Abstract:Background: Movement quality assessment is popular within clinical and sporting practice, due to the contribution diminished or suboptimal movement quality is believed to have on musculoskeletal (MSK) injury risk. Various movement quality assessments exist, many are limited to bilateral or jumping movements evaluation. Qualitative analysis of single leg loading (QASLS) is a new clinical assessment tool for unilateral tasks that utilizes a dichotomous scoring system of ten questions relating to the segmental body regions of the trunk, lower and upper limb. Purpose: To determine the intra and inter-rater, within- and between-session reliability of the QASLS tool during two unilateral movement tasks, and provide insight to measurement error and smallest detectable difference (SDD). Study design: Reliability Study. Methods: Fifteen healthy females (mean age 19 years SD2; height 167 cm, +/- 6; weight 56 kg, +/- 6) completed two unilateral tasks, single leg squat (SLS) and single leg landing (SLL), within session data collection occurred on the same day, with between session data collection occurring seven days later. Tasks were scored with the QASLS tool via video playback. Intra-Class correlation coefficients (ICCk,3) were used to measure within and between session reliability, and Kappa coefficients and percentage of exact agreement (PEA%) were used to determine intra and inter-rater reliability. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and the SDD for the compound score of each limb was calculated. Results: Within session reliability of QASLS scores was good (ICC = 0.82-0.86) for SLS and moderate (ICC = 0.67-0.87) for SLL. Between session reliability was moderate (ICC = 0.69-0.87) for SLS and excellent (ICC = 0.92-0.93) for SLL. SEM was less than 1 point, and SDD for compound score ranging from 1.0-2.5 points. Intra-rater agreement of compound QASLS score was near perfect (k = 0.85-100; PEA% 90-100%) and agreement of individual components was substantial- near perfect (k = 0.13-0.74; PEA% 78-100%). Inter-rater agreement for compound QASLS scores ranged from non-substantial (k = 0.13-0.74; PEA% 43.3-90%) for SLS and non-slight (k =0.03-0.17; PEA% 43.3-60%) for SLL. Conclusions: The QASLS movement analysis tool can be used to analyze movement quality during two unilateral loading tasks with moderate to excellent within and between session reliability. PEA% was acceptable for inter-rater agreement, however rater education training is recommended to develop more acceptable levels of reliability. Level of evidence: 3.

Reliability and validity of the Body Awareness Rating Scale (BARS), an observational assessment tool of movement quality

Assessing movement quality in persons with severe mental illness – Reliability and validity of the Body Awareness Scale Movement Quality and Experience

Rasch validation of the revised body awareness rating questionnaire (BARQ-R) in adults with and without musculoskeletal pain

Reliability and concurrent validity of the Active Movement Scale (AMS) in adults with musculoskeletal disorders

Validity and reliability of the Body Awareness Questionnaire in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain

Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure

Validation of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS)

The Barriers to Physical Activity in Type 1 Diabetes (BAPAD-1) scale: predictive validity and reliability

Reliability and validity of the ratings of perceived stability scale as a measure of balance exercise intensity in persons with multiple sclerosis

A behaviourally anchored rating scale for evaluating the use of the WHO surgical safety checklist: development and initial evaluation of the WHOBARS

Validity of the Active Australia Survey in an Australian cardiac rehabilitation population

Toward a Common Language for Measuring Patient Mobility in the Hospital: Reliability and Construct Validity of Interprofessional Mobility Measures

Reliability and Measurement Error of the Qualitative Analysis of Single Leg Loading (QASLS) Tool For Unilateral Tasks

Is the Patient Activation Measure a valid measure of osteoarthritis self-management attitudes and capabilities? Results of a Rasch analysis

Manual ability in hand surgery patients: Validation of the ABILHAND scale in four diagnostic groups

The Overt Behaviour Scale–Self-Report (OBS-SR) for acquired brain injury: exploratory analysis of reliability and validity

Measuring Exercise Self-Efficacy After Stroke: Validity and Reliability of Current Measures

Validity and Reliability of Berg Balance Scale on Assessing Bala Nce Function

Validation of psychosocial scales for physical activity in university students

A pilot rating system to evaluate the quality of goal attainment scales used as outcome measures in rehabilitation

Baby Observational Selective Control AppRaisal (BabyOSCAR): Construct validity and test performance