Abstract:Analogies are used to make abstract topics meaningful and more easily comprehensible to learners. Incorporating simple analogies into STEM classrooms is a fairly common practice, but the analogies are typically generated and explained by the instructor for the learners. We hypothesize that challenging learners to create complex, extended analogies themselves can promote integration of content knowledge and development of critical thinking skills, which are essential for deep learning, but are challenging to teach. In this qualitative study, college biology students (n = 30) were asked to construct a complex analogy about the flow of genetic information using a familiar item. One week later, participants constructed a second analogy about the same topic, but this time using a more challenging item. Twenty participants worked on the challenging analogy in pairs, while the other 10 worked alone. Analysis of the 50 interviews resulted in a novel-scoring scheme, which measured both content knowledge (understanding of biology terms) and critical thinking (alignment of relationships between elements of the analogy). Most participants improved slightly due to practice, but they improved dramatically when working with a partner. The biggest gains were seen in critical thinking, not content knowledge. Having students construct complex, sophisticated analogies in pairs is a high-impact practice that can help students develop their critical thinking skills, which are crucial in academic and professional settings. The discussion between partners likely requires students to justify their explanations and critique their partner's explanations, which are characteristics of critical thinking.

Rapid Learning in a Children's Museum via Analogical Comparison

Making Connections in Math: Activating a Prior Knowledge Analogue Matters for Learning

Language Helps Children Succeed On A Classic Analogy Task

Mutual Bootstrapping Between Language and Analogical Processing

Analogical Concept Memory for Architectures Implementing the Common Model of Cognition

Implicit Analogies in Learning: Supporting Transfer by Warming Up

Reinforcement Learning with Analogical Similarity to Guide Schema Induction and Attention

Development of Analogical Reasoning: A Novel Perspective From Cross‐Cultural Studies

AnaloBench: Benchmarking the Identification of Abstract and Long-context Analogies

Where Hypotheses Come From: Learning New Relations by Structural Alignment

From integers to fractions: The role of analogy in transfer and long-term learning

Schema induction and analogical transfer

Constructing analogies: Developing critical thinking through a collaborative task

In-Context Analogical Reasoning with Pre-Trained Language Models

Semantic Structure-Mapping in LLM and Human Analogical Reasoning

Boosting Scientific Concepts Understanding: Can Analogy from Teacher Models Empower Student Models?

Playing on patterns: is it a case of analogical transfer?

Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer

Analogical thinking modifiability and math processing strategy

Humanoid infers Archimedes' principle: understanding physical relations and object affordances through cumulative learning experiences

Rapid trial-and-error learning with simulation supports flexible tool use and physical reasoning