Abstract:Introduction: Rectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in developed countries. However, despite the increasingly better preoperative diagnostics, adaptation of surgical techniques to the location and advancement of the tumor, the combination of surgical treatment with neoadjuvant therapy and adjuvant treatment, standardized control tests, Poland still has not obtained satisfactory results regarding long-term survival. In addition, the effects of the therapy often differ significantly from those expected by patients and the doctors treating them. Aim of the study: To evaluate the effects of rectal cancer treatment among patients of the General and Oncological Surgery Clinic of the Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin. The impact of numerous factors on postoperative quality of life was analyzed. Material and methods: Between 2007 - 2015, 263 radical resection procedures were performed in patients with diagnosed rectal cancer. Retrospectively, based on medical records, a database was created covering a range of clinical data. Information about death dates of some patients was obtained at the Registry Office in Szczecin. A survey supplementing clinical data and standardized quality of life assessment forms (EORTC QLQ - C30 and CR29) were sent to 120 living patients. A telephone conversation was carried out with some patients who did not respond to the surveys. Finally, data from 90 people was collected, which represents 75% of the patients enrolled in the study. Patients quality of life was assessed using EORTC questionnaire evaluation guides. Results: The patients quality of life worsened the most as a result of anorectal dysfunction. Incontinence of gases and stool, urgency and difficulty in defecation were demonstrated primarily in patients undergoing low rectal resection and irradiation. Patients undergoing radiotherapy, as a result of persistent low anterior resection syndrome, were forced to partially or completely withdraw from professional activity and to limit the pursuit of their interests. Their contacts with family, friends and acquaintances have also deteriorated. The presence of the intestinal stoma significantly affected the deterioration of the reception of the body's own image. However, no relation was found between the existence of the fistula and other aspects of the patients everyday life, including functioning in life and social roles. Conclusions: Due to the acceptable postoperative quality of life of patients with fistula and numerous imperfections of sphincter preserving techniques, operations resulting in terminal ostomy should not be considered as an extremity, and in the case of tumors of the lower rectum with unaffected sphincters, they should be considered as alternative methods for low anterior resection.

A longitudinal study of gender differences in quality of life among Japanese patients with lower rectal cancer treated with sphincter-saving surgery: a 1-year follow-up

Quality of Life after Laparoscopic and Open Radical Resection for Gastric Cancer

Health-related quality of life in patients with lower rectal cancer after sphincter-saving surgery: a prospective 6-month follow-up study

[Current Status of Research on Short-Term Quality of Life after Sphincteric-Saving Surgery in Rectal Cancer Patients].

Bowel dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms on quality of life after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: A cross-sectional study

[Influence of Clinical Characteristics on Health-Related Quality of Life after Mid-Low Rectal Cancer Surgery].

The relationship between bowel symptoms and quality of life among patients with mid and low rectal cancer after sphincter preserving surgery

Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery: a Survey of Chinese Patients

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life After Sphincter-Sparing Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Long-term Longitudinal Follow-up

Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy

[Follow-Up Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life Research after Radical Surgery for Rectal Cancer].

Factors determining the quality of life in patients undergoing radical surgery due to malignant tumors of the rectum

Comparison of Anorectal Function and Quality of Life Measures in Patients Following Intersphincteric Resection and Lower Anterior Resection

Factors affecting quality of life in rectal cancer survivors who have undergone laparoscopic surgery: patient-reported outcomes over 10 years at a single institution

Quality of Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancers: A Clinical Control Study

Survey on Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Low/Ultra-low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer

Patient reported outcomes after multivisceral resection for advanced rectal cancers in female patients

Impact of Defecation Dysfunction on Quality of Life in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer Patients Following Sphincter-Sparing Surgery

Evaluation of Life Quality Following Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancers:A Clinical Control Study

Quality of Life After Surgery for Rectal Cancer: a Comparison of Functional Outcomes After Transanal and Laparoscopic Approaches

Recovery of quality of life in year after laparoscopic or retropubic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional longitudinal study