposes that paraconsistent and paracomplete logics can be helpful for some questions of Bayesian epistemology, even to the point of being relevant in developing a legitimate paraconsistent Bayesian epistemology . By developing a novel probability theory based on the Logic of Evidence and Truth ( ), a logic that deals with evidence for or against a judgment, including contradictory or missing evidence, we allow for the possibility of quantifying the degree of evidence attributed to a proposition through novel probability measures. We illustrate, through examples, some ways to address challenging problems in the area by using paraconsistent and paracomplete paradigms. This topic is of significant interest not only in the philosophy of science but also in Artificial Intelligence and other emerging trends such as probabilistic networks and related models (see Haenni et al. Probabilistic logics and probabilistic networks, volume 350, Springer, Berlin, 2010)

New theory about old evidence

Conditional Evidence Theory and Its Application in Knowledge Discovery

Where the Truth Lies: A Paraconsistent Approach to Bayesian Epistemology

Learning from conditional probabilities

Evidential Confirmation as Transformed Probability

Bayesian Philosophy of Science

Robust Bayesianism and Likelihoodism

Confirmation bias emerges from an approximation to Bayesian reasoning

Justifying the Norms of Inductive Inference

On Rational Jurisprudence: A Problem in Bayesian Confirmation Theory

Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited

On Universal Prediction and Bayesian Confirmation

Bayesian reasoning in cosmology

Bayesianism and wishful thinking are compatible

Bayesian inference: More than Bayes's theorem

The end of Sleeping Beauty's nightmare

The Bayesian Who Knew Too Much

Bayesian hypothesis tests with diffuse priors: Can we have our cake and eat it too?

Reverse‐Bayes methods for evidence assessment and research synthesis

Conservative Updating

Thomas Bayes's Bayesian Inference