Abstract:Abstract Background Demographic changes in all industrialized countries have led to a keen interest in extending working lives for older workers. To achieve this goal, it is essential to understand the patterns of retirement and specifically what characterizes individuals who continue to work beyond retirement age. Thus, the aim of this paper was to contribute to the international body of empirical knowledge about individuals who continue in the workforce after retirement age. We present evidence from Denmark and examine what characterizes individuals who continue in the workforce after retirement age and investigate the likelihood of continued work after retirement age while controlling for a set of socio-economic and lifestyle factors. Methods The study population consisted of 5,474 respondents to the Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank (CAMB) 2021 survey, divided into two groups. The first group included subjects ( n = 1,293) who stayed longer in the workforce even though they had the possibility to retire. The second group consisted of subjects who had retired full-time at the time of the survey ( n = 4,181). Survey data was linked to register data to provide a broader dataset. In order to investigate the heterogeneity between the two groups in terms of important socio-economic, work-related and health-related variables, t-test, Mann-Whitney U (Wilcoxon Rank) test, and chi-square tests were employed. Further, to examine the probability of an individual working after retirement age a logit model with step-wise inclusion was utilized. Results Overall, individuals who continue to work even though they could retire tend to be wealthier, healthier, and males compared to individuals who are retired full-time. Further, there are more older workers who have partners and are co-habitants than retirees. The likelihood of continuing in the workforce past retirement age is affected by several work-related factors as well as life-style factors. The likelihood of working past retirement age decreases by years spent in the workforce (marginal effect of -0.003), if you have a partner (-0.080) and if your partner is outside of the workforce (marginal effect of -0.106). The likelihood increases by health (marginal effect of -0.044 of moving from excellent/very good health to good health or to fair/poor health, physical working capability (marginal effect of -0.083 of moving from no/some problems to severe problems or cannot work at all) and income (marginal effect of 0.083 from moving from the lowest income-quantile to higher quantiles). Conclusion These results are in line with the previous literature and suggest the importance of designing retirement policies that tailor the transition toward retirement according to specific characteristics of both the individual and the segment of occupation.

Work–family balance in the second half of life: Caregivers' decisions regarding retirement and working time reduction in Europe

Female employment and elderly care: the role of care policies and culture in 21 European countries

The relationship between elder care-giving and labour force participation in the context of policies addressing population ageing: a review of empirical studies published between 2006 and 2016

Older Women: Work and Caregiving in Conflict? A Study of Four Countries

Defamilization? Not for everyone. Unequal labour-market participation among informal caregivers in Europe

Working Carers in Europe and How Their Caring Responsibilities Impact Work–Family Life Conflict: Analysis of the European Quality of Life Survey

Contestations in coping with elderly care: an intersectional analysis addressing family caregivers in Germany

Determinants of trajectories of informal caregiving in later life: evidence from England

Gendered late working life trajectories, family history and welfare regimes: evidence from SHARELIFE

Caring for older parents in Norway – How does it affect labor market participation and absence from work?

Views of aging and mental health – The role of informal care provision: Longitudinal findings of the health and retirement study in the US

WHO WORKS LONGER IN LATER LIFE? KEY VARIATIONS IN WORKING LIFE EXPECTANCY IN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE

Gender differences and individual, household, and workplace characteristics: Regional geographies of extended working lives

Long‐Term Care Across Europe and the United States: The Role of Informal and Formal Care

Caregiving and changes in health-related behaviour

Care Life Expectancy: Gender and Unpaid Work in the Context of Population Aging

Facilitators and barriers for working beyond statutory pension age: A prospective cohort study across 26 European countries

Do Health and Well-Being Change Around the Transition to Informal Caring in Early Adulthood? A Longitudinal Comparison Between the United Kingdom and Germany

Informal dementia care: Consequences for caregivers' health and health care use in 8 European countries

A Global View on the Effects of Work on Health in Later Life

Who continues to work after retirement age?