Abstract:Evidential reasoning in expert systems has often used ad-hoc uncertainty calculi. Although it is generally accepted that probability theory provides a firm theoretical foundation, researchers have found some problems with its use as a workable uncertainty calculus. Among these problems are representation of ignorance, consistency of probabilistic judgements, and adjustment of a priori judgements with experience. The application of metaprobability theory to evidential reasoning is a new approach to solving these problems. Metaprobability theory can be viewed as a way to provide soft or hard constraints on beliefs in much the same manner as the Dempster-Shafer theory provides constraints on probability masses on subsets of the state space. Thus, we use the Dempster-Shafer theory, an alternative theory of evidential reasoning to illuminate metaprobability theory as a theory of evidential reasoning. The goal of this paper is to compare how metaprobability theory and Dempster-Shafer theory handle the adjustment of beliefs with evidence with respect to a particular thought experiment. Sections 2 and 3 give brief descriptions of the metaprobability and Dempster-Shafer theories. Metaprobability theory deals with higher order probabilities applied to evidential reasoning. Dempster-Shafer theory is a generalization of probability theory which has evolved from a theory of upper and lower probabilities. Section 4 describes a thought experiment and the metaprobability and DempsterShafer analysis of the experiment. The thought experiment focuses on forming beliefs about a population with 6 types of members {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}. A type is uniquely defined by the values of three features: A, B, C. That is, if the three features of one member of the population were known then its type could be ascertained. Each of the three features has two possible values, (e.g. A can be either "a0" or "al"). Beliefs are formed from evidence accrued from two sensors: sensor A, and sensor B. Each sensor senses the corresponding defining feature. Sensor A reports that half of its observations are "a0" and half the observations are 'al'. Sensor B reports that half of its observations are ``b0,' and half are "bl". Based on these two pieces of evidence, what should be the beliefs on the distribution of types in the population? Note that the third feature is not observed by any sensor.

Conditional Evidence Theory and Its Application in Knowledge Discovery

Conditional Dempster-Shafer Theory for Uncertain Knowledge Updating

Dempster conditioning and conditional independence in evidence theory

Generalized Jeffrey'S Rule of Conditioning and Evidence Combining Rule for A Priori Probabilistic Knowledge in Conditional Evidence Theory

Belief measures conditioned on random set

The generalized combination of evidence involved a priori knowledge

Using Dempster-Shafer Theory Of Evidence For Situation Inference

A Method of Inducing Ordered Basic Belief Assignment and Its Application in Risk Assessment of Tailing Dam

Confidence Factors, Empiricism and the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence

A Comparison of Evidence Fusion Rules for Situation Recognition in Sensor-Based Environments

A new correlation belief function in Dempster-Shafer evidence theory and its application in classification

An improved approach for incomplete information modeling in the evidence theory and its application in classification

Generalization of Dempster-Shafer theory: A complex belief function

Combining belief functions taking into consideration error in judgement

Metaprobability and Dempster-Shafer in Evidential Reasoning

A novel uncertainty modeling method in complex evidence theory for decision making

Error Function Attack of chaos synchronization based encryption schemes

An Improved Belief Entropy in Evidence Theory

D numbers theory: a generalization of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory

Research on dependent evidence combination based on principal component analysis

An Improved Approach for Generation of a Basic Probability Assignment in the Evidence Theory Based on Gaussian Distribution