Abstract:As a schematic model of the complexity economic agents are confronted with, we introduce the "Sherrington-Kirkpatrick game," a discrete time binary choice model inspired from mean-field spin glasses. We show that, even in a completely static environment, agents are unable to learn collectively optimal strategies. This is either because the learning process gets trapped in a suboptimal fixed point or because learning never converges and leads to a never-ending evolution of agent intentions. Contrarily to the hope that learning might save the standard "rational expectation" framework in economics, we argue that complex situations are generically unlearnable and agents must do with satisficing solutions, as argued long ago by Simon [ Q. J. Econ. 69 , 99 (1955)]. Only a centralized, omniscient agent endowed with enormous computing power could qualify to determine the optimal strategy of all agents. Using a mix of analytical arguments and numerical simulations, we find that (i) long memory of past rewards is beneficial to learning, whereas overreaction to recent past is detrimental and leads to cycles or chaos; (ii) increased competition (nonreciprocity) destabilizes fixed points and leads first to chaos and, in the high competition limit, to quasicycles; (iii) some amount of randomness in the learning process, perhaps paradoxically, allows the system to reach better collective decisions; (iv) nonstationary, "aging" behavior spontaneously emerges in a large swath of parameter space of our complex but static world. On the positive side, we find that the learning process allows cooperative systems to coordinate around satisficing solutions with rather high (but markedly suboptimal) average reward. However, hypersensitivity to the game parameters makes it impossible to predict ex ante who will be better or worse off in our stylized economy. The statistical description of the space of satisficing solutions is an open problem. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021039 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Published by the American Physical Society

Learning in Games: Neural Computations Underlying Strategic Learning

Neurocomputations of strategic behavior: From iterated to novel interactions

Capturing the Complexity of Human Strategic Decision-Making with Machine Learning

Unlearnable Games and "Satisficing'' Decisions: A Simple Model for a Complex World

Neural Mechanisms of Social Learning and Decision-Making

Unlearnable Games and "Satisficing" Decisions: A Simple Model for a Complex World

Dissociable Neural Representations of Reinforcement and Belief Prediction Errors Underlie Strategic Learning

Game Interactive Learning: A New Paradigm Towards Intelligent Decision-Making

Social Neuroeconomics:The Neural Basis of Social Decision-making and Game Theory

Strategic Teaching and Learning in Games

Dissociable Contribution Of Prefrontal And Striatal Dopaminergic Genes To Learning In Economic Games

Cognitive mechanisms of learning in sequential decision-making under uncertainty: an experimental and theoretical approach

Learning in Games: a Systematic Review

Playing Extensive Games with Learning of Opponent's Cognition

Non-strategic Econometrics (for Initial Play)

Educational Game on Cryptocurrency Investment: Using Microeconomic Decision Making to Understand Macroeconomics Principles

Learning not to Regret

Short Memory-Based Human Strategy Modeling in Social Dilemmas

Improving Quantal Cognitive Hierarchy Model Through Iterative Population Learning

A calculus of probability or belief? Neural underpinnings of social decision-making in a card game

Learning under Imitative Strategic Behavior with Unforeseeable Outcomes