Abstract:In this review, current EU GMO regulations are subjected to a point-by point analysis to determine their suitability for agriculture in modern Europe. Our analysis concerns present GMO regulations as well as suggestions for possible new regulations for genome editing and New Breeding Techniques (for which no regulations presently exist). Firstly, the present GMO regulations stem from the early days of recombinant DNA and are not adapted to current scientific understanding on this subject. Scientific understanding of GMOs has changed and these regulations are now, not only unfit for their original purpose, but, the purpose itself is now no longer scientifically valid. Indeed, they defy scientific, economic, and even common, sense. A major EU regulatory preconception is that GM crops are basically different from their parent crops. Thus, the EU regulations are "process based" regulations that discriminate against GMOs simply because they are GMOs. However current scientific evidence shows a blending of classical crops and their GMO counterparts with no clear demarcation line between them. Canada has a "product based" approach and determines the safety of each new crop variety independently of the process used to obtain it. We advise that the EC re-writes it outdated regulations and moves toward such a product based approach. Secondly, over the last few years new genomic editing techniques (sometimes called New Breeding Techniques) have evolved. These techniques are basically mutagenesis techniques that can generate genomic diversity and have vast potential for crop improvement. They are not GMO based techniques (any more than mutagenesis is a GMO technique), since in many cases no new DNA is introduced. Thus they cannot simply be lumped together with GMOs (as many anti-GMO NGOs would prefer). The EU currently has no regulations to cover these new techniques. In this review, we make suggestions as to how these new gene edited crops may be regulated. The EU is at a turning point where the wrong decision could destroy European agricultural competitively for decades to come.

State of the art: Russia starts genome-edited plant assessment

Swiftly Evolving CRISPR Genome Editing: a Revolution in Genetic Engineering for Developing Stress-Resilient Crops

Current status and prospects of plant genome editing in Australia

China's regulatory change toward genome-edited crops

Geneedited plants: achievements and prospects (review)

Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion

Genetically modified crop regulations: scope and opportunity using the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing approach

Biosafety of Genome Editing Applications in Plant Breeding: Considerations for a Focused Case-Specific Risk Assessment in the EU

Genome-Editing Products Line up for the Market: Will Europe Harvest the Benefits from Science and Innovation?

Genome Editing with Engineered Nucleases in Economically Important Animals and Plants: State of the Art in the Research Pipeline

Non-safety Assessments of Genome-Edited Organisms: Should They be Included in Regulation?

Genome editing for crop improvement: A perspective from India

Risks of modern biotechnologies and legal aspects of their implementation in agriculture

The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops

Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops

DNA-Free Genome Editing: Past, Present and Future

New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology

Genome editing in food and agriculture: from regulations to consumer perspectives

Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom – A Review

Consumers' perceptions and acceptance of genome editing in agriculture: Insights from the United States of America and Switzerland

Genome Editing for Sustainable Agriculture in Africa