Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Thoracic Aortic Surgery – Does Sex Matter?
Jennifer Breel,Maaike van Emst,Caitlin Bozic,Henning Hermanns,Rob de LInd van Wijngaarden,Nimrat Grewal,Susanne Eberl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.09.046
IF: 2.894
2024-10-27
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Abstract:Objective The aim of this survey is to assess the quality of life after acute or elective thoracic aortic surgery from the patient's perspective. Design and method An ongoing, cross-sectional, prospective, observational survey conducted in the Amsterdam UMC, from 1st January 2021, involving adult patients who underwent acute or elective cardiac aortic surgery. The Medical Ethics Committee (MEC) determined that the study does not fall under the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act.Participants, who provided consent for their data to be used, were contacted via email, post, or telephone. The survey includes up to 40 questions spanning physical, cognitive, and social functioning, as well as overall satisfaction, using multiple-choice, numeric rating scales (0-10), and open-text responses. Numeric rating scales (NRS) with a score >7 and a Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) score > 6 were positively experienced by the patients. Results and conclusions Preliminary ResultsOf the 312 patients, 142 completed the survey, including 32% females and 68% males, with a mean age of 64 (±10) years. Females were significantly older than males (mean 67 (±10) vs. 62 (±12) years, p=0.009), with no significant differences in the urgency or type of surgery between sexes.Females and males rated their general health and quality of life equally (NRS>7) (73% vs.69%) and (71% vs. 72% respectively), however females' satisfaction with their quality of life was lower (NRS >7) (76% vs. 85%). More females experienced a greater loss of independent functioning (NRS>7) (62% vs. 37%) and lower physical functioning (27% vs. 8% with METs 7) (69% vs. 72%), however 65% of females did not participate in social activities important to them vs. 82% males. In addition, 27% of females reported receiving less emotional support vs. 14% of males.Notably, a high percentage of females (16%) would not choose to undergo the surgery again versus 9% of males. Discussion and Conclusion The survey reveals significant sex-based differences in patient-reported outcomes after thoracic surgery, particularly in physical and cognitive functioning, social satisfaction, and emotional support. These findings highlight the necessity for personalized care approaches, especially for female patients who may have distinct recovery needs. Further research is essential to understand the causes of these disparities and to create interventions that cater to the specific requirements of females during the post-surgical recovery phase. Integrating patient-reported outcomes into surgical evaluations can enhance clinical decisions and improve care quality for all patients undergoing aortic surgery.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease,respiratory system,anesthesiology