Abstract:Big ideas in science education are meant to be interpretive frameworks that empower student learning. Unfortunately, outside of the broad conception of scientific evaluation, there are few theoretical explanations of how this might happen. Therefore, we contribute one such explanation, an instructional concept called integrative analysis wherein students use a big idea to interconnect isolated scenarios and enrich their meanings. We illustrate the characteristics and value of integrative analysis within an empirical study of student learning in 9th-grade biology. The study focused on using energy transfer as a big idea for teaching cellular respiration. Fifty-nine students were randomly assigned to one of two instructional conditions. In the "analysis" condition, students processed a set of three manipulatives representing cellular respiration molecules; then, they abstracted the deep energy transfer structure of these manipulatives as a big idea. In the "recognition" condition, students processed the same molecule-manipulatives, but without energy interpretations. Instead, they constructed additional manipulatives using novel materials. Then, students in both conditions received an identical lesson where they used their knowledge of the manipulatives to learn about one cellular respiration process, glycolysis. Specifically, students processed a sequence of three texts describing glycolysis, annotating the texts with either their deep energy transfer structure (analysis condition) or their contextualized knowledge of the manipulatives (recognition condition). A posttest showed that in the analysis condition, this process was significantly integrative as evidenced by analysis students' advantage over recognition students in connecting glycolysis to novel phenomena and generating causal explanations about glycolysis.

Experimental brain abscess development in the chronically immunosuppressed host. Computerized tomographic and neuropathological correlations.

Making expert processes visible: how and why theorists use assumptions and analogies in their research

"I'll just try to mimic that": an exploration of students' analogical structure creation in abstract algebra

Using Analogies to Improve Elementary School Students' Inferential Reasoning About Scientific Concepts

Boosting Scientific Concepts Understanding: Can Analogy from Teacher Models Empower Student Models?

Understanding Narratives through Dimensions of Analogy

Beyond Numbers: Creating Analogies to Enhance Data Comprehension and Communication with Generative AI

Making Connections in Math: Activating a Prior Knowledge Analogue Matters for Learning

Challenges in Analogical Reasoning

Using graph-based assessments within socratic tutorials to reveal and refine students' analytical thinking about molecular networks

Seeking instructional specificity: an example from analogical instruction

The Use of Analogies in Mathematics Instruction: Affordances and Challenges

Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds

Integrative Analysis Using Big Ideas: Energy Transfer and Cellular Respiration

Use of analogies in science education, a systematic mapping study

Development of Analogical Reasoning: A Novel Perspective From Cross‐Cultural Studies

Elucidating STEM Concepts through Generative AI: A Multi-modal Exploration of Analogical Reasoning

Using analogies to facilitate conceptual change in mathematics learning

Implicit Analogies in Learning: Supporting Transfer by Warming Up

Generating Distant Analogies Facilitates Relational Integration: Intermediary Role of Relational Mindset and Cognitive Load

What Can You Infer from This Example? Applications of Online, Rich-Media Tasks for Enhancing Pre-service Teachers’ Knowledge of the Roles of Examples in Proving