Effects of Goal Directed Therapy for Adult Patients in Sepsis: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Xiabing Lang,Yi Yang,Ping Zhang,Wenhua Lei,Jianghua Chen

2017-01-01

Abstract:Backgroud: The effectiveness of goal directed therapy (GDT) as a key strategy to decrease mortality is uncertain among patients with sepsis or septic shock. Objective and methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the MEDLINE database (1996 through April 2015), EMBASE (1988 through April 2015). Randomized controlled trials comparing outcome with or without GDT to decrease mortality among adult patients with sepsis or septic shock were identified. Results: 15 studies (5356 participants) were included. GDT decreased the overall mortality for adult patients with sepsis compared to the control group (risk ratio [RR]=0.86; 95% CI=0.76 to 0.97; P=0.02; I2=56%) with marginal statistical significance. GDT also associated with shorter length of ICU stay (mean difference, -1.56; 95% CI=-3.06- -0.07; P<0.00001), more dobutamine use (RR=2.80; 95% CI=1.24-6.33; P=0.01; I-2=95%). But there was no difference in length of hospital stay, incidence of MODS, renal dysfunction and amount of intravenous fluid. The timing and pretreatment prior to randomization for resuscitation suggested that a mortality benefit was enhanced in the subgroup of EGDT without administration of fluids prior to randomization (6 trials; RR=0.73; 95% CI=0.65-0.82; P<0.00001; I-2=0%). No benefit of GDT was seen if there was a pretreatment with intravenous fluids prior to randomization (3 trials; RR=1.02; 95% CI=0.91-1.15; P=0.72; I-2=0%) or GDT more than 6 hours (6 trials; RR=0.90; 95% CI=0.66-1.23; P=0.53; I-2=59%). Conclusion: GDT might be beneficial for the adult patients undergoing sepsis. Early fluid resuscitation rather than the specific protocols for resuscitation have more benefit in sepsis management.