Abstract:Spatial autoregressive (SAR) and related models offer flexible yet parsimonious ways to model spatial and network interactions. SAR specifications typically rely on a particular parametric functional form and an exogenous choice of the so-called spatial weight matrix with only limited guidance from theory in making these specifications. Also, the choice of a SAR model over other alternatives, such as spatial Durbin (SD) or spatial lagged X (SLX) models, is often arbitrary, raising issues of potential specification error. To address such issues, this paper develops a new specification test within the SAR framework that can detect general forms of misspecification including that of the spatial weight matrix, the functional form and the model itself. The test is robust to the presence of heteroskedasticity of unknown form in the disturbances and the approach relates to the conditional moment test framework of Bierens ([1982, Journal of Econometrics 20, 105–134], [1990, Econometrica 58, 1443–1458]). The Bierens test is shown to be inconsistent in general against spatial alternatives and the new test introduces modifications to achieve test consistency in the spatial setting. A central element is the infinite-dimensional endogeneity induced by spatial linkages. This complexity is addressed by introducing a new component to the omnibus test that captures the effects of potential spatial matrix misspecification. With this modification, the approach leads to a simple pivotal test procedure with standard critical values that is the first test in the literature to have power against misspecifications in the spatial linkages. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the test under the null hypothesis of correct SAR specification and prove consistency. A Monte Carlo study is conducted to study its finite sample performance. An empirical illustration on the performance of the test in modeling tax competition in Finland is included.

Estimation and testing of higher-order spatial autoregressive panel data error component models

Fixed Effects and Random Effects Estimation of Higher-order Spatial Autoregressive Models with Spatial Autoregressive and Heteroscedastic Disturbances

Inference for partially linear additive higher-order spatial autoregressive model with spatial autoregressive error and unknown heteroskedasticity

Semiparametric Gmm Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models

Heteroskedasticity Robust Specification Testing In Spatial Autoregression

Estimation and testing of a higher-order partially linear spatial autoregressive model

Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with an Endogenous Spatial Weight Matrix

GMM estimation of a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances and endogenous regressors

GMM estimation of spatial autoregressive models in a system of simultaneous equations with heteroskedasticity

Dynamic Spatial Autoregressive Models with Autoregressive and Heteroskedastic Disturbances

Estimating spatial autoregressions under heteroskedasticity without searching for instruments

Spatial autoregressive with a spatial autoregressive error term model and its parameter estimation with two-stage generalized spatial least square procedure

Semiparametric Spatial Autoregressive Panel Data Model with Fixed Effects and Time-Varying Coefficients

Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects

Consistent Non-Gaussian Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Estimators Of Spatial Autoregressive Models

Generalized Spatial and Spatiotemporal Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity

A semiparametric dynamic higher-order spatial autoregressive model

Estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances based on the indirect inference principle

A Spatial Autoregression Model with Time-Varying Coefficients

A Generalized Moments Estimator for the Autoregressive Parameter in a Spatial Model

Fast Two-Stage Variational Bayesian Approach to Estimating Panel Spatial Autoregressive Models with Unrestricted Spatial Weights Matrices