Comparative analyses of animal-tracking data reveal ecological significance of endothermy in fishes

Yuuki Y. Watanabe,Kenneth J. Goldman,Jennifer E. Caselle,Demian D. Chapman,Yannis P. Papastamatiou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500316112
IF: 11.1
2015-04-20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance Most fishes are cold-blooded, but tunas and some sharks (e.g., white sharks) maintain their exercising muscles warmer than ambient waters. This ability is a remarkable example of convergent evolution because bony and cartilaginous fishes diverged as long as 450 million years ago. What are the ecological benefits driving the evolution of warm muscles in fishes? Despite extensive discussion, no previous studies have tested a simple possibility that fishes with warm muscles may swim faster in nature. We demonstrate that fishes with warm muscles swim faster and perform larger-scale annual migrations than similar-sized cold-blooded fishes. Our results suggest that warm muscles enhance power output and, thus, cruising speeds, which may enable longer-distance migrations and potentially greater access to seasonally available resources.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?