Early Goal-Directed Therapy With and Without Intermittent Superior Vena Cava Oxygen Saturation Monitoring in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Puneet Jain,Ramachandran Rameshkumar,Ponnarmeni Satheesh,Subramanian Mahadevan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-021-2392-2
2021-05-28
Indian Pediatrics
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) ‘with’ and ‘without’ intermittent superior vena cava oxygen saturation (ScvO2) monitoring in pediatric septic shock.DesignOpen label randomized controlled trial.SettingPediatric intensive care unit in a tertiary care center.ParticipantsChildren aged 1 month to 12 year with septic shock.InterventionPatients not responding to fluid resuscitation (up to 40 mL/kg) were randomized to EGDT ‘with’ (n=59) and ‘without’ (n=61) ScvO2 groups. Resuscitation was guided by ScvO2 monitoring at 1-hour, 3-hour, and later on six-hourly in the ‘with’ ScvO2 group, and by clinical variables in the ‘without’ ScvO2 group.OutcomePrimary outcome was all-cause 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were time to and proportion of patients achieving therapeutic endpoints (at 6 hours and PICU stay), need for organ supports, new organ dysfunction (at 24 hours and PICU stay), and length of PICU and hospital stay.ResultsThe study was stopped after interim analysis due to lower mortality in the intervention group. There was significantly lower all-cause 28-day mortality in EDGT with ScvO2 than without ScvO2 group [37.3% vs. 57.5%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.57, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.97, P=0.04]. Therapeutic endpoints were achieved early in ‘with’ ScvO2 group [mean (SD) 3.6 (1.6) vs. 4.2 (1.6) h, P=0.03]. Organ dysfunction by sequential organ assessment score during PICU stay was lower in ‘with’ ScvO2 group [median (IQR) 5 (2,11) vs. 8 (3,13); P=0.03]. There was no significant difference in other secondary outcomes.ConclusionEGDT with intermittent ScvO2 monitoring was associated with reduced mortality and improved organ dysfunction in pediatric septic shock.
pediatrics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?