Abstract:The Sociological Review, Ahead of Print. Mainstream poverty analysis currently renders certain people and degrees of privation more socially legible than others across high-income countries. This article examines how these hierarchies carry through to and corrupt wider social scientific analysis, inscribing differential value to actors and phenomena in ways that undermine social understanding and explanation. First, conventional approaches to poverty analysis and measurement obscure the de facto prevalence of deep poverty, as well as those most subject to its violence. Second, a growing number of hyper-marginalised groups are missing from population income surveys, undermining the accuracy of (deep) poverty estimates and public understanding of both its determinants and dynamics. Third, the inferential and external validity of income surveys is significantly diminished by problems surrounding data quality and coverage. Attempts to address this have principally focused on improving data quality, but as demonstrated in this article, these strategies exacerbate poor representation of the lowest-income groups in distributional analysis. Much more than merely technical or pragmatic, these are theoretical and normative judgements about who counts in welfare policy and politics. Overall, I demonstrate how current data practices occlude some the most violent forms of denigration and exploitation that structure advanced marginality, particularly the gendered, racialised, bordering and ableist practices underpinning state–citizen dynamics. Focusing principally on the UK context, I argue that the epistemic erasure committed features in and systematises a policy blindness to deep poverty for some of the most marginalised social groups making it harder to evidence its effects and address its causes across high-income countries.

Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation

Towards a Theory of Self-Segregation As a Response to Relative Deprivation: Steady-State Outcomes and Social Welfare

Personal Relative Deprivation Reduces the Meaningfulness of Engaging in Prosocial Behavior (7,756 Words)

Theories of reference group and revolution: general theoretical matrix of relative deprivation

Relative Deprivation: A Mechanism for the Ostracism–aggression Link

Personal Relative Deprivation and Locus of Control

Happiness Studies and the Problem of Interpersonal Comparisons of Satisfaction: Two Histories, Three Approaches

A Theory of Self-Segregation As a Response to Relative Deprivation

The Countability Effect: Comparative Versus Experiential Reactions to Reward Distributions

Relative Deprivation and Hope: Predictors of Risk Behavior

Taking psychology seriously: a self-determination theory perspective on Robert Sugden's opportunity criterion

Altruism, Reciprocity, and Probability: Examining relations through a discounting framework

Effects of relative deprivation on change in displaced aggression and the underlying motivation mechanism: A three‐wave cross‐lagged analysis

Perceived Social Exclusion Partially Accounts for Social Status Effects on Subjective Well-Being: A Comparative Study of Japan, Germany, and the United States

A new test of classic strain theory

Social status and unethical behavior: Two replications of the field studies in Piff et al. (2012).

Yesterday's News: A Temporal Discontinuity in the Sting of Inferiority

Understanding the Association of Subjective Perception and Emotional Resentment With Micro- and Macro-Level Violence: A Multilevel SEM Examination of Relative Deprivation Theory

Who counts in poverty research?

Impoverished ascriptions: Investigating stereotypes of single parents from a social role perspective

Loss of Social Status and Subjective Well-Being Across the Adult Life Span: Feeling Stuck or Moving Up?