Abstract:Spatial autoregressive (SAR) and related models offer flexible yet parsimonious ways to model spatial and network interactions. SAR specifications typically rely on a particular parametric functional form and an exogenous choice of the so-called spatial weight matrix with only limited guidance from theory in making these specifications. Also, the choice of a SAR model over other alternatives, such as spatial Durbin (SD) or spatial lagged X (SLX) models, is often arbitrary, raising issues of potential specification error. To address such issues, this paper develops a new specification test within the SAR framework that can detect general forms of misspecification including that of the spatial weight matrix, the functional form and the model itself. The test is robust to the presence of heteroskedasticity of unknown form in the disturbances and the approach relates to the conditional moment test framework of Bierens ([1982, Journal of Econometrics 20, 105–134], [1990, Econometrica 58, 1443–1458]). The Bierens test is shown to be inconsistent in general against spatial alternatives and the new test introduces modifications to achieve test consistency in the spatial setting. A central element is the infinite-dimensional endogeneity induced by spatial linkages. This complexity is addressed by introducing a new component to the omnibus test that captures the effects of potential spatial matrix misspecification. With this modification, the approach leads to a simple pivotal test procedure with standard critical values that is the first test in the literature to have power against misspecifications in the spatial linkages. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the test under the null hypothesis of correct SAR specification and prove consistency. A Monte Carlo study is conducted to study its finite sample performance. An empirical illustration on the performance of the test in modeling tax competition in Finland is included.

Fixed Effects and Random Effects Estimation of Higher-order Spatial Autoregressive Models with Spatial Autoregressive and Heteroscedastic Disturbances

Estimation and testing of higher-order spatial autoregressive panel data error component models

Estimating spatial autoregressions under heteroskedasticity without searching for instruments

Estimation and testing of a higher-order partially linear spatial autoregressive model

A Generalized Moments Estimator for the Autoregressive Parameter in a Spatial Model

Spatial Autoregressive Models with Generalized Spatial Disturbances

Heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators for spatial autoregressive models

Inference for partially linear additive higher-order spatial autoregressive model with spatial autoregressive error and unknown heteroskedasticity

Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances

A study on geographically weighted spatial autoregression models with spatial autoregressive disturbances

GMM estimation of a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances and endogenous regressors

Generalized Spatial and Spatiotemporal Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity

Spatial panels : random components vs . xed e ¤ ects Lung

Heteroskedasticity Robust Specification Testing In Spatial Autoregression

Spatial Panels: Random Components Versus Fixed Effects*

Finite sample properties of estimators of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive disturbances

Neglected dynamics and spatial dependence on panel data: consequences for convergence of the usual static model estimators

Semiparametric Gmm Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models

Estimation of fixed effects partially linear varying coefficient spatial autoregressive model with disturbances correlated in space and time

Random effects specifications in eigenvector spatial filtering: a simulation study

Dynamic Spatial Panel Models: Networks, Common Shocks, and Sequential Exogeneity