Abstract:As a schematic model of the complexity economic agents are confronted with, we introduce the "Sherrington-Kirkpatrick game," a discrete time binary choice model inspired from mean-field spin glasses. We show that, even in a completely static environment, agents are unable to learn collectively optimal strategies. This is either because the learning process gets trapped in a suboptimal fixed point or because learning never converges and leads to a never-ending evolution of agent intentions. Contrarily to the hope that learning might save the standard "rational expectation" framework in economics, we argue that complex situations are generically unlearnable and agents must do with satisficing solutions, as argued long ago by Simon [ Q. J. Econ. 69 , 99 (1955)]. Only a centralized, omniscient agent endowed with enormous computing power could qualify to determine the optimal strategy of all agents. Using a mix of analytical arguments and numerical simulations, we find that (i) long memory of past rewards is beneficial to learning, whereas overreaction to recent past is detrimental and leads to cycles or chaos; (ii) increased competition (nonreciprocity) destabilizes fixed points and leads first to chaos and, in the high competition limit, to quasicycles; (iii) some amount of randomness in the learning process, perhaps paradoxically, allows the system to reach better collective decisions; (iv) nonstationary, "aging" behavior spontaneously emerges in a large swath of parameter space of our complex but static world. On the positive side, we find that the learning process allows cooperative systems to coordinate around satisficing solutions with rather high (but markedly suboptimal) average reward. However, hypersensitivity to the game parameters makes it impossible to predict ex ante who will be better or worse off in our stylized economy. The statistical description of the space of satisficing solutions is an open problem. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021039 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Published by the American Physical Society

Learning, hypothesis testing, and rational-expectations equilibrium

Learning and Macroeconomics

Rational Expectations, psychology and inductive learning via moving thresholds

Unlearnable Games and "Satisficing" Decisions: A Simple Model for a Complex World

Rationalizing Irrational Beliefs

Learning from Others in the Financial Market

Unlearnable Games and "Satisficing'' Decisions: A Simple Model for a Complex World

Rational Expectations Equilibrium

Learning Integrated Inflation Forecasts in a Simple Multi-agent Macroeconomic Model

Learning and Expectations in Dynamic Spatial Economies

Efficient Deviation Types and Learning for Hindsight Rationality in Extensive-Form Games: Corrections

Efficient Deviation Types and Learning for Hindsight Rationality in Extensive-Form Games

Least Squares Learning? Evidence from the Laboratory

Rational Expectations Models with Higher-Order Beliefs

Cycles of cooperation and defection in imperfect learning

Bounded Rationality Equilibrium Learning in Mean Field Games

Social Learning for the Masses

Predicting human behavior in unrepeated, simultaneous-move games

Learning in Games: Neural Computations Underlying Strategic Learning

A Markov analysis of social learning and adaptation

Asymptotic Behavior of Bayesian Learners with Misspecified Models