Abstract:This presentation focuses on a transdisciplinary approach to innovative and collaborative learning practices driven by technology. It highlights two salient elements associated with industry practices and processes in relation to learning and educational contexts: empowerment of individuals and communities of practice through technology, and a broader consideration of industrial approaches to the concept of learning and teaching enhanced within a digital environment. More precisely, this presentation will feature some of the key theoretical frameworks used in three different settings of learning and teaching in France with regards to the life-long learning approach thanks to Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) (WEF, 2016). It will also discuss the positive effect of the Internet and its affordances (Southerton & Taylor, 2020) on reducing the differences between theoretical and applied knowledge via professional-focused communities (Danvers, 2003). Thus, it will briefly explain that spatial and cognitive learning proximities (Lave & Wenger 1991; Fruchter, 2001) can be reduced by virtue of technology (Anders, 2016; Antonczak, 2019; Glazewski & Hmelo-Silver, 2019) and that ‘computer-supported collaborative learning’ methods can facilitate social and shared problem-solving (Sawyer, 2005; Levallet & Chan, 2018; Presicce et al., 2020) without the ‘restriction of time and place’ (Cheng et al., 2019, 489). Additionally, it will point out some aspects of problem-solving through ‘emancipatory learning and social action’ (Merriam, 2001, 9) through the use of ‘actual’ content and ‘actionable feedback’ (Woods & Hennessy, 2019) enhanced by digital tools and tactics. Next, it will focus on three case studies by concisely presenting key specifics for each of the courses, including the various digital tools used and followed by some quick interim reflections. Then it will summarise the challenges and the barriers encountered across the different practices such as virtual delivery, the size of the students' groups and some connectivity considerations. It will be followed by the principal advantages and opportunities, like the professionalisation dimension through interactive and authentic learning enhanced by affordances. And it will conclude with some managerial recommendations as experiential and practical methods (knowledge codification) thanks to industry-based teaching supported by digital technologies. The presentation will close with the overall conclusion in relation to digital technology and some of the key 21st-century career skills. In general, the findings will be of interest to academics, practitioners and policymakers. The added value of this transdisciplinary investigation is that it improves research on collaborative innovation and collective knowledge by creating a bridge between the fields of Education and Business. Bibliography Anders, A. (2016). Team communication platforms and emergent social collaboration practices. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), pp. 224-261. Ananiadou, K. & M. Claro (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing. Antonczak, L. (2019). Scaling-up collaborative practices through mobile technology. The 25th International Conference on Engineering/International Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC), June 17-19, Nice. Askay, D. A. & Spivack, A. J. (2010). The multidimensional role of trust in enabling creativity within virtual communities of practice: A theoretical model integrating swift, knowledge-based, institution-based, and organizational trust. In 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, pp. 1-10. Cairns, L. (2000). The process/outcome approach to becoming a capable organization. In Australian Capability Network Conference, Sydney, 1-14. Cheng, E. W., Chu, S. K., & Ma, C. S. (2019). Students’ intentions to use PBWorks: a factor-based PLS-SEM approach. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(7/8), 489-504. Cochrane, T., Antonczak, L., Guinibert, M., Mulrennan, D., Rive, V., & Withell, A. (2017). A framework for designing transformative mobile learning. In Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region ( 25-43). Springer, Singapore. Danvers, J. (2003). Towards a radical pedagogy: Provisional notes on learning and teaching in art & design. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 22(1), 47-57. Dewey, J. (1991). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 12 (1-5). Carbondale, IL: SIU Press. [Originally published in 1938] Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1-16. Fruchter, R. (2001). Dimensions of teamwork education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4/5), 426-430. Glazewski, K. D., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2019). Scaffolding and supporting the use of information for ambitious learning practices. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(1/2), 39-58. Hase, S. & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111-119. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Levallet, N., & Chan, Y. E. (2018). Role of Digital Capabilities in Unleashing the Power of Managerial Improvisation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 17(1), 1-21. Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change. Readings in Social Psychology, 3(1), 197-211. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic review of design-based research progress: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing?. Educational Researcher, 42(2), 97-100. Makri, S., Ravem, M., & McKay, D. (2017). After serendipity strikes: Creating value from encountered information. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 279-288. Mascheroni, G., & Vincent, J. (2016). Perpetual contact as a communicative affordance: Opportunities, constraints, and emotions. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(3), 310-326. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, 3-13. Pont, B. (2013). Learning Standards, Teaching Standards and Standards for School Principals: A Comparative Study. Rapport no. EDU/WKP(2013)14. Centre of Study for Policies and Practices in Education (CEPPE). Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/WKP(2013)14&docLanguage=En (accessed December 31, 2020). Presicce, C., Jain, R., Rodeghiero, C., Gabaree, L. E., & Rusk, N. (2020). WeScratch: an inclusive, playful and collaborative approach to creative learning online. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7/8), 695-704. Reeves, T. C. (2005). Design-based research in educational technology: Progress made, challenges remain. Educational Technology, 45(1), 48-52. Southerton, C., & Taylor, E. (2020). Habitual disclosure: Routine, affordance, and the ethics of young peoples social media data surveillance. Social Media+ Society, 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120915612

Abstract:ABSTRACT: Regarding their competence, teachers must be able to improve their professional competence by utilizing technology and communication (ICT) by the demands of 21st-century competence. Furthermore, the nation's problems in the field of education and professionalism include several main problems that require more applicable and quality training for teachers and parents. This research aims to measure the perceptions of ECCE parents and teachers regarding the digital competence (use of technological devices and ability to access the internet) of online learning that they carry out, whether the learning is effective and able to measure children's competence or competence still needs to be improved to make it even better. The method that will be used in this research is quantitative research with a survey method in the form of a questionnaire. Participants are focused on ECCE teachers and parents who have early childhood children, especially kindergartens and elementary school grades 1 and 2 (aged 4 to 8 years). The results of the data analysis, of this research show that both parents and teachers feel face-to-face learning is more effective than online learning. This condition is supported by data that both parents and teachers feel obstacles and doubts that online learning can measure children's competence. Keywords: professional development, digital learning, digital competencies, technology in learning References: Abbas, H. (2015). Straightening the Direction of Education. PT PP Mardi Mulyo. Abbas, H. (2020). Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Education: Expedient Truths. PT PP Mardi Mulyo. Abdallah, A. K. (2018). Parents Perception of E-Learning in Abu Dhabi Schools in United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 4(10). http://ijasos.ocerintjournals.org/en/download/article-file/458240 Advocates, E. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act: Comparison of the No Child Left Behind Act to the Every Student Succeeds Act. www.acsd.org Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: towards a conceptual understanding. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Alhumaid, K., Ali, S., Waheed, A., Zahid, E., & Habes, M. (2020). COVID-19 & Elearning: Perceptions &Attitudes Of Teachers Towards E-Learning Acceptance in The Developing Countries. Multicultural Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4060121 Alkaabi, S. A. R., Alkaabi, W., &; Vyver, G. (2017). Researching Student Motivation. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 10(3). https://clutejournals.com/index.php/CIER/article/view/9985/10086 Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 12(3). Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., &; Oliveira, T. (2017). Grit in the path to e-learning success. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.10.009 Best, S. J., & Harrison, C. H. (2009). Internet Survey Methods. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=m4_MAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA375&dq=fowler+2009+survey&ots=ZVUJUrEXyq&sig=ULNAWcDriqjKfOWg9FasuNS39ns&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false Billingham, K. A., & Billingham, K. A. (2019). Early Childhood Development. In Developmental Psychology for the Health Care Professions. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429045141-3 Cheok, M. L., Wong, S. L., Ayub, A. F., &; Mahmud, R. (2017). Teachers' Perceptions of E-Learning in Malaysian Secondary Schools. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2). www.mojet.net Cole, A. W., Anderson, C., Bunton, T., Cherney, M. R., Cronin Fisher, V., Draeger, Jr., R., Featherston, M., Motel, L., Nicolini, K. M., Peck, B., & Allen, M. (2017). Student Predisposition to Instructor Feedback and Perceptions of Teaching Presence Predict Motivation Toward Online Courses. Online Learning, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.966 Cresswell, J. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In Research Design (Fifth). SAGE. https://edge.sagepub.com/creswellrd5e/student-resources-0 Cresswell, J. W., &; Cresswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth). SAGE Publications, Inc. Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (fourth). Student Library. Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K. H., &; Gräbe, C. (2016). The Use of Mobile Learning in Science: A Systematic Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2016 25:2, 25(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10956-015-9597-X Daniels, M. M., Sarte, E., & Cruz, J. Dela. (2019). Students' perception of e-learning: a basis for the development of e-learning framework in higher education institutions Recent citations. The International Conference on Information Technology and Digital Applications. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/482/1/012008 Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., & Bre, B. N. (2013). DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. https://doi.org/10.2788/52966 Ghomi, M., &; Redecker, C. (2019). Digital competence of educators (DigCompedu): Development and evaluation of a self-assessment instrument for teachers' digital competence. CSEDU 2019 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 1(Csedu), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007679005410548 Hobbs, R., & Tuzel, S. (2017). Teacher motivations for digital and media literacy: An examination of Turkish educators. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12326 Jiménez-Hernández, D., González-Calatayud, V., Torres-Soto, A., Mayoral, A. M., &; Morales, J. (2020). Digital competence of future secondary school teachers: Differences according to gender, age, and branch of knowledge. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229473 Kontos, G. (2015). Practical teaching aids for online classes. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(1), 36-52 Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Teacher educators' digital competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.726273 Lestiyanawati, R. (2020). The Strategies and Problems Faced by Indonesian Teachers in Conducting E-learning During COVID-19 Outbreak. CLLiENT (Culture et al.), 2(1). https://ojs.unsiq.ac.id/index.php/cllient/article/view/1271 Lin, M.-H., Chen, H., &; Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasian Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553–3564. Lubis, A. H., &; Lubis, Z. (2020). Parent's Perceptions on E-Learning During Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(18). McGarr, O., & McDonagh, A. (2020). Exploring the digital competence of pre-service teachers on entry onto an initial teacher education program in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 40(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2020.1800501 McKnight, K., O'Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856 Røkenes, F. M., &; Krumsvik, R. J. (2016). Prepared to teach ESL with ICT? A study of digital competence in Norwegian teacher education. Computers and Education, 97, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.014 Simonson, M., Zvacek, S. M., & Smaldino, S. (2019). Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education 7th Edition. IAP. Tudor, S., Stan, M., & Paisi-Lazarescu, M. (2015). Integration of e-learning in teaching/learning courses at preschool and primary pedagogical teachers. eLearning & Software for Education, 2, 340-345 Vitoria, L., Mislinawati, M., &; Nurmasyitah, N. (2018). Students' perceptions on the implementation of e-learning: Helpful or unhelpful? The 6th South East Asia Design Research International Conference (6th SEA-DR IC).https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012058 Wasserman, E., &; Migdal, R. (2019). Professional development: Teachers' attitudes in online and traditional training courses. Online Learning Journal. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1299

Cultural Parent and Learning in the Knowledge Society: A Survey with Students of Primary Education

The Research On Cultural Perspective For The Virtual Survival Of Undergraduates

Looking at the impact of digital revolution in school education: considerations and insights

The family-school relationship in primary education

The Creation of Situated Boundary Objects in Socio-Educational Contexts for Boundary Crossing in Higher Education

Cultural Images of Children, Parents and Professionals: Italian Interpretations of Home-School Relationships

When industry meets academia

Parents as Agents of Influence on Children's Digital Skills Development

Bridging cultural studies and learning science: An investigation of social media use for Holocaust memory and education in the digital age

A retrospective study exploring parents' perceptions of their child's assessment

Primary school teachers’ professional development through the learning ecologies lens: new ways for keeping up to date in uncertain times

Understanding Information Literacy Engagement Patterns of Generation Z

Parental Perceptions of Child’s Play in the Post-Digital Era: Parents’ Dilemma with Digital Formats Informing the Kindergarten Curriculum

Connections and disconnections between home and kindergarten: A case study of a 4‐year old child's digital practices and experiences in early childhood

Supporting young children as digital citizens: The importance of shared understandings of technology to support integration in play-based learning

EDUCATION 4.0 FRAMEWORK: ENRICHING ACTIVE LEARNING WITH VIRTUAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL TOOLS

The Effectiveness of Online Learning as A Form of Critical Pedagogic Transformation: The Perceptions of ECCE Teachers and Parents

Family Context, Identity and Internet Use: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Group of Italian Adolescents During COVID-19 Pandemic

EXPLORA: A teacher-apprentice methodology for eliciting natural child-computer interactions

Social Sustainability and Professional Development: Assessing a Training Course on Intercultural Education for In-Service Teachers

Designing Collective Teacher-Children Personas in Preschool: A Methodological Approach