Intraoperative Positioning in Maxillofacial Trauma Patients With Cervical Spine Injury – Is It Safe? Radiological Simulation in a Healthy Volunteer

Thomas Pepper,Harry Spiers,Alex Weller,Clare Schilling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875211053091

2022-01-03

Abstract:Introduction Cervical spine (C-spine) injury is present in up to 10% of patients with maxillofacial fractures. Uncertainty over the status of the C-spine and permitted head movements may delay maxillofacial surgical intervention, resulting in prolonged patient discomfort and return to oral nutrition, reducing quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the effects on the C-spine of positioning patients for maxillofacial procedures by simulating intraoperative positions for common maxillofacial procedures. Methods Magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of head position in common intraoperative configurations – neutral (anterior mandible position), extended (tracheostomy position) and laterally rotated (mandibular condyle position) on the C-spine of a healthy volunteer. Results In the tracheostomy position, maximal movement occurred in the sagittal plane between the cervico-occipital junction and C4–C5, as well as at the cervico-thoracic junction. Minimal movement occurred at C2 (on C3), C5 (on C6) and C6 (on C7). In the mandibular condyle position, C-spine movements occurred in both rotational and sagittal planes. Maximal movement occurred above the level of C4, concentrated at atlanto-occipital and atlanto-axial (C1–2) joints. Conclusion Neck extension is likely to be relatively safe in injuries that are stable in flexion and extension, such as odontoid peg fracture and fractures between C5 and C7. Head rotation is likely to be relatively safe in fractures below C4, as well as vertebral body fractures, and laminar fractures without disc disruption. Early dialogue with the neurosurgical team remains a central tenet of safe management of patients with combined maxillofacial and C-spine injuries.