Abstract:Abstract Most of the growth in agricultural output in the last thirty years comes from increases in the efficiency with which both land and non-land inputs are used. Recent work calls for a better understanding of whether this efficiency, known as total factor productivity (TFP), contributes to a more sustainable food system. Key to this understanding is the documented phenomenon that, instead of saving lands, the introduction of technologies that improve agricultural productivity encourage cropland expansion. We extend the results of a recently published econometric model of cross-country cropland change and TFP growth to explore the extent to which improvements in technology were associated with lower greenhouse emissions from land conversion to agriculture as well as with lower land conversion pressures in biodiversity-rich biomes. We focus on the decade of 2001–2010, a period in which our sample of 70 countries (≈75% of global croplands) experienced net land contraction. Except in sub-Saharan Africa and South and East Asia, regional TFP growth was associated with regional land expansion, thus confirming the existence of Jevons paradox in most regions of the world. However, such expansion was more than offset by indirect land use effects stemming from increases in productivity somewhere else. These indirect effects are far from trivial. In the absence of TFP growth, our estimates suggest that ≈125 Mha would have been needed to satisfy demand, half of which are in the four most biodiverse biomes of the world; estimated land use emissions from the ensuing changes in land use range from a lower bound of 17 Gt CO2eq to an upper bound of 84 Gt CO2eq, depending on whether the expansion would have occurred on pasturelands or forest, in contrast to the ≈1 to 15 Gt CO2eq imputed to observed cropland expansion. Our projections of the land needed to satisfy projected growth in TFP per capita during 2018–2023 indicate that current rates of TFP growth are insufficient to prevent further land expansion, reversing in most cases the in-sample trends in land contraction observed during 2001–2010.

Land Misallocation and Productivity

Land Use Regulation, Land Reclamation, and Industrial Productivity: Evidence from China

How Does Land Rental Affect Agricultural Labor Productivity? an Empirical Study in Rural China

The Misallocation Cost of Inefficient Environmental Regulation: Evidence from China

Determinants of Factor Misallocation in Agricultural Production and Implications for Agricultural Supply‐side Reform in China

Misallocation and TFP in Rural China

Clearance of Cyclopentyladenosine and Cyclohexyladenosine in Rats Following a Single Subcutaneous Dose

Land misallocation and economic performance: evidence from China

The Effect of Labor Misallocation on TFP:China's Evidence 1978—2007

Finance and Misallocation: Evidence from Plant-Level Data

Factor Distortion,Misallocation and Productivity

Land Reallocation and Its Impacts on Technical Efficiency --Evidence from China's Agricultural Production

How Does Land Transfer Impact the Household Labor Productivity in China? Empirical Evidence from Survey Data in Shandong

Property Rights, Land Misallocation, and Agricultural Efficiency in China

Land Reallocation and Its Impacts on Technical Efficiency --evidence from China’s Agricultural Production

Consequences of agricultural total factor productivity growth for the sustainability of global farming: accounting for direct and indirect land use effects

Land market distortion and agricultural green total factor productivity: provincial-level evidence from China

New perspectives on farm size and productivity

New estimates of total factor productivity, technical and efficiency changes for the global agricultural economy

Agricultural Composition and Labor Productivity

Resource misallocation and unbalanced growth in green total factor productivity in Chinese agriculture