Gender, age and flexible working in later life

Wendy Loretto,Sarah Vickerstaff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014545267

2015-02-20

Abstract:In many countries economic and social concerns associated with ageing populations have focused attention onto flexible forms of working as key to encouraging people to work longer and delay retirement. This article argues that there has been a remarkable lack of attention paid to the role of gender in extending working lives and contends that this gap has arisen because of two, inter-related, oversights: little consideration of relationships between gender and flexible working beyond the child-caring phase of life; and the prevailing tendency to think of end of working life and retirement as gender-neutral or following a typical male trajectory. The findings of a qualitative study of people aged 50+ in the UK challenge some of the key assumptions underpinning the utility of flexible work in extending working lives, and provide insight into the ways in which working in later life is constructed and enacted differently for men and women.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore how Flexible Working Options (FWOs) affect people's extension of working years and postponement of retirement in the context of an aging society, with a particular focus on the impact of gender differences on this process. Specifically, the paper points out that there are two major overlooked points in current policy and practice discussions:

1. **The relationship between gender and flexible work**: Most of the existing research and policy discussions focus on how families with young children, especially mothers, balance family responsibilities through flexible work. However, for the older population (over 50 years old), especially after the end of the parenting stage, there is not enough attention to how gender affects the choice and effectiveness of flexible work.

2. **Gender differences in the concept of retirement**: Traditionally, retirement is regarded as an event at the end of a man's career. However, with the trend of extending working years, women's retirement process and experience are significantly different from those of men, but these differences are often overlooked or simplified into gender - neutral phenomena in existing research and policy discussions.

To fill these knowledge gaps, the author conducts a qualitative study on the population over 50 years old in the UK to reveal the attitudes, opportunities, and experiences of different genders in later - life work, especially their views on flexible work and the ways they are applied in real life. The research shows that men and women show different behavior patterns and motivations when facing flexible work options, which are not only influenced by gender roles but also closely related to factors such as personal career trajectories, health conditions, and family responsibilities.

### Summary of the core issues of the paper

- **The role of gender differences in flexible work in later life**: The paper explores how gender affects the demand for and utilization of flexible work among people over 50 years old.
- **Gendered understanding of the concept of retirement**: The paper challenges the traditional definition of "retirement" and emphasizes the complex relationship between women's retirement process, their husbands' retirement, family roles, and career participation.
- **Blind spots in policy and practice**: The paper points out the gender blind spots in current policy and practice discussions and calls for more attention to gender differences in order to develop more effective strategies for extending working years.

Through these analyses, the paper aims to provide a more comprehensive evidence base for policy - makers to better understand and respond to the changes in the labor market in an aging society.